Forgetting by any other name: The effect of instruction framing on item-method directed forgetting.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Tracy L Taylor, Kathleen L Hourihan
{"title":"Forgetting by any other name: The effect of instruction framing on item-method directed forgetting.","authors":"Tracy L Taylor, Kathleen L Hourihan","doi":"10.1177/17470218251364812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a typical item-method directed forgetting task, study words are presented one at a time, each followed by an instruction to Remember or Forget. Subsequent recognition shows a directed forgetting effect, with better recognition of to-be-remembered words than to-be-forgotten words. This study determined whether recognition depends only on the intention to remember or forget or also on the words used to frame the trial-by-trial instructions or task. In Experiments 1 and 3, participants were instructed, trial-by-trial, to Remember and Forget, Remember and Don't Remember, Don't Forget and Forget, or were told that some words were Important and that others were Not Important. There was no compelling evidence that the directed forgetting effect was altered by the specific words used as these trial-by-trial instructions. However, in Experiment 2, a smaller directed forgetting effect occurred when the task was framed as requiring participants to Remember unless instructed otherwise, compared to when it was framed as requiring participants to Forget unless instructed otherwise. These findings emphasize the freedom that researchers have for deciding how to frame trial-by-trial instructions and the caution they must use in deciding how to frame the task itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251364812"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251364812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a typical item-method directed forgetting task, study words are presented one at a time, each followed by an instruction to Remember or Forget. Subsequent recognition shows a directed forgetting effect, with better recognition of to-be-remembered words than to-be-forgotten words. This study determined whether recognition depends only on the intention to remember or forget or also on the words used to frame the trial-by-trial instructions or task. In Experiments 1 and 3, participants were instructed, trial-by-trial, to Remember and Forget, Remember and Don't Remember, Don't Forget and Forget, or were told that some words were Important and that others were Not Important. There was no compelling evidence that the directed forgetting effect was altered by the specific words used as these trial-by-trial instructions. However, in Experiment 2, a smaller directed forgetting effect occurred when the task was framed as requiring participants to Remember unless instructed otherwise, compared to when it was framed as requiring participants to Forget unless instructed otherwise. These findings emphasize the freedom that researchers have for deciding how to frame trial-by-trial instructions and the caution they must use in deciding how to frame the task itself.

表达:任何其他名称的遗忘:教学框架对项目方法定向遗忘的影响。
在一个典型的项目法导向遗忘任务中,每次呈现一个学习单词,每个单词后面都有一个记住或忘记的指令。后续识别表现出定向遗忘效应,对待记单词的识别优于待忘单词。这项研究确定了识别是否只取决于记忆或遗忘的意图,还是也取决于用于构建逐项指令或任务的单词。在实验1和3中,参与者被一次又一次地指示记住和忘记,记住和不记住,不要忘记和忘记,或者被告知一些单词是重要的,另一些是不重要的。没有令人信服的证据表明,定向遗忘效应会被作为这些逐次指令使用的特定单词所改变。然而,在实验2中,当任务被设定为要求参与者记住除非另有指示时,与要求参与者忘记除非另有指示时相比,定向遗忘效应较小。这些发现强调了研究人员在决定如何构建一个接一个的试验指令时的自由,以及他们在决定如何构建任务本身时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信