Bowen Zhang, Zhaojian Sun, Wujia Chen, Qiang Li, Qingfeng Yan
{"title":"Environmental Stability Diversity in Elemental Phosphorus: The Case of Black, Violet, and Fibrous Red Phosphorus","authors":"Bowen Zhang, Zhaojian Sun, Wujia Chen, Qiang Li, Qingfeng Yan","doi":"10.1002/smll.202505083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid progress of elemental phosphorus families raises a pressing question: which of the allotropes is the most environmentally stable? Clear experimental evidence remains lacking. To this end, the stability discrepancies and underlying degradation chemistry of black phosphorus (BP), violet phosphorus (VP), and fibrous red phosphorus (FP), —the three most extensively studied among phosphorus families are systematically investigated, by monitoring the spectroscopic and microscopic evolution combined with first‐principles calculations. The ambient degradation behavior of three elemental phosphorus flakes follows pseudo‐first‐order reaction kinetics. The corresponding monoexponential fitting yields rate constants <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>BP</jats:sub>, <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>VP</jats:sub>, and <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>FP</jats:sub> of 0.11, 0.18, and 0.23 day<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, respectively, quantitatively revealing that the environmental stability decreases in the order BP > VP > FP. Such stability discrepancy can also be qualitatively explained by the dissociative chemisorption energy of oxygen atoms based on first‐principles calculations. This work sheds new light on stability discrepancies and underlying degradation chemistry, paving the way for effective stabilization techniques.","PeriodicalId":228,"journal":{"name":"Small","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202505083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rapid progress of elemental phosphorus families raises a pressing question: which of the allotropes is the most environmentally stable? Clear experimental evidence remains lacking. To this end, the stability discrepancies and underlying degradation chemistry of black phosphorus (BP), violet phosphorus (VP), and fibrous red phosphorus (FP), —the three most extensively studied among phosphorus families are systematically investigated, by monitoring the spectroscopic and microscopic evolution combined with first‐principles calculations. The ambient degradation behavior of three elemental phosphorus flakes follows pseudo‐first‐order reaction kinetics. The corresponding monoexponential fitting yields rate constants kBP, kVP, and kFP of 0.11, 0.18, and 0.23 day−1, respectively, quantitatively revealing that the environmental stability decreases in the order BP > VP > FP. Such stability discrepancy can also be qualitatively explained by the dissociative chemisorption energy of oxygen atoms based on first‐principles calculations. This work sheds new light on stability discrepancies and underlying degradation chemistry, paving the way for effective stabilization techniques.
期刊介绍:
Small serves as an exceptional platform for both experimental and theoretical studies in fundamental and applied interdisciplinary research at the nano- and microscale. The journal offers a compelling mix of peer-reviewed Research Articles, Reviews, Perspectives, and Comments.
With a remarkable 2022 Journal Impact Factor of 13.3 (Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics, 2023), Small remains among the top multidisciplinary journals, covering a wide range of topics at the interface of materials science, chemistry, physics, engineering, medicine, and biology.
Small's readership includes biochemists, biologists, biomedical scientists, chemists, engineers, information technologists, materials scientists, physicists, and theoreticians alike.