Intra-Arterial Fibrinolysis post Successful Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jiayi Zhang, Tong Meng, Zhibo Deng, Wenyi Zhong, Yuanyuan Li, Zhengzhou Yuan
{"title":"Intra-Arterial Fibrinolysis post Successful Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jiayi Zhang, Tong Meng, Zhibo Deng, Wenyi Zhong, Yuanyuan Li, Zhengzhou Yuan","doi":"10.1159/000547702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a leading cause of disability and mortality. While endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) achieves high macrovascular reperfusion rates, residual microvascular obstruction may possibly contribute to poor outcome. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial fibrinolysis (IAF) administered post successful EVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD420250642689), we systematically analyzed four randomized controlled trials (RCTs, n = 1,392) and presented one observational study (n = 81) separately comparing EVT alone versus EVT plus IAF in AIS-LVO patients achieving successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b50). Primary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-1, 0-2), while secondary outcomes evaluated mortality and hemorrhagic complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IAF mildly improved the rate of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: RR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32, p < 0.05) but did not enhance overall functional independence (mRS 0-2: RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.13, p = 0.56). No significant differences were observed in 90-day mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.16, p = 0.54) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.79-2.06, p = 0.32). Any intracranial hemorrhage incidence was higher but no significant difference (RR 1.89, 95% CI: 0.73-4.90, p = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjunctive IAF following successful EVT may enhance the likelihood of excellent functional recovery without increasing mortality or major hemorrhagic risks. However, it still has some limitations such as specific obstruction positions, IAF types, IAF dosage, etc. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to refine patient selection and optimize IAF protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains a leading cause of disability and mortality. While endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) achieves high macrovascular reperfusion rates, residual microvascular obstruction may possibly contribute to poor outcome. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial fibrinolysis (IAF) administered post successful EVT.

Methods: Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD420250642689), we systematically analyzed four randomized controlled trials (RCTs, n = 1,392) and presented one observational study (n = 81) separately comparing EVT alone versus EVT plus IAF in AIS-LVO patients achieving successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b50). Primary outcomes included 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-1, 0-2), while secondary outcomes evaluated mortality and hemorrhagic complications.

Results: IAF mildly improved the rate of excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1: RR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32, p < 0.05) but did not enhance overall functional independence (mRS 0-2: RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.13, p = 0.56). No significant differences were observed in 90-day mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.16, p = 0.54) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.28, 95% CI: 0.79-2.06, p = 0.32). Any intracranial hemorrhage incidence was higher but no significant difference (RR 1.89, 95% CI: 0.73-4.90, p = 0.19).

Conclusion: Adjunctive IAF following successful EVT may enhance the likelihood of excellent functional recovery without increasing mortality or major hemorrhagic risks. However, it still has some limitations such as specific obstruction positions, IAF types, IAF dosage, etc. Further high-quality RCTs are warranted to refine patient selection and optimize IAF protocols.

急性缺血性卒中成功血管内再灌注后动脉内纤溶:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:大血管闭塞(LVO)引起的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)仍然是致残和死亡的主要原因。虽然血管内取栓术(EVT)可以获得较高的大血管再灌注率,但残留的微血管阻塞可能导致预后不良。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了EVT成功后动脉内纤溶治疗(IAF)的有效性和安全性。方法:根据prospero注册方案(CRD420250642689),我们系统地分析了4项随机对照试验(rct, n= 1392),并提出了一项观察性研究(n=81),分别比较了单独EVT与EVT加IAF在获得成功再灌注(mTICI≥2b50)的AIS-LVO患者。主要结局包括90天功能独立性(mRS 0-1, 0-2),次要结局评估死亡率和出血性并发症。结果:IAF轻度提高了良好功能结局的发生率(mRS 0-1: RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.32)。结论:EVT成功后辅助IAF可提高良好功能恢复的可能性,而不会增加死亡率或大出血风险。但它仍有一定的局限性,如具体的梗阻部位、IAF类型、IAF剂量等。需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来完善患者选择和优化IAF方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信