An integrated framework of remote work from organizational adoption to employee outcomes: A systematic literature review

IF 10.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tahrima Ferdous, Muhammad Ali, Kevin C. Desouza, Erica French
{"title":"An integrated framework of remote work from organizational adoption to employee outcomes: A systematic literature review","authors":"Tahrima Ferdous, Muhammad Ali, Kevin C. Desouza, Erica French","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of remote work (RW) has surged dramatically since the COVID‐19 pandemic, prompting organizations to explore new work models, including fully remote and hybrid arrangements. Despite a growing body of research on RW, we know little about the conceptual and empirical connections between contextual factors driving its organizational adoption in both business‐as‐usual (BAU) and disruptive environments. Similarly, the relationship between RW's use by employees and the mechanisms by which RW influences employee outcomes has not been well studied. By incorporating an examination of the adoption stage alongside use and outcomes, researchers can develop a more nuanced understanding of RW that informs theory and practice. To this end, we propose an integrated evidence‐based RW framework grounded in the technology–organization–environment framework and job demands–resources model, based on a systematic review of 180 articles. Our findings suggest the following: (1) organizational characteristics, including technological capabilities, size, and industry type, significantly drive RW adoption in both BAU and disruptive environments; (2) crisis‐induced RW exacerbates pre‐existing demands while introducing novel stressors; these intensified and emergent demands consequently require leveraging existing resources and developing additional resources to mitigate adverse effects and promote positive employee outcomes; and (3) performance and well‐being outcomes have been focal in both pre‐ and during‐pandemic studies. This review highlights the profound impact of the pandemic on RW dynamics and offers practitioners actionable insights for navigating the evolving work landscape and future crises. A deeper understanding of the interplay between demands and resources will enable organizations to implement strategies that optimize resources, minimize demands, and ultimately enhance employee outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of remote work (RW) has surged dramatically since the COVID‐19 pandemic, prompting organizations to explore new work models, including fully remote and hybrid arrangements. Despite a growing body of research on RW, we know little about the conceptual and empirical connections between contextual factors driving its organizational adoption in both business‐as‐usual (BAU) and disruptive environments. Similarly, the relationship between RW's use by employees and the mechanisms by which RW influences employee outcomes has not been well studied. By incorporating an examination of the adoption stage alongside use and outcomes, researchers can develop a more nuanced understanding of RW that informs theory and practice. To this end, we propose an integrated evidence‐based RW framework grounded in the technology–organization–environment framework and job demands–resources model, based on a systematic review of 180 articles. Our findings suggest the following: (1) organizational characteristics, including technological capabilities, size, and industry type, significantly drive RW adoption in both BAU and disruptive environments; (2) crisis‐induced RW exacerbates pre‐existing demands while introducing novel stressors; these intensified and emergent demands consequently require leveraging existing resources and developing additional resources to mitigate adverse effects and promote positive employee outcomes; and (3) performance and well‐being outcomes have been focal in both pre‐ and during‐pandemic studies. This review highlights the profound impact of the pandemic on RW dynamics and offers practitioners actionable insights for navigating the evolving work landscape and future crises. A deeper understanding of the interplay between demands and resources will enable organizations to implement strategies that optimize resources, minimize demands, and ultimately enhance employee outcomes.
从组织采用到员工成果的远程工作集成框架:系统文献综述
自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,远程工作(RW)的采用急剧增加,促使组织探索新的工作模式,包括完全远程和混合安排。尽管对RW的研究越来越多,但我们对在“一切照旧”(BAU)和破坏性环境中推动组织采用RW的背景因素之间的概念和经验联系知之甚少。同样地,员工使用RW与RW影响员工绩效的机制之间的关系也没有得到很好的研究。通过结合对采用阶段以及使用和结果的检查,研究人员可以对RW有更细致的理解,从而为理论和实践提供信息。为此,我们在对180篇文章进行系统回顾的基础上,提出了一个基于技术-组织-环境框架和工作需求-资源模型的基于证据的综合RW框架。研究结果表明:(1)组织特征,包括技术能力、规模和行业类型,在BAU和颠覆性环境中显著推动了RW的采用;(2)危机诱导的RW在引入新的压力源的同时加剧了已有的需求;因此,这些强化的紧急需求需要利用现有资源并开发额外资源,以减轻不利影响并促进积极的员工成果;(3)在大流行之前和期间的研究中,表现和健康结果一直是重点。本次审查强调了疫情对劳动劳动动态的深刻影响,并为从业人员提供了应对不断变化的工作环境和未来危机的可行见解。更深入地了解需求和资源之间的相互作用将使组织能够实施优化资源、最小化需求并最终提高员工成果的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信