Global divergence in plant and mycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Laura G. van Galen, Justin D. Stewart, Clara Qin, Adriana Corrales, Bethan F. Manley, E. Toby Kiers, Thomas W. Crowther, Michael E. Van Nuland
{"title":"Global divergence in plant and mycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots","authors":"Laura G. van Galen, Justin D. Stewart, Clara Qin, Adriana Corrales, Bethan F. Manley, E. Toby Kiers, Thomas W. Crowther, Michael E. Van Nuland","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-60106-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental protection strategies often rely on aboveground biodiversity indicators for prioritising conservation efforts. However, substantial biodiversity exists belowground, and it remains unclear whether aboveground diversity hotspots are indicative of high soil biodiversity. Using geospatial layers of vascular plant, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and ectomycorrhizal fungi alpha diversity, we map plant–fungal diversity associations across different scales and evaluate evidence for potential correlation drivers. Plant–fungal diversity correlations are weak at the global scale but stronger at regional scales. Plant–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal correlations are generally negative in forest biomes and positive in grassland biomes, whereas plant–ectomycorrhizal fungal correlations are mostly positive or neutral. We find evidence that symbiosis strength, environmental covariation, and legacy effects all influence correlation patterns. Only 8.8% of arbuscular mycorrhizal and 1.5% of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots overlap with plant hotspots, indicating that prioritising conservation based solely on aboveground diversity may fail to capture diverse belowground regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60106-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental protection strategies often rely on aboveground biodiversity indicators for prioritising conservation efforts. However, substantial biodiversity exists belowground, and it remains unclear whether aboveground diversity hotspots are indicative of high soil biodiversity. Using geospatial layers of vascular plant, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and ectomycorrhizal fungi alpha diversity, we map plant–fungal diversity associations across different scales and evaluate evidence for potential correlation drivers. Plant–fungal diversity correlations are weak at the global scale but stronger at regional scales. Plant–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal correlations are generally negative in forest biomes and positive in grassland biomes, whereas plant–ectomycorrhizal fungal correlations are mostly positive or neutral. We find evidence that symbiosis strength, environmental covariation, and legacy effects all influence correlation patterns. Only 8.8% of arbuscular mycorrhizal and 1.5% of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity hotspots overlap with plant hotspots, indicating that prioritising conservation based solely on aboveground diversity may fail to capture diverse belowground regions.

Abstract Image

植物和菌根真菌多样性热点的全球分化
环境保护战略往往依赖于地上生物多样性指标来确定保护工作的优先次序。然而,地下存在大量的生物多样性,地上的多样性热点是否表明土壤生物多样性高尚不清楚。利用维管植物、丛枝菌根真菌和外生菌根真菌α多样性的地理空间层,我们绘制了不同尺度的植物-真菌多样性关联图,并评估了潜在相关驱动因素的证据。植物与真菌多样性的相关性在全球尺度上较弱,而在区域尺度上较强。在森林生物群落中,植物与丛枝菌根真菌的相关性一般为负,在草地生物群落中为正,而植物与外生菌根真菌的相关性大多为正或中性。我们发现了共生强度、环境共变和遗留效应都会影响相关模式的证据。只有8.8%的丛枝菌根和1.5%的外生菌根真菌多样性热点与植物热点重叠,表明仅基于地上多样性的优先保护可能无法捕获不同的地下区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信