Ligilactobacillus salivarius and Limosilactobacillus reuteri improve growth and intestinal health in broilers via modulating gut microbiota and immune response
{"title":"Ligilactobacillus salivarius and Limosilactobacillus reuteri improve growth and intestinal health in broilers via modulating gut microbiota and immune response","authors":"Neha Chavan , Mahesh Gupta , Krushna Bibichand Bahiram , Jayant Pandurang Korde , Mukund Kadam , Atul Dhok , Sachin Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study evaluated the effects of <em>Ligilactobacillus salivarius</em> RBL50, <em>Limosilactobacillus reuteri</em> SW23, and their mixture on growth, gut health, gut microbes, immune response, and serum lipids in broiler chickens. A total of 180 one-day-old broiler chicks were divided into five groups for six weeks: control, antibiotic (BMD), <em>L. salivarius</em> RBL50, <em>L. reuteri</em> SW23, and a combination of L. <em>salivarius</em> RBL50 + <em>L. reuteri</em> SW23. The results showed that probiotics and antibiotic groups had significantly higher average body weight (ABW) and average daily gain (ADG) compared to the control. Probiotics and antibiotics also reduced feed conversion ratio (FCR) and feed intake (ADFI), with the L. <em>salivarius</em> RBL50 + <em>L. reuteri</em> SW23 group showing the best performance. Histomorphological analysis revealed increased villus height (VH) and villus height/crypt depth ratio in the jejunum of probiotic and antibiotic groups, with RBL50 showing the highest values. Broilers treated with probiotic bacteria has higher expression of <em>claudin-1</em>, <em>ZO-1</em>, reduced total viable and coliform counts, and increased <em>Lactobacillus</em> counts in the cecum. Response to intradermal injection of Phyto-haemagglutinin-P (PHA<img>P) was significantly higher in the L. <em>salivarius</em> RBL50 and L. <em>salivarius</em> RBL50 + <em>L. reuteri</em> SW23 groups, but no differences were observed in humoral immune response. Supplementation of L. <em>salivarius</em> RBL 50 and L. <em>reuteri</em> SW23 also increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the jejunum and spleen. In conclusion, <em>L. salivarius</em> RBL50 and L. <em>reuteri</em> SW23 can improve growth, gut health, and immune response, making them effective and safe alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 105837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003452882500311X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study evaluated the effects of Ligilactobacillus salivarius RBL50, Limosilactobacillus reuteri SW23, and their mixture on growth, gut health, gut microbes, immune response, and serum lipids in broiler chickens. A total of 180 one-day-old broiler chicks were divided into five groups for six weeks: control, antibiotic (BMD), L. salivarius RBL50, L. reuteri SW23, and a combination of L. salivarius RBL50 + L. reuteri SW23. The results showed that probiotics and antibiotic groups had significantly higher average body weight (ABW) and average daily gain (ADG) compared to the control. Probiotics and antibiotics also reduced feed conversion ratio (FCR) and feed intake (ADFI), with the L. salivarius RBL50 + L. reuteri SW23 group showing the best performance. Histomorphological analysis revealed increased villus height (VH) and villus height/crypt depth ratio in the jejunum of probiotic and antibiotic groups, with RBL50 showing the highest values. Broilers treated with probiotic bacteria has higher expression of claudin-1, ZO-1, reduced total viable and coliform counts, and increased Lactobacillus counts in the cecum. Response to intradermal injection of Phyto-haemagglutinin-P (PHAP) was significantly higher in the L. salivarius RBL50 and L. salivarius RBL50 + L. reuteri SW23 groups, but no differences were observed in humoral immune response. Supplementation of L. salivarius RBL 50 and L. reuteri SW23 also increased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) in the jejunum and spleen. In conclusion, L. salivarius RBL50 and L. reuteri SW23 can improve growth, gut health, and immune response, making them effective and safe alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters.
期刊介绍:
Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research.
The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally.
High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health.
Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.