Assessing ventilatory efficiency at rest in asthma: A longitudinal comparison with healthy subjects.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Monique van Oosten, Arni Johnsen, Bjorn Magnusson, Marta Gudjonsdottir
{"title":"Assessing ventilatory efficiency at rest in asthma: A longitudinal comparison with healthy subjects.","authors":"Monique van Oosten, Arni Johnsen, Bjorn Magnusson, Marta Gudjonsdottir","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dysfunctional breathing, characterized by inefficient ventilation, is common among asthmatic patients. It is mainly identified using questionnaires and by observing breathing patterns, but the actual efficiency of ventilation is rarely evaluated. This study aimed to compare ventilatory efficiency at rest between asthmatic patients and healthy subjects, and to assess the stability of these parameters over 1 year. Ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>), respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (V<sub>T</sub>), carbon dioxide output (VCO<sub>2</sub>) and end-tidal partial pressure (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>), spirometry, and breath-holding time (BHT) were measured at baseline (M1) and 17-51 weeks later (M2). The ventilatory efficiency (V<sub>E</sub>/VCO<sub>2</sub>) and breathing pattern (RR/V<sub>T</sub>) were calculated. Patients took the Asthma Control Test questionnaire (ACT). A mixed-design ANOVA at M1 showed that 30 not well-controlled asthmatic patients according to ACT (77% females, 7 with airway obstruction), and 23 matched healthy subjects had similar breathing parameters, except for BHT (p < 0.02) and P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.06). Only BHT changed, that is, it increased from M1 to M2 in the groups and remained shorter among the patients. Despite a shorter BHT among the patients, indicating a heightened perceptual sensitivity for dyspnoea, the ventilatory efficiency and breathing pattern at rest were similar and remained stable for 1 year in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 15","pages":"e70490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dysfunctional breathing, characterized by inefficient ventilation, is common among asthmatic patients. It is mainly identified using questionnaires and by observing breathing patterns, but the actual efficiency of ventilation is rarely evaluated. This study aimed to compare ventilatory efficiency at rest between asthmatic patients and healthy subjects, and to assess the stability of these parameters over 1 year. Ventilation (VE), respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), carbon dioxide output (VCO2) and end-tidal partial pressure (PETCO2), spirometry, and breath-holding time (BHT) were measured at baseline (M1) and 17-51 weeks later (M2). The ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) and breathing pattern (RR/VT) were calculated. Patients took the Asthma Control Test questionnaire (ACT). A mixed-design ANOVA at M1 showed that 30 not well-controlled asthmatic patients according to ACT (77% females, 7 with airway obstruction), and 23 matched healthy subjects had similar breathing parameters, except for BHT (p < 0.02) and PETCO2 (p = 0.06). Only BHT changed, that is, it increased from M1 to M2 in the groups and remained shorter among the patients. Despite a shorter BHT among the patients, indicating a heightened perceptual sensitivity for dyspnoea, the ventilatory efficiency and breathing pattern at rest were similar and remained stable for 1 year in both groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估哮喘患者休息时的通气效率:与健康受试者的纵向比较。
呼吸功能障碍在哮喘患者中很常见,其特征是通气效率低下。它主要通过问卷调查和观察呼吸模式来确定,但很少评估通风的实际效率。本研究旨在比较哮喘患者和健康受试者休息时的通气效率,并评估这些参数在1年内的稳定性。在基线(M1)和17-51周后(M2)测量通气量(VE)、呼吸速率(RR)、潮气量(VT)、二氧化碳排出量(VCO2)和潮末分压(PETCO2)、肺活量测定和屏气时间(BHT)。计算换气效率(VE/VCO2)和呼吸方式(RR/VT)。患者采用哮喘控制测试问卷(ACT)。M1的混合设计方差分析显示,30例根据ACT控制不良的哮喘患者(77%为女性,7例为气道阻塞)和23例匹配的健康受试者除BHT (p ETCO2 (p = 0.06)外,呼吸参数相似。只有BHT发生了变化,即在组内从M1增加到M2,在患者中保持较短。尽管患者的BHT较短,表明对呼吸困难的感知敏感性较高,但两组的呼吸效率和呼吸方式相似,并在1年内保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信