Evaluation of a quantitative radiographic technique for differentiating normal and unilateral luxation of sacroiliac joints in cats: a pilot study analysis.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
T Kasa, A Danielski, M A Solano, F Santoro, V Volckaert
{"title":"Evaluation of a quantitative radiographic technique for differentiating normal and unilateral luxation of sacroiliac joints in cats: a pilot study analysis.","authors":"T Kasa, A Danielski, M A Solano, F Santoro, V Volckaert","doi":"10.1111/jsap.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate a radiographic technique for differentiating normal feline sacroiliac joints from those with unilateral luxation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty normal feline pelvic radiographs (control group) and 50 radiographs with unilateral sacroiliac luxation (luxation group) were assessed. Three angles were measured on each radiograph using a reference line connecting the most cranial aspect of the iliac wings and three anatomical landmarks: the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7. Study feasibility was assessed by a single observer on 20 radiographs per group. In the second phase, measurements were obtained from 30 radiographs per group and recorded twice by three blinded observers, with a 4-week interval between assessments. Angular differences between groups were analysed, along with optimal cut-off values, diagnostic performance and inter- and intra-observer reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three measured angles were significantly smaller in the control group than in the luxation group. Specifically, angular measurements exceeding 2.3° at the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, and 2.4° at both the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7, were indicative of unilateral sacroiliac luxation. The respective sensitivity and specificity values of the aforementioned cut-off angles were 90% and 97% for the first, 90% and 94% for the second and 86% and 94% for the third. These thresholds were associated with consistently high inter- and intra-observer reliability.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>These proposed angular cut-offs provide a reliable diagnostic criterion for identifying unilateral sacroiliac luxation in cats and may enhance diagnostic confidence and accuracy, particularly in primary care settings where radiography remains the preferred imaging modality for feline pelvic injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate a radiographic technique for differentiating normal feline sacroiliac joints from those with unilateral luxation.

Materials and methods: Fifty normal feline pelvic radiographs (control group) and 50 radiographs with unilateral sacroiliac luxation (luxation group) were assessed. Three angles were measured on each radiograph using a reference line connecting the most cranial aspect of the iliac wings and three anatomical landmarks: the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7. Study feasibility was assessed by a single observer on 20 radiographs per group. In the second phase, measurements were obtained from 30 radiographs per group and recorded twice by three blinded observers, with a 4-week interval between assessments. Angular differences between groups were analysed, along with optimal cut-off values, diagnostic performance and inter- and intra-observer reliability.

Results: All three measured angles were significantly smaller in the control group than in the luxation group. Specifically, angular measurements exceeding 2.3° at the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 6, and 2.4° at both the caudal endplate of lumbar vertebra 6 and the cranial endplate of lumbar vertebra 7, were indicative of unilateral sacroiliac luxation. The respective sensitivity and specificity values of the aforementioned cut-off angles were 90% and 97% for the first, 90% and 94% for the second and 86% and 94% for the third. These thresholds were associated with consistently high inter- and intra-observer reliability.

Clinical significance: These proposed angular cut-offs provide a reliable diagnostic criterion for identifying unilateral sacroiliac luxation in cats and may enhance diagnostic confidence and accuracy, particularly in primary care settings where radiography remains the preferred imaging modality for feline pelvic injuries.

鉴别猫骶髂关节正常脱位和单侧脱位的定量放射技术评价:一项初步研究分析。
目的:本研究的目的是评估一种用于区分正常猫骶髂关节与单侧脱位的x线摄影技术。材料与方法:选取50张正常猫骨盆片(对照组)和50张单侧骶髂脱位片(脱位组)。在每张x线片上测量三个角度,使用连接髂翼最颅面和三个解剖标志的参考线:腰椎6的颅终板、腰椎6的尾终板和腰椎7的颅终板。研究的可行性由一名观察员对每组20张x光片进行评估。在第二阶段,从每组30张x光片中获得测量结果,并由三名盲法观察者记录两次,评估间隔4周。分析各组之间的角度差异,以及最佳临界值,诊断性能和观察者之间和内部的可靠性。结果:对照组三个测量角度均明显小于脱位组。具体来说,6号腰椎颅终板的角度测量值超过2.3°,6号腰椎尾终板和7号腰椎颅终板的角度测量值均超过2.4°,表明单侧骶髂脱位。上述三种截止角度的灵敏度和特异度分别为:第一种为90%和97%,第二种为90%和94%,第三种为86%和94%。这些阈值与观察者之间和观察者内部的高信度一致相关。临床意义:这些建议的角度切断线为识别猫单侧骶髂脱位提供了可靠的诊断标准,并可能提高诊断的信心和准确性,特别是在初级保健机构中,x线摄影仍然是猫骨盆损伤的首选成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Small Animal Practice
Journal of Small Animal Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery. In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world. The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher. The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信