Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancies With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.2337/dc25-0115
Amy M Valent, Michaela Rickert, Christian Huerta Pagan, Lucy Ward, Emily Dunn, Monica Rincon
{"title":"Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancies With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Amy M Valent, Michaela Rickert, Christian Huerta Pagan, Lucy Ward, Emily Dunn, Monica Rincon","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM; intervention) with capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring (control) alone to achieve greater percent glucose time in range (%TIR) among pregnant individuals diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial of pregnant individuals with GDM and ≥20 weeks' gestation. Subjects were randomly assigned (2:1) to use real-time CGM plus adjunctive CBG versus CBG alone for glucose monitoring. The intervention group was instructed on the continuous use of the Dexcom G6 CGM system from enrollment to admission for delivery. The control group used CBG monitoring four times per day underwent blinded CGM approximately every 20 days throughout the study period. The primary outcome was the CGM %TIR defined as 60-140 mg/dL (3.3-7.8 mmol/L) from study enrollment until hospital admission for delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 participants were enrolled between February 2021 and June 2023 (n = 74 in intervention group; n = 37 in control group) with no statistical differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. The CGM group had significantly higher %TIR ±SD (93 ± 6 min vs. 88 ± 14 min at 60-140 mg/dL; P = 0.027). Among key secondary CGM metric outcomes, the intervention group had significantly higher daytime TIR with lower 24-h and daytime mean glucose and percent time >140 mg/dL compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated a significantly higher %TIR using real-time CGM compared with CBG glucose monitoring among pregnant people with GDM. Studies are needed to determine if achieving lower CGM glucose levels can improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"1581-1588"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM; intervention) with capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring (control) alone to achieve greater percent glucose time in range (%TIR) among pregnant individuals diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Research design and methods: This was an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled trial of pregnant individuals with GDM and ≥20 weeks' gestation. Subjects were randomly assigned (2:1) to use real-time CGM plus adjunctive CBG versus CBG alone for glucose monitoring. The intervention group was instructed on the continuous use of the Dexcom G6 CGM system from enrollment to admission for delivery. The control group used CBG monitoring four times per day underwent blinded CGM approximately every 20 days throughout the study period. The primary outcome was the CGM %TIR defined as 60-140 mg/dL (3.3-7.8 mmol/L) from study enrollment until hospital admission for delivery.

Results: A total of 111 participants were enrolled between February 2021 and June 2023 (n = 74 in intervention group; n = 37 in control group) with no statistical differences in demographic characteristics between the groups. The CGM group had significantly higher %TIR ±SD (93 ± 6 min vs. 88 ± 14 min at 60-140 mg/dL; P = 0.027). Among key secondary CGM metric outcomes, the intervention group had significantly higher daytime TIR with lower 24-h and daytime mean glucose and percent time >140 mg/dL compared with the control group.

Conclusions: We demonstrated a significantly higher %TIR using real-time CGM compared with CBG glucose monitoring among pregnant people with GDM. Studies are needed to determine if achieving lower CGM glucose levels can improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

妊娠期糖尿病患者的实时连续血糖监测:一项随机对照试验。
目的:比较实时连续血糖监测(CGM)的疗效;在诊断为妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的孕妇中,单独监测(控制)毛细血管血糖(CBG)以获得更大的血糖在范围内时间百分比(%TIR)。研究设计和方法:这是一项开放标签、单中心、随机对照试验,纳入妊娠≥20周的妊娠期GDM患者。受试者被随机分配(2:1)使用实时CGM +辅助CBG与单独CBG进行血糖监测。指导干预组从入组到分娩期间持续使用Dexcom G6 CGM系统。对照组每天进行4次CBG监测,在整个研究期间大约每20天进行一次盲法CGM。主要终点是CGM %TIR,定义为从研究入组到住院分娩的60-140 mg/dL (3.3-7.8 mmol/L)。结果:在2021年2月至2023年6月期间,共有111名参与者入组(干预组n = 74;N = 37(对照组),组间人口学特征无统计学差异。60-140 mg/dL时,CGM组TIR±SD %显著高于对照组(93±6 min vs 88±14 min);P = 0.027)。在关键的次要CGM指标指标中,与对照组相比,干预组的白天TIR显著升高,24小时和白天平均血糖和百分比时间>140 mg/dL较低。结论:我们证明,与CBG血糖监测相比,实时CGM在妊娠期GDM患者中的TIR明显更高。需要研究来确定是否达到较低的CGM血糖水平可以改善围产期和新生儿结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信