Innovating reproductive health education: testing the concept of reproductive identity.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2025.2533256
Yasmin Butt, Lisa Sholomon, Kelly Moffitt-Hawasly, Gwen Walsh, Diana McGlory, Taylor D Orlandoni, Riddhi Sandil, Aurélie Athan
{"title":"Innovating reproductive health education: testing the concept of reproductive identity.","authors":"Yasmin Butt, Lisa Sholomon, Kelly Moffitt-Hawasly, Gwen Walsh, Diana McGlory, Taylor D Orlandoni, Riddhi Sandil, Aurélie Athan","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2025.2533256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education in the United States has undergone significant change in the past fifty years, driven by shifting global fertility trends and an increased emphasis on identity-related topics. It has traditionally emphasized biological function, disease prevention, and risk reduction, often overlooking identity development and the psychosocial dimensions of reproductive decision-making. Reproductive Identity (RI) is an emerging construct that may provide a new direction that expands SRH education by integrating reproductive self-concept, future reproductive intentions and social justice perspectives that is strengths-based and inclusive of all genders and sexualities. This study examined how SRH educators conceptualize RI, its perceived novelty, familiarity and relevance for SRH curricula, and its alignment with the National Sex Education Standards (NSES). A mixed methods design analyzed survey responses from SRH educators who participated in a fully-funded, six-week, online professional development training programme in RI. Findings indicate that while RI was largely unfamiliar pre-training (62%), it was considered somewhat novel (65%) and relevant (78%) for SRH curricula post-training. Thematic analysis of pre- and post-training responses demonstrated that educators shifted their conceptualizations of RI from viewing RI through biologically-oriented perspectives to recognizing its broader relevance to self-concept, decision-making and reproductive justice. Although RI demonstrated partial alignment with the NSES, gaps remained in areas such as reproductive life planning and future parenting intentions. RI complements existing approaches by addressing the psychosocial and developmental aspects of reproductive decision-making. While RI has not yet been tested with adolescents, the parallel learning process observed among educators suggests its feasibility for integration into SRH curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2533256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2533256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education in the United States has undergone significant change in the past fifty years, driven by shifting global fertility trends and an increased emphasis on identity-related topics. It has traditionally emphasized biological function, disease prevention, and risk reduction, often overlooking identity development and the psychosocial dimensions of reproductive decision-making. Reproductive Identity (RI) is an emerging construct that may provide a new direction that expands SRH education by integrating reproductive self-concept, future reproductive intentions and social justice perspectives that is strengths-based and inclusive of all genders and sexualities. This study examined how SRH educators conceptualize RI, its perceived novelty, familiarity and relevance for SRH curricula, and its alignment with the National Sex Education Standards (NSES). A mixed methods design analyzed survey responses from SRH educators who participated in a fully-funded, six-week, online professional development training programme in RI. Findings indicate that while RI was largely unfamiliar pre-training (62%), it was considered somewhat novel (65%) and relevant (78%) for SRH curricula post-training. Thematic analysis of pre- and post-training responses demonstrated that educators shifted their conceptualizations of RI from viewing RI through biologically-oriented perspectives to recognizing its broader relevance to self-concept, decision-making and reproductive justice. Although RI demonstrated partial alignment with the NSES, gaps remained in areas such as reproductive life planning and future parenting intentions. RI complements existing approaches by addressing the psychosocial and developmental aspects of reproductive decision-making. While RI has not yet been tested with adolescents, the parallel learning process observed among educators suggests its feasibility for integration into SRH curricula.

创新生殖健康教育:检验生殖身份观念。
在过去五十年中,由于全球生育率趋势的变化和对身份相关主题的日益重视,美国的性健康和生殖健康教育发生了重大变化。传统上强调生物功能、疾病预防和减少风险,往往忽视了身份发展和生殖决策的社会心理层面。生殖认同(Reproductive Identity, RI)是一个新兴的概念,它通过整合生殖自我概念、未来生殖意图和社会正义视角,以优势为基础,包容所有性别和性取向,为扩大生殖健康教育提供了新的方向。本研究考察了性教育工作者如何将性教育概念化,其对性教育课程的新颖性、熟悉性和相关性,以及其与国家性教育标准(NSES)的一致性。一项混合方法设计分析了参与国际扶轮全额资助、为期六周的线上专业发展训练计划的SRH教育者的调查回应。研究结果表明,虽然RI在培训前(62%)基本上是不熟悉的,但在培训后的SRH课程中,它被认为是新颖的(65%)和相关的(78%)。对训练前和训练后反应的专题分析显示,教育者转变了他们对国际扶轮的概念,从以生物学为导向的观点来看待国际扶轮,认识到其与自我概念、决策和生殖正义的更广泛的相关性。虽然RI显示出部分与国家社会战略一致,但在生殖生活计划和未来育儿意图等领域仍然存在差距。国际扶轮通过处理生殖决策的社会心理和发展方面来补充现有的方法。虽然还没有在青少年中测试过这种学习方法,但在教育工作者中观察到的平行学习过程表明,将这种方法纳入性健康与生殖健康课程是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信