Breathlessness intensity recorded in general practice is associated with shorter times to unplanned hospital admissions and longer lengths of stay: a UK cohort study.
Urvee Karsanji, Vanessa N Brunelli, Claire A Lawson, Alex Bottle, Magnus Ekström, Irina Kinchin, Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Jennifer K Quint, Michael C Steiner, Rachael A Evans, David C Currow
{"title":"Breathlessness intensity recorded in general practice is associated with shorter times to unplanned hospital admissions and longer lengths of stay: a UK cohort study.","authors":"Urvee Karsanji, Vanessa N Brunelli, Claire A Lawson, Alex Bottle, Magnus Ekström, Irina Kinchin, Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Jennifer K Quint, Michael C Steiner, Rachael A Evans, David C Currow","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Breathlessness is associated with higher rates of unplanned health service utilisation. We aimed to evaluate any associations between the severity of <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> (hereafter <i>breathlessness</i>), time between <i>breathlessness</i> recording and subsequent unplanned hospital admissions, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of adults seen in general practice (UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink) with <i>breathlessness</i> (Medical Research Council (MRC) breathlessness scale; 1-5; 5 is most intense), no pre-existing cardio-respiratory disease and a subsequent unplanned hospital admission. Data from 2007 to 2017 were used. By intensity of <i>breathlessness</i>, time to first unplanned admission and hospital length of stay were evaluated, the latter using negative binomial regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>103 917 adults had breathlessness scores recorded, of which 16 948 used MRC. 11 911 (70%) adults had a subsequent unplanned hospital admission (median (IQR) of 1538 days (846-2258)) later. More intense <i>breathlessness</i> was associated with higher age, higher body mass index and being a smoker/ex-smoker.Length of time between a first-recorded <i>breathlessness</i> score and the first unplanned hospital admission decreased significantly with higher MRC scores (MRC 1: 1167 days; MRC 5: 615 days).Negative binomial regression showed an association between higher MRC scores and an increased length of inpatient stay (p<0.001; Akaike information criterion=20 817), controlling for key demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to identify an association between recording <i>breathlessness</i> intensity and time to a person's first unplanned hospital admission and longer inpatient length of stay. Future work must focus on whether interventions can change people's health service use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Breathlessness is associated with higher rates of unplanned health service utilisation. We aimed to evaluate any associations between the severity of breathlessness limiting exertion (hereafter breathlessness), time between breathlessness recording and subsequent unplanned hospital admissions, and length of stay.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adults seen in general practice (UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink) with breathlessness (Medical Research Council (MRC) breathlessness scale; 1-5; 5 is most intense), no pre-existing cardio-respiratory disease and a subsequent unplanned hospital admission. Data from 2007 to 2017 were used. By intensity of breathlessness, time to first unplanned admission and hospital length of stay were evaluated, the latter using negative binomial regression.
Results: 103 917 adults had breathlessness scores recorded, of which 16 948 used MRC. 11 911 (70%) adults had a subsequent unplanned hospital admission (median (IQR) of 1538 days (846-2258)) later. More intense breathlessness was associated with higher age, higher body mass index and being a smoker/ex-smoker.Length of time between a first-recorded breathlessness score and the first unplanned hospital admission decreased significantly with higher MRC scores (MRC 1: 1167 days; MRC 5: 615 days).Negative binomial regression showed an association between higher MRC scores and an increased length of inpatient stay (p<0.001; Akaike information criterion=20 817), controlling for key demographic factors.
Conclusion: This is the first study to identify an association between recording breathlessness intensity and time to a person's first unplanned hospital admission and longer inpatient length of stay. Future work must focus on whether interventions can change people's health service use.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.