Jinbo Li , Wei Hu , Stephanie Langer , Brendon J. Malcolm , Shane Maley , Heather Jenkins , Peter Carey
{"title":"Catch crops promote soil physical recovery after forage crop grazing","authors":"Jinbo Li , Wei Hu , Stephanie Langer , Brendon J. Malcolm , Shane Maley , Heather Jenkins , Peter Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil compaction-induced physical degradation is a threat to sustainable crop production and environmental performance. While measures have been evaluated to alleviate compaction, the impact of catch crops establishment on soil physical recovery following winter grazing remains underexplored. Six New Zealand trials over different years investigated: (1) the effects of soil compaction induced by winter forage crop grazing on soil health, and (2) the effectiveness of catch crops establishment in facilitating soil recovery. Our findings revealed that winter grazing resulted in significant soil physical degradation in the top 10 cm, evidenced by significant reduction in total porosity, macroporosity, available water content, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), and soil quality <em>S</em> index. The degree of soil degradation was higher under increased grazing intensity (fodder beet grazing compared with kale grazing) and wetter conditions. For example, in Te Pirita-2019 with kale, changes in Ks were not significant. However, in Te Pirita-2019 with fodder beet, Ks decreased significantly from 1548 mm day<sup>-</sup>¹ to 88 mm day<sup>-</sup>¹, representing a 94.3 % reduction. Compared with fallow after grazing, growing catch crops promoted soil restoration. Conventional moldboard ploughing and the recently introduced single-pass ‘spader-drill’ outperformed direct drill for soil recovery. This study highlighted the importance of catch crop establishment using conventional tillage and spade drill to mitigate soil degradation resulting from winter forage crop grazing. The spader-drill, where soil conditions allow, is preferred because it allows earlier sowing of catch crops, leading to broader benefits such as increased crop biomass and reduced nitrogen leaching.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 106778"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725003320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil compaction-induced physical degradation is a threat to sustainable crop production and environmental performance. While measures have been evaluated to alleviate compaction, the impact of catch crops establishment on soil physical recovery following winter grazing remains underexplored. Six New Zealand trials over different years investigated: (1) the effects of soil compaction induced by winter forage crop grazing on soil health, and (2) the effectiveness of catch crops establishment in facilitating soil recovery. Our findings revealed that winter grazing resulted in significant soil physical degradation in the top 10 cm, evidenced by significant reduction in total porosity, macroporosity, available water content, saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), and soil quality S index. The degree of soil degradation was higher under increased grazing intensity (fodder beet grazing compared with kale grazing) and wetter conditions. For example, in Te Pirita-2019 with kale, changes in Ks were not significant. However, in Te Pirita-2019 with fodder beet, Ks decreased significantly from 1548 mm day-¹ to 88 mm day-¹, representing a 94.3 % reduction. Compared with fallow after grazing, growing catch crops promoted soil restoration. Conventional moldboard ploughing and the recently introduced single-pass ‘spader-drill’ outperformed direct drill for soil recovery. This study highlighted the importance of catch crop establishment using conventional tillage and spade drill to mitigate soil degradation resulting from winter forage crop grazing. The spader-drill, where soil conditions allow, is preferred because it allows earlier sowing of catch crops, leading to broader benefits such as increased crop biomass and reduced nitrogen leaching.
土壤压实引起的物理退化是对可持续作物生产和环境绩效的威胁。虽然已经评估了缓解压实的措施,但冬季放牧后捕捞作物的建立对土壤物理恢复的影响仍未得到充分探讨。新西兰在不同年份进行了六项试验,研究了:(1)冬季饲草作物放牧引起的土壤压实对土壤健康的影响,(2)捕捞作物建立对促进土壤恢复的有效性。结果表明:冬季放牧导致前10位( cm)土壤物理退化显著,总孔隙度、宏观孔隙度、有效含水量、饱和导水率(Ks)和土壤质量S指数显著降低。在放牧强度增大(饲用甜菜比羽衣甘蓝)和湿润条件下,土壤退化程度更高。例如,在有羽衣甘蓝的the Pirita-2019中,Ks的变化并不显著。然而,在饲料用甜菜的Pirita-2019中,Ks从1548 mm day-¹显著下降到88 mm day-¹,减少了94.3 %。与放牧后休耕相比,种植捕捞作物促进了土壤的恢复。在土壤恢复方面,传统的犁板耕作和最近推出的单道“铲式钻机”优于直接钻机。本研究强调了利用常规耕作和铁锹钻机建立捕捞作物以减轻冬季饲草作物放牧造成的土壤退化的重要性。在土壤条件允许的情况下,播撒机是首选,因为它可以提前播种捕获作物,从而带来更广泛的好处,如增加作物生物量和减少氮淋失。
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.