Radiotherapy Boost to Clinically Positive Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes: An Effective Non-Surgical Alternative?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Caglayan Selenge Beduk Esen, Yasin Ozyurek, Sezin Yuce Sari, Melis Gultekin, Gokhan Ozyigit, Ferah Yildiz
{"title":"Radiotherapy Boost to Clinically Positive Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes: An Effective Non-Surgical Alternative?","authors":"Caglayan Selenge Beduk Esen, Yasin Ozyurek, Sezin Yuce Sari, Melis Gultekin, Gokhan Ozyigit, Ferah Yildiz","doi":"10.4048/jbc.2024.0304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of radiation therapy (RT) boost sequences and doses to internal mammary (IM) lymph nodes (LNs) on oncologic outcomes and toxicity in patients with clinically IMLN-positive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients with positive IMLNs at diagnosis who were treated between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. After systemic therapy and surgery, RT was applied to the whole breast or chest wall, including the axillary, supraclavicular, and IM lymphatics. An RT boost to the IMLNs was administered either sequentially or as a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and toxicity profiles were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) in metastatic IMLNs were observed in 17 patients (65.4%) and 5 patients (19.2%) following systemic therapy, respectively. One patient (3.8%) had stable disease, while two patients (7.7%) experienced disease progression in the IMLNs.After a median follow-up of 67 months, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or both occurred in 1 (3.8%), 1 (3.8%), and 2 (7.7%) patients, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 86.7% and 76.4%, respectively. The absence of extracapsular extension in axillary LNs was associated with improved OS and DFS. A CR or PR to systemic treatment in IMLNs was associated with improved DFS only. The boost sequence had no significant effect on survival, organ-at-risk doses, or cardiac toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An RT boost to IMLNs without surgical resection provides excellent oncologic outcomes with acceptable toxicity. While the SIB technique reduces the number of treatment fractions, it did not result in superior oncologic outcomes compared to the sequential boost. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of RT boost sequencing to the IMLNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2024.0304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of radiation therapy (RT) boost sequences and doses to internal mammary (IM) lymph nodes (LNs) on oncologic outcomes and toxicity in patients with clinically IMLN-positive breast cancer.

Methods: Twenty-six patients with positive IMLNs at diagnosis who were treated between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. After systemic therapy and surgery, RT was applied to the whole breast or chest wall, including the axillary, supraclavicular, and IM lymphatics. An RT boost to the IMLNs was administered either sequentially or as a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). Treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and toxicity profiles were analyzed.

Results: A complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) in metastatic IMLNs were observed in 17 patients (65.4%) and 5 patients (19.2%) following systemic therapy, respectively. One patient (3.8%) had stable disease, while two patients (7.7%) experienced disease progression in the IMLNs.After a median follow-up of 67 months, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, or both occurred in 1 (3.8%), 1 (3.8%), and 2 (7.7%) patients, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 86.7% and 76.4%, respectively. The absence of extracapsular extension in axillary LNs was associated with improved OS and DFS. A CR or PR to systemic treatment in IMLNs was associated with improved DFS only. The boost sequence had no significant effect on survival, organ-at-risk doses, or cardiac toxicity.

Conclusion: An RT boost to IMLNs without surgical resection provides excellent oncologic outcomes with acceptable toxicity. While the SIB technique reduces the number of treatment fractions, it did not result in superior oncologic outcomes compared to the sequential boost. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the role of RT boost sequencing to the IMLNs.

放疗促进临床阳性内乳淋巴结:一种有效的非手术选择?
目的:评价内乳淋巴结(IM)放疗增强序列和剂量对临床imln阳性乳腺癌患者肿瘤预后和毒性的影响。方法:回顾性分析2013年至2022年间治疗的26例确诊IMLNs阳性患者。全身治疗和手术后,RT应用于整个乳房或胸壁,包括腋窝、锁骨上和IM淋巴。对imml进行RT增强,可以顺序进行,也可以同时进行综合增强(SIB)。分析了治疗结果、预后因素和毒性概况。结果:17例(65.4%)患者和5例(19.2%)患者在接受全身治疗后出现完全缓解(CR)和部分缓解(PR)。1例患者(3.8%)病情稳定,2例患者(7.7%)在IMLNs中出现疾病进展。中位随访67个月后,分别有1例(3.8%)、1例(3.8%)和2例(7.7%)患者出现了局部复发、远处转移或两者兼有。5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为86.7%和76.4%。腋窝LNs无囊外延伸与OS和DFS改善相关。在IMLNs中,CR或PR仅与改善的DFS相关。增强序列对存活、器官危险剂量或心脏毒性没有显著影响。结论:在不进行手术切除的情况下,对IMLNs进行放疗可提供良好的肿瘤预后和可接受的毒性。虽然SIB技术减少了治疗部分的数量,但与连续增强相比,它并没有带来更好的肿瘤预后。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来研究RT增强测序对IMLNs的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Breast Cancer (abbreviated as ''J Breast Cancer'') is the official journal of the Korean Breast Cancer Society, which is issued quarterly in the last day of March, June, September, and December each year since 1998. All the contents of the Journal is available online at the official journal website (http://ejbc.kr) under open access policy. The journal aims to provide a forum for the academic communication between medical doctors, basic science researchers, and health care professionals to be interested in breast cancer. To get this aim, we publish original investigations, review articles, brief communications including case reports, editorial opinions on the topics of importance to breast cancer, and welcome new research findings and epidemiological studies, especially when they contain a regional data to grab the international reader''s interest. Although the journal is mainly dealing with the issues of breast cancer, rare cases among benign breast diseases or evidence-based scientifically written articles providing useful information for clinical practice can be published as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信