Two-piece Zirconia Implants: An Office based Retrospective Study with up to 7 and mean 3 Year Follow-Up.

IF 1.7
J Tartsch, B Chrcanovic, A Wennerberg, R Kohal, T Albrektsson
{"title":"Two-piece Zirconia Implants: An Office based Retrospective Study with up to 7 and mean 3 Year Follow-Up.","authors":"J Tartsch, B Chrcanovic, A Wennerberg, R Kohal, T Albrektsson","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-piece zirconia implants offer a metal-free alternative to titanium implants, but only limited long-term data are available. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two different, identically designed two-piece zirconia implants (NobelPearl™ and Zeramex XT) in a private dental practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between 2017 and 2024, 167 implants were placed in 106 patients and followed up to 88 months (Ø 39.1 months). In addition to the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), clinical parameters and surface properties were examined using 3D profilometry. The statistical analysis included descriptive evaluations and a survival analysis using the life table method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three implants were lost (two fractures, one failed osseointegration), corresponding to an effective survival rate of 98.2%. The mean marginal bone loss varied between -0.14 mm and -0.58 mm. The surface roughness was minimal (Sa ~0.5 µm). No risk factor showed a significant association with implant loss in the univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-piece, screw-retained zirconia implants showed a high survival rate and stable peri-implant tissue conditions over a period of up to seven years. They represent a promising metal-free alternative to titanium implants. Further prospective long-term studies are needed to validate these results and to better understand potential risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Two-piece zirconia implants offer a metal-free alternative to titanium implants, but only limited long-term data are available. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two different, identically designed two-piece zirconia implants (NobelPearl™ and Zeramex XT) in a private dental practice.

Material and methods: Between 2017 and 2024, 167 implants were placed in 106 patients and followed up to 88 months (Ø 39.1 months). In addition to the implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), clinical parameters and surface properties were examined using 3D profilometry. The statistical analysis included descriptive evaluations and a survival analysis using the life table method.

Results: Three implants were lost (two fractures, one failed osseointegration), corresponding to an effective survival rate of 98.2%. The mean marginal bone loss varied between -0.14 mm and -0.58 mm. The surface roughness was minimal (Sa ~0.5 µm). No risk factor showed a significant association with implant loss in the univariate analysis.

Conclusion: Two-piece, screw-retained zirconia implants showed a high survival rate and stable peri-implant tissue conditions over a period of up to seven years. They represent a promising metal-free alternative to titanium implants. Further prospective long-term studies are needed to validate these results and to better understand potential risk factors.

两片式氧化锆种植体:一项基于办公室的回顾性研究,随访时间长达7年,平均3年。
背景:两片式氧化锆种植体是钛种植体的一种无金属替代品,但只有有限的长期数据可用。本回顾性研究的目的是评估两种不同的,相同设计的两片式氧化锆种植体(NobelPearl™和Zeramex XT)在私人牙科诊所的临床结果。材料与方法:2017 - 2024年间,106例患者共植入167颗种植体,随访88个月(Ø 39.1个月)。除了种植体存活率外,还使用3D轮廓术检查了边缘骨丢失(MBL)、临床参数和表面特性。统计分析包括描述性评价和使用生命表法的生存分析。结果:植入物丢失3例(2例骨折,1例骨整合失败),有效生存率为98.2%。平均边缘骨损失在-0.14 mm至-0.58 mm之间。表面粗糙度最小(Sa ~0.5µm)。在单变量分析中,没有危险因素显示与种植体丢失有显著关联。结论:两片式螺钉保留氧化锆种植体在长达7年的时间内具有较高的存活率和稳定的种植周围组织状况。它们代表了一种很有前途的替代钛植入物的无金属替代品。需要进一步的前瞻性长期研究来验证这些结果并更好地了解潜在的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信