A Scoping Review of Quasi-experimental Studies on Simulation-Based Learning in Medical Education: Trends and Insights from the Last Decade.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.39.70
Zohreh Sohrabi, Samane Ghasemi, Zahra Nouri Khaneghah, Azizeh Barry, Akram Zhianifard, Sohrab Nosrati
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Quasi-experimental Studies on Simulation-Based Learning in Medical Education: Trends and Insights from the Last Decade.","authors":"Zohreh Sohrabi, Samane Ghasemi, Zahra Nouri Khaneghah, Azizeh Barry, Akram Zhianifard, Sohrab Nosrati","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based learning (SBL) has become a key tool in medical education for developing practical skills and clinical decision-making. Despite the widespread use of this method, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews of quasi-experimental studies in this area. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the trends and insights from quasi-experimental studies conducted over the past decade on simulation-based learning in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was conducted using the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley, involving 5 key stages: (1) defining the research questions; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) extracting relevant data; and (5) summarizing and synthesizing the extracted data. Several databases were used to search for articles. These databases include PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), ERIC, and Emerald. The search period spanned from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this scoping review, 3052 articles were retrieved. After screening and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 95 quasi-experimental articles were selected for final analysis. Basic medical education dominates research focus, and surgical training and obstetric care had the lowest concentration of studies. Simulation effectiveness is measured via Kirkpatrick's hierarchy, showing improvements in clinical skills and confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review demonstrated that simulation-based learning is a growing educational method in medical education, contributing to the development of practical and clinical skills. The findings of this study can be beneficial for policymakers, educators, and researchers in medical education to enhance educational programs and utilize this method more effectively. It is recommended that adequate resources and proper training be allocated to maximize the effectiveness of simulation-based learning for both educators and students.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based learning (SBL) has become a key tool in medical education for developing practical skills and clinical decision-making. Despite the widespread use of this method, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews of quasi-experimental studies in this area. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the trends and insights from quasi-experimental studies conducted over the past decade on simulation-based learning in medical education.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted using the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley, involving 5 key stages: (1) defining the research questions; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) selecting studies; (4) extracting relevant data; and (5) summarizing and synthesizing the extracted data. Several databases were used to search for articles. These databases include PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), ERIC, and Emerald. The search period spanned from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2024.

Results: In this scoping review, 3052 articles were retrieved. After screening and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 95 quasi-experimental articles were selected for final analysis. Basic medical education dominates research focus, and surgical training and obstetric care had the lowest concentration of studies. Simulation effectiveness is measured via Kirkpatrick's hierarchy, showing improvements in clinical skills and confidence.

Conclusion: This scoping review demonstrated that simulation-based learning is a growing educational method in medical education, contributing to the development of practical and clinical skills. The findings of this study can be beneficial for policymakers, educators, and researchers in medical education to enhance educational programs and utilize this method more effectively. It is recommended that adequate resources and proper training be allocated to maximize the effectiveness of simulation-based learning for both educators and students.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医学教育中基于模拟学习的准实验研究的范围综述:过去十年的趋势和见解。
背景:基于模拟的学习(SBL)已经成为医学教育中培养实践技能和临床决策的关键工具。尽管这种方法被广泛使用,但仍缺乏对该领域准实验研究的全面综述。因此,本研究旨在调查过去十年在医学教育模拟学习方面进行的准实验研究的趋势和见解。方法:本综述采用Arksey和O'Malley概述的框架进行,涉及5个关键阶段:(1)确定研究问题;(2)确定相关研究;(3)选择研究;(4)提取相关数据;(5)对提取的数据进行汇总和综合。几个数据库被用来搜索文章。这些数据库包括PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science (WOS)、ERIC和Emerald。搜索时间为2014年1月1日至2024年12月31日。结果:在此范围综述中,检索到3052篇文章。筛选并应用纳入、排除标准后,选取95篇准实验文章进行最终分析。基础医学教育是研究重点,外科培训和产科护理的研究集中程度最低。模拟效果是通过柯克帕特里克的层次来衡量的,显示了临床技能和信心的提高。结论:这一范围综述表明,基于模拟的学习是医学教育中一种日益增长的教育方法,有助于实践和临床技能的发展。本研究结果可为医学教育的决策者、教育工作者及研究人员改善教育计划及更有效地利用此方法提供参考。建议分配足够的资源和适当的培训,以最大限度地提高基于模拟的学习对教育工作者和学生的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信