Marginal Bone Changes at Bone-Level Implants With Narrow or Standard Diameter Abutments: 1-Year Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Antonio Liñares, Lucía Maceiras, Lourdes Nóvoa, Alejandro González, Borja Rodríguez, Pilar Batalla, Yago Leira, Juan Blanco
{"title":"Marginal Bone Changes at Bone-Level Implants With Narrow or Standard Diameter Abutments: 1-Year Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Antonio Liñares,&nbsp;Lucía Maceiras,&nbsp;Lourdes Nóvoa,&nbsp;Alejandro González,&nbsp;Borja Rodríguez,&nbsp;Pilar Batalla,&nbsp;Yago Leira,&nbsp;Juan Blanco","doi":"10.1111/clr.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate changes in the peri-implant marginal bone level at implants restored with narrow or standard-diameter abutments after 12 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material &amp; Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight partially edentulous patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The test group consisted of 14 patients restored with a 2.9 mm diameter abutment (21 implants), while the control group included 14 patients restored with a 4.1 mm diameter abutment (17 implants). The primary outcome variable was the radiographic change in the peri-implant marginal bone level at 12 months, measured as the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC). Secondary outcome variables included clinical peri-implant parameters, the papilla index, biological and mechanical complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and professional aesthetic assessment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A per-protocol analysis was conducted on the 22 patients who completed all scheduled follow-up visits. At the patient level, the change in mean radiographic bone level from definitive prosthesis placement to 12 months showed a reduction in the distance from the implant shoulder to the fBIC of 0.16 ± 0.31 mm in the test group and 0.21 ± 0.34 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for any of the secondary outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Considering the limitations of this study, no significant differences in peri-implant marginal bone levels were found between bone-level implants restored with narrow and standard diameter abutments after 12-month follow-up. Additionally, no differences were observed in clinical variables, patient-reported outcomes, or complications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 10","pages":"1335-1345"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/clr.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate changes in the peri-implant marginal bone level at implants restored with narrow or standard-diameter abutments after 12 months.

Material & Methods

Twenty-eight partially edentulous patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The test group consisted of 14 patients restored with a 2.9 mm diameter abutment (21 implants), while the control group included 14 patients restored with a 4.1 mm diameter abutment (17 implants). The primary outcome variable was the radiographic change in the peri-implant marginal bone level at 12 months, measured as the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact (fBIC). Secondary outcome variables included clinical peri-implant parameters, the papilla index, biological and mechanical complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and professional aesthetic assessment.

Results

A per-protocol analysis was conducted on the 22 patients who completed all scheduled follow-up visits. At the patient level, the change in mean radiographic bone level from definitive prosthesis placement to 12 months showed a reduction in the distance from the implant shoulder to the fBIC of 0.16 ± 0.31 mm in the test group and 0.21 ± 0.34 mm in the control group, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for any of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions

Considering the limitations of this study, no significant differences in peri-implant marginal bone levels were found between bone-level implants restored with narrow and standard diameter abutments after 12-month follow-up. Additionally, no differences were observed in clinical variables, patient-reported outcomes, or complications.

Abstract Image

狭窄或标准直径基牙的骨水平种植体的边缘骨改变:1年的随机对照试验结果
目的评价采用窄基牙或标准基牙修复种植体12个月后种植体周围边缘骨水平的变化。材料,方法将28例部分无牙患者随机分为两组。试验组14例患者修复2.9 mm基牙(21颗种植体),对照组14例患者修复4.1 mm基牙(17颗种植体)。主要结局变量是12个月时种植体周围边缘骨水平的x线片变化,以从种植体肩部到第一次骨与种植体接触(fBIC)的距离来测量。次要结果变量包括临床种植体周围参数、乳头指数、生物和机械并发症、患者报告的结果(PROs)和专业美学评估。结果对22例完成所有预定随访的患者进行了方案分析。在患者水平上,从最终假体放置到12个月的平均x线骨水平变化显示,试验组从假体肩关节到fBIC的距离减少了0.16±0.31 mm,对照组减少了0.21±0.34 mm,组间差异无统计学意义。两组间的任何次要结果均无统计学显著差异。结论考虑到本研究的局限性,经过12个月的随访,窄基牙和标准基牙修复的骨水平种植体在种植体周围边缘骨水平上没有显著差异。此外,在临床变量、患者报告的结果或并发症方面没有观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信