Prebiotic potential of proso millet and quinoa: Effects on gut microbiota composition and functional metabolic pathways.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.71150/jm.2503002
Jinwoo Kim, Jiwoon Kim, Yewon Jung, Gyungcheon Kim, Seongok Kim, Hakdong Shin
{"title":"Prebiotic potential of proso millet and quinoa: Effects on gut microbiota composition and functional metabolic pathways.","authors":"Jinwoo Kim, Jiwoon Kim, Yewon Jung, Gyungcheon Kim, Seongok Kim, Hakdong Shin","doi":"10.71150/jm.2503002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prebiotics are indigestible dietary components that improve host health by stimulating the growth and metabolic activity of beneficial intestinal microbes. The whole grains are rich in non-digestible carbohydrates, which may confer prebiotic potential. Among them, millet and quinoa have gained attention as dietary alternatives due to the growing popularity of gluten-free diets. In this study, we examined the effects of proso millet and quinoa on the human gut microbiota using an in vitro fecal incubation model. Both grains altered alpha diversity metrics, including microbial richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity. Beta diversity analysis showed that the proso millet and quinoa treatment groups exhibited distinct clustering patterns compared to the control, highlighting their impact on microbial community structure. Taxonomic analysis showed an increase in beneficial genera, including Bifidobacterium, and a decrease in taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and Flavonifractor. To assess metabolic changes associated with microbial fermentation, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) intensities were measured. The intensities of acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid were significantly higher in the proso millet- and quinoa-treated groups compared to the control group. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Blautia were significantly positively associated with SCFA intensities. Furthermore, predicted functional pathway analysis identified enrichment of carbohydrate-related pathways in proso millet and quinoa treatments. Quinoa supplementation led to a broader enhancement of metabolic pathways, including glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, and pentose phosphate pathways, whereas proso millet enriched galactose metabolism, and starch and sucrose metabolism. These findings suggest that proso millet and quinoa influence gut microbial diversity, composition, and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology","volume":"63 7","pages":"e2503002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71150/jm.2503002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prebiotics are indigestible dietary components that improve host health by stimulating the growth and metabolic activity of beneficial intestinal microbes. The whole grains are rich in non-digestible carbohydrates, which may confer prebiotic potential. Among them, millet and quinoa have gained attention as dietary alternatives due to the growing popularity of gluten-free diets. In this study, we examined the effects of proso millet and quinoa on the human gut microbiota using an in vitro fecal incubation model. Both grains altered alpha diversity metrics, including microbial richness, evenness, and phylogenetic diversity. Beta diversity analysis showed that the proso millet and quinoa treatment groups exhibited distinct clustering patterns compared to the control, highlighting their impact on microbial community structure. Taxonomic analysis showed an increase in beneficial genera, including Bifidobacterium, and a decrease in taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and Flavonifractor. To assess metabolic changes associated with microbial fermentation, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) intensities were measured. The intensities of acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid were significantly higher in the proso millet- and quinoa-treated groups compared to the control group. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the abundances of Bifidobacterium and Blautia were significantly positively associated with SCFA intensities. Furthermore, predicted functional pathway analysis identified enrichment of carbohydrate-related pathways in proso millet and quinoa treatments. Quinoa supplementation led to a broader enhancement of metabolic pathways, including glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, and pentose phosphate pathways, whereas proso millet enriched galactose metabolism, and starch and sucrose metabolism. These findings suggest that proso millet and quinoa influence gut microbial diversity, composition, and function.

小米和藜麦的益生元潜力:对肠道菌群组成和功能代谢途径的影响。
益生元是一种不易消化的膳食成分,通过刺激有益肠道微生物的生长和代谢活性来改善宿主的健康。全谷物富含不可消化的碳水化合物,这可能赋予益生元的潜力。其中,由于无麸质饮食的日益普及,小米和藜麦作为饮食替代品受到了关注。在这项研究中,我们通过体外粪便培养模型研究了proso millet和quinoa对人类肠道微生物群的影响。两种谷物都改变了α多样性指标,包括微生物丰富度、均匀度和系统发育多样性。β多样性分析表明,与对照组相比,谷子和藜麦处理组表现出明显的聚类模式,突出了其对微生物群落结构的影响。分类分析显示,双歧杆菌等有益菌群数量增加,肠杆菌科、黄酮因子等有益菌群数量减少。为了评估与微生物发酵相关的代谢变化,测量了短链脂肪酸(SCFA)的强度。与对照组相比,谷子和藜麦处理组的乙酸、丙酸和丁酸强度显著升高。Spearman相关分析表明,双歧杆菌和蓝藻菌的丰度与SCFA强度呈显著正相关。此外,预测功能通路分析发现,在玉米谷子和藜麦处理中,碳水化合物相关通路富集。藜麦的补充导致了代谢途径的广泛增强,包括糖酵解/糖异生、淀粉和蔗糖代谢以及戊糖磷酸途径,而proso millet则增强了半乳糖代谢、淀粉和蔗糖代谢。这些发现表明,小米和藜麦会影响肠道微生物的多样性、组成和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology
Journal of Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Publishes papers that deal with research on microorganisms, including archaea, bacteria, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, protozoa, and simple eukaryotic microorganisms. Topics considered for publication include Microbial Systematics, Evolutionary Microbiology, Microbial Ecology, Environmental Microbiology, Microbial Genetics, Genomics, Molecular Biology, Microbial Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbial Pathogenesis, Host-Microbe Interaction, Systems Microbiology, Synthetic Microbiology, Bioinformatics and Virology. Manuscripts dealing with simple identification of microorganism(s), cloning of a known gene and its expression in a microbial host, and clinical statistics will not be considered for publication by JM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信