Positioning of Chinese time nouns and adverbs: Evidence from corpus, acceptability, and processing studies.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329271
Jia Yi Chen, Ying Su, Katsuo Tamaoka
{"title":"Positioning of Chinese time nouns and adverbs: Evidence from corpus, acceptability, and processing studies.","authors":"Jia Yi Chen, Ying Su, Katsuo Tamaoka","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0329271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the syntactic placement and cognitive processing of time nouns and time adverbs in Mandarin Chinese, a language without overt tense morphology, highlighting how these temporal expressions interface with Chinese grammar. Study 1 analyzed a large-scale natural language corpus (BLCU Chinese Corpus) to determine the typical positions of time nouns and time adverbs relative to the subject. The results revealed distinct distributional patterns: time nouns occurred flexibly either before or after the subject, while time adverbs appeared predominantly in post-subject (sentence-internal) positions. Study 2 investigated native Mandarin speakers' acceptability judgments of sentences with time expressions in various positions. Sentences in which time nouns followed the subject were rated as more acceptable and supported the canonical word order, whereas pre-subject time nouns were acceptable mainly in topicalized contexts. In contrast, time adverbs were strongly preferred in post-subject positions, with only a few exceptions where certain adverbs could be fronted. Study 3 examined the real-time comprehension of these structures using reaction time and accuracy. Results showed that sentences with time expressions in non-canonical positions incurred greater processing costs, while canonical post-subject placements facilitated faster and more accurate processing. These findings suggest that the human sentence processor is sensitive to structural preferences for temporal expressions, mirroring patterns in natural use and grammatical acceptability. By integrating corpus analysis, acceptability judgments, and psycholinguistic data, this study provides a comprehensive account of how time nouns and time adverbs are positioned and processed in Chinese, offering broader implications for understanding temporal reference in tenseless languages.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0329271"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the syntactic placement and cognitive processing of time nouns and time adverbs in Mandarin Chinese, a language without overt tense morphology, highlighting how these temporal expressions interface with Chinese grammar. Study 1 analyzed a large-scale natural language corpus (BLCU Chinese Corpus) to determine the typical positions of time nouns and time adverbs relative to the subject. The results revealed distinct distributional patterns: time nouns occurred flexibly either before or after the subject, while time adverbs appeared predominantly in post-subject (sentence-internal) positions. Study 2 investigated native Mandarin speakers' acceptability judgments of sentences with time expressions in various positions. Sentences in which time nouns followed the subject were rated as more acceptable and supported the canonical word order, whereas pre-subject time nouns were acceptable mainly in topicalized contexts. In contrast, time adverbs were strongly preferred in post-subject positions, with only a few exceptions where certain adverbs could be fronted. Study 3 examined the real-time comprehension of these structures using reaction time and accuracy. Results showed that sentences with time expressions in non-canonical positions incurred greater processing costs, while canonical post-subject placements facilitated faster and more accurate processing. These findings suggest that the human sentence processor is sensitive to structural preferences for temporal expressions, mirroring patterns in natural use and grammatical acceptability. By integrating corpus analysis, acceptability judgments, and psycholinguistic data, this study provides a comprehensive account of how time nouns and time adverbs are positioned and processed in Chinese, offering broader implications for understanding temporal reference in tenseless languages.

汉语时间名词和副词的定位:语料库证据、可接受性和加工研究。
本研究考察了时间名词和时间副词在没有明显时态形态的汉语普通话中的句法位置和认知加工,突出了这些时间表达与汉语语法的接口。研究1分析了一个大型自然语言语料库(BLCU汉语语料库),确定了时间名词和时间副词相对于主语的典型位置。结果表明:时间名词在主语前后灵活出现,而时间副词主要出现在主语后(句内)位置。研究二考察了汉语母语者对不同位置时间表达句子的可接受性判断。时间名词在主语之后的句子被认为更容易被接受,并且支持规范的词序,而主语前的时间名词主要在主题化的语境中被接受。相比之下,时间副词在后主语位置被强烈偏爱,只有少数例外,某些副词可以放在前面。研究3通过反应时间和准确性检验了对这些结构的实时理解。结果表明,时间表达在非规范位置的句子加工成本更高,而规范的后主语位置有利于更快、更准确的加工。这些发现表明,人类句子处理器对时态表达的结构偏好、自然使用的镜像模式和语法可接受性很敏感。本研究通过对语料库分析、可接受性判断和心理语言学数据的综合分析,对汉语中时间名词和时间副词的定位和加工过程进行了全面研究,为理解无时态语言中的时间指称提供了更广泛的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信