Investigating the impact of social media images on users' sentiments towards sociopolitical events based on deep artificial intelligence.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326936
Nafiseh Jabbari Tofighi, Reda Alhajj
{"title":"Investigating the impact of social media images on users' sentiments towards sociopolitical events based on deep artificial intelligence.","authors":"Nafiseh Jabbari Tofighi, Reda Alhajj","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0326936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents the findings of the research aimed at investigating the influence of visual content, posted on social media in shaping users' sentiments towards specific sociopolitical events. The study analyzed various sociopolitical topics by examining posts containing relevant hashtags and keywords, along with their associated images and comments. Using advanced machine learning and deep learning methods for sentiment analysis, textual data were classified to determine the expressed sentiments. Additionally, the correlation between posted visual content and user sentiments has been studied. A particular emphasis was placed on understanding how these visuals impact users' attitudes toward the events. The research resulted in a comprehensive dataset comprising labeled images and their comments, offering valuable insights into the dynamics of public opinion formation through social media. This study investigates the influence of social media images on user sentiment toward sociopolitical events using deep learning-based sentiment analysis. By analyzing posts from movements such as Black Lives Matter, Women's March, Climate Change Protests, and Anti-war Demonstrations, we identified a strong correlation between visual content and public sentiment. Our results reveal that Anti-war Demonstrations exhibit the highest correlation (PLCC: 0.709, SROCC: 0.723), while Climate Change Protests display the lowest alignment (PLCC: 0.531, SROCC: 0.611). Overall, the study finds a consistent positive correlation (PLCC range: 0.615-0.709, SROCC: 0.611-0.723) across movements, indicating the significant role of visual content in shaping the public opinion.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0326936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of the research aimed at investigating the influence of visual content, posted on social media in shaping users' sentiments towards specific sociopolitical events. The study analyzed various sociopolitical topics by examining posts containing relevant hashtags and keywords, along with their associated images and comments. Using advanced machine learning and deep learning methods for sentiment analysis, textual data were classified to determine the expressed sentiments. Additionally, the correlation between posted visual content and user sentiments has been studied. A particular emphasis was placed on understanding how these visuals impact users' attitudes toward the events. The research resulted in a comprehensive dataset comprising labeled images and their comments, offering valuable insights into the dynamics of public opinion formation through social media. This study investigates the influence of social media images on user sentiment toward sociopolitical events using deep learning-based sentiment analysis. By analyzing posts from movements such as Black Lives Matter, Women's March, Climate Change Protests, and Anti-war Demonstrations, we identified a strong correlation between visual content and public sentiment. Our results reveal that Anti-war Demonstrations exhibit the highest correlation (PLCC: 0.709, SROCC: 0.723), while Climate Change Protests display the lowest alignment (PLCC: 0.531, SROCC: 0.611). Overall, the study finds a consistent positive correlation (PLCC range: 0.615-0.709, SROCC: 0.611-0.723) across movements, indicating the significant role of visual content in shaping the public opinion.

基于深度人工智能,调查社交媒体图片对用户对社会政治事件情绪的影响。
本文介绍了研究的结果,旨在调查视觉内容的影响,发布在社交媒体上,在塑造用户对特定社会政治事件的情绪。这项研究通过检查包含相关标签和关键词的帖子,以及相关的图片和评论,分析了各种社会政治话题。使用先进的机器学习和深度学习方法进行情感分析,对文本数据进行分类以确定所表达的情感。此外,还研究了发布的视觉内容与用户情绪之间的相关性。特别强调的是理解这些视觉效果如何影响用户对事件的态度。这项研究产生了一个综合的数据集,包括标记的图像及其评论,为通过社交媒体形成公众舆论的动态提供了有价值的见解。本研究使用基于深度学习的情绪分析来调查社交媒体图像对用户对社会政治事件情绪的影响。通过分析诸如“黑人的命也是命”、“妇女游行”、“气候变化抗议”和“反战示威”等运动的帖子,我们发现了视觉内容与公众情绪之间的强烈相关性。结果表明,反战示威的相关系数最高(PLCC: 0.709, SROCC: 0.723),而气候变化抗议的相关系数最低(PLCC: 0.531, SROCC: 0.611)。总体而言,研究发现各运动之间存在一致的正相关(PLCC范围:0.615-0.709,SROCC范围:0.611-0.723),表明视觉内容在塑造公众舆论方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信