Danielle Mazza, Vera Camões-Costa, Karen Nolidin, Samantha Chakraborty, Justin Kenardy, Bianca Brijnath, Duncan Mortimer, Joanne Enticott, Michael Kidd, Lyndal J Trevena, Sharon Reid, Alex Collie
{"title":"Implementing work-related Mental-health guidelines in general PRacticE (IMPRovE): findings of a parallel cluster randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Danielle Mazza, Vera Camões-Costa, Karen Nolidin, Samantha Chakraborty, Justin Kenardy, Bianca Brijnath, Duncan Mortimer, Joanne Enticott, Michael Kidd, Lyndal J Trevena, Sharon Reid, Alex Collie","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2024-301330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health conditions arising from work are a rapidly increasing burden for individuals, employers and society, and are challenging to diagnose and treat.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention on increasing general practitioners' (GPs') adherence to the 'Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of work-related mental-health conditions in general practice' (the Guideline) and improve patient work and health and work outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pragmatic hybrid III parallel cluster randomised controlled trial involving Australian GPs and their patients. GP clinics were randomly assigned to receive the intervention (GP participation in an academic detailing session, enrolment into a virtual community of practice, and receipt of resources). Those assigned to the control group received no support related to the implementation of the Guideline. GP adherence to guideline recommendations was assessed at baseline and 9 months postbaseline, using virtual simulated patient scenarios (vignettes) describing a diverse range of patient circumstances. Patient work and health outcomes (using the 21-item Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale and 36-item short-form) were assessed using self-report surveys.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Thirty-eight intervention clusters (52 GPs) and 36 control clusters (46 GPs) contributed to the primary outcome data. Intervention clusters had significantly higher adherence scores than control clusters, by 0.98 points on a 0-9 scale (95% CI 0.38 to 1.58) with a Cohen's d of 0.67. Patients recruited from 30 intervention (n=99) and 17 control (n=55) clusters contributed to the secondary outcome data. No differences were detected for patients' work or health outcomes due to an underpowered sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GP adherence to the Guideline improved as a result of receiving the multicomponent intervention.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Purposively designed multicomponent implementation strategies to increase guideline-concordant care should be incorporated into guideline production activities and operationalised with guideline release to facilitate evidence-based care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12620001163998, November 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mental health conditions arising from work are a rapidly increasing burden for individuals, employers and society, and are challenging to diagnose and treat.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention on increasing general practitioners' (GPs') adherence to the 'Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of work-related mental-health conditions in general practice' (the Guideline) and improve patient work and health and work outcomes.
Methods: Pragmatic hybrid III parallel cluster randomised controlled trial involving Australian GPs and their patients. GP clinics were randomly assigned to receive the intervention (GP participation in an academic detailing session, enrolment into a virtual community of practice, and receipt of resources). Those assigned to the control group received no support related to the implementation of the Guideline. GP adherence to guideline recommendations was assessed at baseline and 9 months postbaseline, using virtual simulated patient scenarios (vignettes) describing a diverse range of patient circumstances. Patient work and health outcomes (using the 21-item Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale and 36-item short-form) were assessed using self-report surveys.
Findings: Thirty-eight intervention clusters (52 GPs) and 36 control clusters (46 GPs) contributed to the primary outcome data. Intervention clusters had significantly higher adherence scores than control clusters, by 0.98 points on a 0-9 scale (95% CI 0.38 to 1.58) with a Cohen's d of 0.67. Patients recruited from 30 intervention (n=99) and 17 control (n=55) clusters contributed to the secondary outcome data. No differences were detected for patients' work or health outcomes due to an underpowered sample.
Conclusions: GP adherence to the Guideline improved as a result of receiving the multicomponent intervention.
Implications: Purposively designed multicomponent implementation strategies to increase guideline-concordant care should be incorporated into guideline production activities and operationalised with guideline release to facilitate evidence-based care.
Trial registration number: ACTRN12620001163998, November 2020.
背景:工作引起的精神健康状况对个人、雇主和社会来说是一个迅速增加的负担,而且诊断和治疗具有挑战性。目的:评估多成分干预在提高全科医生(全科医生)对“全科医生工作相关心理健康状况诊断和管理临床指南”(指南)的依从性以及改善患者工作、健康和工作结果方面的有效性。方法:对澳大利亚全科医生及其患者进行实用混合平行群随机对照试验。全科医生诊所被随机分配接受干预(全科医生参与学术详细会议,注册到虚拟社区的做法,并收到资源)。那些被分配到对照组的人没有得到与指南实施有关的支持。在基线和基线后9个月评估全科医生对指南建议的依从性,使用虚拟模拟患者场景(小插曲)描述各种患者情况。患者的工作和健康结果(使用21项抑郁和焦虑压力量表和36项简短表格)通过自我报告调查进行评估。结果:38个干预组(52个全科医生)和36个对照组(46个全科医生)提供了主要结局数据。干预组的依从性得分明显高于对照组,在0-9量表上高出0.98分(95% CI 0.38至1.58),Cohen’s d为0.67。从30个干预组(n=99)和17个对照组(n=55)中招募的患者提供了次要结局数据。由于样本功率不足,未发现患者的工作或健康结果有差异。结论:接受多组分干预后,全科医生对指南的依从性得到改善。意义:有目的地设计多成分实施策略,以增加指南一致性护理,应纳入指南制定活动,并随着指南的发布而实施,以促进循证护理。试验注册号:ACTRN12620001163998, 2020年11月。