Evaluation of a quantitative radiographic technique for differentiating normal and unilateral luxation of sacroiliac joints in cats: a pilot study analysis.
T Kasa, A Danielski, M A Solano, F Santoro, V Volckaert
{"title":"Evaluation of a quantitative radiographic technique for differentiating normal and unilateral luxation of sacroiliac joints in cats: a pilot study analysis.","authors":"T Kasa, A Danielski, M A Solano, F Santoro, V Volckaert","doi":"10.1111/jsap.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate a radiographic technique for differentiating normal feline sacroiliac joints from those with unilateral luxation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty normal feline pelvic radiographs (control group) and 50 radiographs with unilateral sacroiliac luxation (luxation group) were assessed. Three angles were measured on each radiograph using a reference line connecting the most cranial aspect of the iliac wings and three anatomical landmarks: the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7. Study feasibility was assessed by a single observer on 20 radiographs per group. In the second phase, measurements were obtained from 30 radiographs per group and recorded twice by three blinded observers, with a 4-week interval between assessments. Angular differences between groups were analysed, along with optimal cut-off values, diagnostic performance and inter- and intra-observer reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three measured angles were significantly smaller in the control group than in the luxation group. Specifically, angular measurements exceeding 2.3° at the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, and 2.4° at both the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7, were indicative of unilateral sacroiliac luxation. The respective sensitivity and specificity values of the aforementioned cut-off angles were 90% and 97% for the first, 90% and 94% for the second and 86% and 94% for the third. These thresholds were associated with consistently high inter- and intra-observer reliability.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These proposed angular cut-offs provide a reliable diagnostic criterion for identifying unilateral sacroiliac luxation in cats and may enhance diagnostic confidence and accuracy, particularly in primary care settings where radiography remains the preferred imaging modality for feline pelvic injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate a radiographic technique for differentiating normal feline sacroiliac joints from those with unilateral luxation.
Materials and methods: Fifty normal feline pelvic radiographs (control group) and 50 radiographs with unilateral sacroiliac luxation (luxation group) were assessed. Three angles were measured on each radiograph using a reference line connecting the most cranial aspect of the iliac wings and three anatomical landmarks: the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7. Study feasibility was assessed by a single observer on 20 radiographs per group. In the second phase, measurements were obtained from 30 radiographs per group and recorded twice by three blinded observers, with a 4-week interval between assessments. Angular differences between groups were analysed, along with optimal cut-off values, diagnostic performance and inter- and intra-observer reliability.
Results: All three measured angles were significantly smaller in the control group than in the luxation group. Specifically, angular measurements exceeding 2.3° at the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, and 2.4° at both the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7, were indicative of unilateral sacroiliac luxation. The respective sensitivity and specificity values of the aforementioned cut-off angles were 90% and 97% for the first, 90% and 94% for the second and 86% and 94% for the third. These thresholds were associated with consistently high inter- and intra-observer reliability.
Clinical significance: These proposed angular cut-offs provide a reliable diagnostic criterion for identifying unilateral sacroiliac luxation in cats and may enhance diagnostic confidence and accuracy, particularly in primary care settings where radiography remains the preferred imaging modality for feline pelvic injuries.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association