Efficacy and safety of commercially available cosmetic perioperative skincare products for non-invasive energy-based device treatment: a single-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Yiyu Wang, Jing Ning, Jie Zhu, Xi Fang, Yusheng Lee, Chungan Liao, Xinyuan Zhang, Wei Liu, Yanyun Ma
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of commercially available cosmetic perioperative skincare products for non-invasive energy-based device treatment: a single-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Yiyu Wang, Jing Ning, Jie Zhu, Xi Fang, Yusheng Lee, Chungan Liao, Xinyuan Zhang, Wei Liu, Yanyun Ma","doi":"10.1684/ejd.2025.4890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photoelectric therapies (or non-invasive energy-based device treatment), especially picosecond lasers and intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments, are widely used to manage various cutaneous conditions, including pigmentation, inflammation, and signs of aging. However, these treatments can also impair the integrity of the skin barrier, making post-treatment repair of skin barrier function essential to maintain perioperative curative effects. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Eucerin® UltraSensitive Soothing Care Gel (GEL) and co-use of GEL and Eucerin® UltraSensitive Repair Intensive Source Serum (CO-USE) during the perioperative procedure. This study was designed with a four-week follow-up period, in which the first two weeks represented a pre-treatment phase. Self-assessment, clinical evaluation, and non-invasive skin testing were used at each visit after treatments to determine the efficacy of the two products. Compared to the placebo (PBO) group, both the GEL and CO-USE groups exhibited a significantly greater reduction in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and a notable increase in stratum corneum hydration (SCH) 24 hours post treatment. Regarding facial redness, there was a significantly greater decrease in the GEL and CO-USE groups compared to the PBO group at all follow-up time points on the picosecond laser side. Moreover, the CO-USE group showed superior efficacy in alleviating skin sensitivity symptoms following the interventions. Both products were well tolerated and exhibited favourable safety profiles. Both commercially available skincare products tested in the present study were found to be clinically effective in inhibiting laser-induced skin barrier damage, and reducing skin redness and skin sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11968,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dermatology","volume":"35 3","pages":"209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2025.4890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photoelectric therapies (or non-invasive energy-based device treatment), especially picosecond lasers and intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments, are widely used to manage various cutaneous conditions, including pigmentation, inflammation, and signs of aging. However, these treatments can also impair the integrity of the skin barrier, making post-treatment repair of skin barrier function essential to maintain perioperative curative effects. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Eucerin® UltraSensitive Soothing Care Gel (GEL) and co-use of GEL and Eucerin® UltraSensitive Repair Intensive Source Serum (CO-USE) during the perioperative procedure. This study was designed with a four-week follow-up period, in which the first two weeks represented a pre-treatment phase. Self-assessment, clinical evaluation, and non-invasive skin testing were used at each visit after treatments to determine the efficacy of the two products. Compared to the placebo (PBO) group, both the GEL and CO-USE groups exhibited a significantly greater reduction in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and a notable increase in stratum corneum hydration (SCH) 24 hours post treatment. Regarding facial redness, there was a significantly greater decrease in the GEL and CO-USE groups compared to the PBO group at all follow-up time points on the picosecond laser side. Moreover, the CO-USE group showed superior efficacy in alleviating skin sensitivity symptoms following the interventions. Both products were well tolerated and exhibited favourable safety profiles. Both commercially available skincare products tested in the present study were found to be clinically effective in inhibiting laser-induced skin barrier damage, and reducing skin redness and skin sensitivity.

市售美容围手术期护肤品用于无创能量装置治疗的有效性和安全性:一项单中心、随机、安慰剂对照试验
光电疗法(或无创能量装置治疗),特别是皮秒激光和强脉冲光(IPL)治疗,被广泛用于治疗各种皮肤状况,包括色素沉着、炎症和衰老迹象。然而,这些治疗也会损害皮肤屏障的完整性,使得术后修复皮肤屏障功能对于维持围手术期疗效至关重要。评估Eucerin®超敏抚慰护理凝胶(Gel)及Gel与Eucerin®超敏修复强化源血清(co-use)在围手术期联合使用的安全性和有效性。本研究设计了为期四周的随访期,其中前两周为治疗前阶段。治疗后每次就诊均采用自我评估、临床评估和非侵入性皮肤试验来确定两种产品的疗效。与安慰剂(PBO)组相比,凝胶组和CO-USE组在治疗后24小时的经皮失水(TEWL)和角质层水化(SCH)均显著降低。关于面部发红,在皮秒激光侧的所有随访时间点上,GEL组和CO-USE组与PBO组相比,显着更大的减少。此外,CO-USE组在缓解干预后皮肤敏感症状方面表现出优越的疗效。两种产品均具有良好的耐受性和良好的安全性。在本研究中测试的两种市售护肤品都被发现在临床上有效地抑制激光引起的皮肤屏障损伤,减少皮肤发红和皮肤敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dermatology
European Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dermatology is an internationally renowned journal for dermatologists and scientists involved in clinical dermatology and skin biology. Original articles on clinical dermatology, skin biology, immunology and cell biology are published, along with review articles, which offer readers a broader view of the available literature. Each issue also has an important correspondence section, which contains brief clinical and investigative reports and letters concerning articles previously published in the EJD. The policy of the EJD is to bring together a large network of specialists from all over the world through a series of editorial offices in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信