Helen Salisbury: GPs are unhappy about new neighbourhood plans

The BMJ Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1136/bmj.r1595
Helen Salisbury
{"title":"Helen Salisbury: GPs are unhappy about new neighbourhood plans","authors":"Helen Salisbury","doi":"10.1136/bmj.r1595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A month since the NHS 10 year plan was published,1 many GPs are confused about what comes next. Oddly, for a plan all about neighbourhoods, it contains remarkably little about how and where general practice fits into this future NHS. While the word “genomics” appears 119 times in the document, the phrase “GP partnership” appears just twice. This has led many GPs to conclude that traditional structures—particularly our status as independent contractors to the NHS, with the autonomy that this brings—are not part of the plan. Stephen Kinnock, the government minister responsible for primary care, tried to reassure GPs at a recent BMA meeting that their contracts weren’t under threat. But he failed to convince, perhaps because that’s certainly not how the plan …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r1595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A month since the NHS 10 year plan was published,1 many GPs are confused about what comes next. Oddly, for a plan all about neighbourhoods, it contains remarkably little about how and where general practice fits into this future NHS. While the word “genomics” appears 119 times in the document, the phrase “GP partnership” appears just twice. This has led many GPs to conclude that traditional structures—particularly our status as independent contractors to the NHS, with the autonomy that this brings—are not part of the plan. Stephen Kinnock, the government minister responsible for primary care, tried to reassure GPs at a recent BMA meeting that their contracts weren’t under threat. But he failed to convince, perhaps because that’s certainly not how the plan …
海伦·索尔兹伯里:全科医生对新的社区计划感到不满
国民保健服务10年计划公布一个月后,许多全科医生对接下来会发生什么感到困惑。奇怪的是,对于一个关于社区的计划来说,它几乎没有提到如何以及在哪里进行全科医疗服务来适应未来的NHS。虽然“基因组学”一词在文件中出现了119次,但“全科医生合伙”一词只出现了两次。这导致许多全科医生得出结论,传统结构——尤其是我们作为NHS独立承包商的地位,以及由此带来的自主权——不属于计划的一部分。Stephen Kinnock,负责初级保健的政府部长,试图在最近的BMA会议上向全科医生保证他们的合同没有受到威胁。但他没能说服别人,也许是因为这肯定不是他的计划…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信