Comparative effectiveness and safety of insulin reference biologics versus biosimilars for types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a systematic review of real-world studies.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329299
Martin K H Ho, Araniy Santhireswaran, Tara Gomes, Muhammad Mamdani, Mina Tadrous
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness and safety of insulin reference biologics versus biosimilars for types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a systematic review of real-world studies.","authors":"Martin K H Ho, Araniy Santhireswaran, Tara Gomes, Muhammad Mamdani, Mina Tadrous","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0329299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin deficiency or resistance. The two main types of diabetes mellitus are type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM). Insulin is the mainstay of therapy for T1DM and often the last-line therapy for T2DM. Biosimilar insulins are cost-saving alternatives to reference products that may improve access for patients and sustainability for healthcare systems. Despite supporting evidence from randomized controlled trials, biosimilar insulin uptake is poor, and real-world evidence of their safety and effectiveness is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective is to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin biosimilars versus reference products in adults with diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We will include observational studies and open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trials. We will exclude other randomized controlled trials, literature reviews, meta-analyses, case series, case reports, study protocols, opinion pieces, and conference abstracts. Our primary effectiveness outcome will be glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and our primary safety outcome will be hypoglycemia. Our secondary outcomes will include fasting plasma glucose; time in range; microvascular complications; health-related quality of life; physician visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis; weight gain; immunogenicity; injection site reactions; and incident cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy combines three key concepts: diabetes, insulin, and biosimilars. We will conduct a structured search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. We will also search in grey literature databases, targeted websites, and the Google search engine. Finally, we will scan forward and backward citations. Articles will be screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two reviewers. Data will be descriptively summarized.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our systematic review of the real-world evidence on biosimilar insulins can help support clinical and policy decisions that impact the care of patients with T1DM or T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0329299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin deficiency or resistance. The two main types of diabetes mellitus are type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM). Insulin is the mainstay of therapy for T1DM and often the last-line therapy for T2DM. Biosimilar insulins are cost-saving alternatives to reference products that may improve access for patients and sustainability for healthcare systems. Despite supporting evidence from randomized controlled trials, biosimilar insulin uptake is poor, and real-world evidence of their safety and effectiveness is limited.

Objective: Our objective is to compare the real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin biosimilars versus reference products in adults with diabetes mellitus.

Eligibility criteria: We will include observational studies and open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trials. We will exclude other randomized controlled trials, literature reviews, meta-analyses, case series, case reports, study protocols, opinion pieces, and conference abstracts. Our primary effectiveness outcome will be glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and our primary safety outcome will be hypoglycemia. Our secondary outcomes will include fasting plasma glucose; time in range; microvascular complications; health-related quality of life; physician visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis; weight gain; immunogenicity; injection site reactions; and incident cancers.

Methods: The search strategy combines three key concepts: diabetes, insulin, and biosimilars. We will conduct a structured search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts. We will also search in grey literature databases, targeted websites, and the Google search engine. Finally, we will scan forward and backward citations. Articles will be screened, extracted, and appraised independently by two reviewers. Data will be descriptively summarized.

Discussion: Our systematic review of the real-world evidence on biosimilar insulins can help support clinical and policy decisions that impact the care of patients with T1DM or T2DM.

1型和2型糖尿病胰岛素参考生物制剂与生物仿制药的有效性和安全性比较:现实世界研究的系统回顾方案
糖尿病以胰岛素缺乏或胰岛素抵抗为特征。糖尿病的两种主要类型是1型(T1DM)和2型(T2DM)。胰岛素是治疗1型糖尿病的主要药物,也是治疗2型糖尿病的最后一线药物。生物类似药胰岛素是参考产品的成本节约替代品,可以改善患者的可及性和卫生保健系统的可持续性。尽管有随机对照试验的支持证据,但生物类似药胰岛素的摄取很差,而且其安全性和有效性的实际证据有限。目的:我们的目的是比较胰岛素生物仿制药与参考产品在成人糖尿病患者中的实际有效性和安全性。入选标准:纳入观察性研究和开放标签实用随机对照试验。我们将排除其他随机对照试验、文献综述、荟萃分析、病例系列、病例报告、研究方案、意见文章和会议摘要。我们的主要有效性终点是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),而我们的主要安全性终点是低血糖。我们的次要结局包括空腹血糖;时间:范围内的时间;微血管并发症;与健康有关的生活质量;因低血糖、高血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒就诊、急诊和住院;体重增加;免疫原性;注射部位反应;还有癌症。方法:该搜索策略结合了三个关键概念:糖尿病、胰岛素和生物类似药。我们将在MEDLINE, EMBASE和国际药物摘要中进行结构化搜索。我们还将在灰色文献数据库、目标网站和谷歌搜索引擎中进行搜索。最后,我们将向前和向后扫描引文。文章将由两名审稿人独立筛选、提取和评估。将对数据进行描述性总结。讨论:我们对生物类似胰岛素的真实证据进行系统回顾,可以帮助支持影响T1DM或T2DM患者护理的临床和政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信