Teachers’ effective teaching behaviour during team teaching: A video-based observation study

IF 2.6 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101494

Aron Decuyper , Mathea Simons , Ruben Vanderlinde

{"title":"Teachers’ effective teaching behaviour during team teaching: A video-based observation study","authors":"Aron Decuyper , Mathea Simons , Ruben Vanderlinde","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While effective teaching behaviour is crucial for students’ academic outcomes, little research has been conducted on it in team teaching. The limited research is primarily based on self-reported data from teachers, which may not fully capture actual teaching practices. This qualitative study addresses this gap by employing video-based observation data from twelve teams engaged in team teaching. The ICALT observation instrument (<span><span>Van de Grift, 2007</span></span>) is used to assess teachers’ (n = 27) effective teaching behaviour in team teaching. The findings indicate that teachers generally exhibit effective teaching behaviour during team teaching. Moreover, through horizontal and vertical analysis, the study identifies three distinct categories of teams based on their degree of effective teaching behaviour: (1) struggling, (2) complementary, and (3) excelling teams. These findings provide valuable insights into the nuances of team dynamics and their impact on teaching effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

While effective teaching behaviour is crucial for students’ academic outcomes, little research has been conducted on it in team teaching. The limited research is primarily based on self-reported data from teachers, which may not fully capture actual teaching practices. This qualitative study addresses this gap by employing video-based observation data from twelve teams engaged in team teaching. The ICALT observation instrument (Van de Grift, 2007) is used to assess teachers’ (n = 27) effective teaching behaviour in team teaching. The findings indicate that teachers generally exhibit effective teaching behaviour during team teaching. Moreover, through horizontal and vertical analysis, the study identifies three distinct categories of teams based on their degree of effective teaching behaviour: (1) struggling, (2) complementary, and (3) excelling teams. These findings provide valuable insights into the nuances of team dynamics and their impact on teaching effectiveness.

查看原文本刊更多论文

团队教学中教师有效教学行为：基于视频的观察研究

虽然有效的教学行为对学生的学业成绩至关重要，但在团队教学中对其进行的研究却很少。有限的研究主要基于教师的自我报告数据，可能无法完全捕捉实际的教学实践。本定性研究通过采用来自12个从事团队教学的团队的基于视频的观察数据来解决这一差距。采用ICALT观察仪（Van de Grift, 2007）评估教师（n = 27）在团队教学中的有效教学行为。研究结果表明，教师在团队教学中普遍表现出有效的教学行为。此外，通过横向和纵向分析，该研究根据有效教学行为的程度确定了三种不同类型的团队：(1)挣扎型团队，(2)互补型团队和(3)卓越型团队。这些发现为团队动态的细微差别及其对教学效果的影响提供了有价值的见解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studies in Educational Evaluation Multiple-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.