Ten generic competences to improve outcomes of cognitive behaviour therapy: Evidence, postulated processes, and clinical implications

IF 4.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tracey D. Wade , Glenn Waller
{"title":"Ten generic competences to improve outcomes of cognitive behaviour therapy: Evidence, postulated processes, and clinical implications","authors":"Tracey D. Wade ,&nbsp;Glenn Waller","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the 18 years since higher-order, generic competences (metacompetences) were first identified to guide the implementation of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) across anxiety and depression, much evidence has accrued supporting these generic competences and identifying others. We describe 10 generic competences that can support therapists to deliver the strongest possible outcomes in CBT across different forms of psychopathology. In each case, the robustness of the evidence-base is reviewed, the theoretical processes that link the generic competence with improved outcome for the patient are considered, and practical suggestions are offered to the therapist. The ten generic competences include: balance firmness and empathy to ensure an effective working alliance; manage therapist discomfort to use effective techniques; push for early behavioural change; focus on (and respond to) session-by-session progress in therapy; require your patient (and service) to invest in an intensive start to therapy; complex presentations should initially be met with routine therapy, changing only where guided by evidence; deliver therapy competently rather than with rigid adherence; encourage the patient to argue for behavioural change; homework completion is critical for therapy to be effective; and positive outcomes require therapists who are well-trained and well-supervised. We provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research, recognising that this list will change and grow as new evidence accumulates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 104826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 18 years since higher-order, generic competences (metacompetences) were first identified to guide the implementation of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) across anxiety and depression, much evidence has accrued supporting these generic competences and identifying others. We describe 10 generic competences that can support therapists to deliver the strongest possible outcomes in CBT across different forms of psychopathology. In each case, the robustness of the evidence-base is reviewed, the theoretical processes that link the generic competence with improved outcome for the patient are considered, and practical suggestions are offered to the therapist. The ten generic competences include: balance firmness and empathy to ensure an effective working alliance; manage therapist discomfort to use effective techniques; push for early behavioural change; focus on (and respond to) session-by-session progress in therapy; require your patient (and service) to invest in an intensive start to therapy; complex presentations should initially be met with routine therapy, changing only where guided by evidence; deliver therapy competently rather than with rigid adherence; encourage the patient to argue for behavioural change; homework completion is critical for therapy to be effective; and positive outcomes require therapists who are well-trained and well-supervised. We provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research, recognising that this list will change and grow as new evidence accumulates.
改善认知行为治疗结果的十个通用能力:证据、假设过程和临床意义
自高阶通用能力(元能力)首次被确定用于指导认知行为疗法(CBT)在焦虑和抑郁中的实施以来的18年里,已经积累了大量证据来支持这些通用能力和识别其他能力。我们描述了10种通用能力,这些能力可以支持治疗师在不同形式的精神病理学中使用CBT提供最强的可能结果。在每种情况下,证据基础的稳健性被审查,将一般能力与患者改善结果联系起来的理论过程被考虑,并向治疗师提供实用建议。十大通用能力包括:平衡坚定和同理心,以确保有效的工作联盟;管理治疗师的不适,使用有效的技术;推动早期行为改变;关注(并回应)每个疗程的治疗进展;要求你的病人(和服务)投资于密集的治疗开始;复杂的表现最初应采用常规治疗,只有在有证据指导的情况下才可以改变;有能力地提供治疗,而不是严格遵守;鼓励病人为改变行为而争论;完成家庭作业对治疗是否有效至关重要;积极的结果需要受过良好训练和监督的治疗师。我们为临床实践和未来的研究提供建议,认识到这一清单将随着新证据的积累而改变和增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信