Impact of Nurse-Led Interventions on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Clinical Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1177/10547738251354998
Yang Li, Su Hu
{"title":"Impact of Nurse-Led Interventions on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yang Li, Su Hu","doi":"10.1177/10547738251354998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a major global health concern, often resulting in depression, anxiety, and disability. Effective management strategies, particularly nurse-led interventions, are essential for enhancing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in stroke patients. This study evaluates the impact of these interventions on post-stroke HRQoL outcomes. To evaluate nurse-led interventions on HRQoL in stroke patients, this systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Central, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) while applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias (ROB) assessments using the ROB-2 tool were performed independently by two investigators, with statistical analyses executed using Stata 17 software. From the initial 4,834 studies, nine studies were included for final analysis. Nine studies with 1,135 stroke patients (572 intervention, 563 control) assessed nurse-led interventions on HRQoL. Results showed a significant positive effect of nurse-led interventions (standardized mean difference (SMD): 5.26 [2.09, 8.42], I2: 99.72). Subgroup analysis revealed that Asian countries had a higher effect (SMD: 6.75 [3.45, 10.04]) compared to American and European countries (SMD: 0.08 [-0.87, 1.04]), and interventions over 10 weeks showed greater impact (SMD: 8.55 [5.56, 11.55]) compared to shorter ones (SMD: 3.59 [-0.35, 7.53]). Differences between assessment tools were also significant (<i>p</i> < .001). This meta-analysis shows that nurse-led interventions significantly improve stroke patients' HRQoL, with variations based on geography, intervention duration, and assessment tools. Further research is needed to optimize these interventions in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"304-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251354998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke is a major global health concern, often resulting in depression, anxiety, and disability. Effective management strategies, particularly nurse-led interventions, are essential for enhancing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in stroke patients. This study evaluates the impact of these interventions on post-stroke HRQoL outcomes. To evaluate nurse-led interventions on HRQoL in stroke patients, this systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Central, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) while applying strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias (ROB) assessments using the ROB-2 tool were performed independently by two investigators, with statistical analyses executed using Stata 17 software. From the initial 4,834 studies, nine studies were included for final analysis. Nine studies with 1,135 stroke patients (572 intervention, 563 control) assessed nurse-led interventions on HRQoL. Results showed a significant positive effect of nurse-led interventions (standardized mean difference (SMD): 5.26 [2.09, 8.42], I2: 99.72). Subgroup analysis revealed that Asian countries had a higher effect (SMD: 6.75 [3.45, 10.04]) compared to American and European countries (SMD: 0.08 [-0.87, 1.04]), and interventions over 10 weeks showed greater impact (SMD: 8.55 [5.56, 11.55]) compared to shorter ones (SMD: 3.59 [-0.35, 7.53]). Differences between assessment tools were also significant (p < .001). This meta-analysis shows that nurse-led interventions significantly improve stroke patients' HRQoL, with variations based on geography, intervention duration, and assessment tools. Further research is needed to optimize these interventions in clinical practice.

护士主导的干预对卒中患者健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响:系统回顾和meta分析
中风是一个主要的全球健康问题,经常导致抑郁、焦虑和残疾。有效的管理策略,特别是护士主导的干预措施,对于提高卒中患者与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)至关重要。本研究评估了这些干预措施对卒中后HRQoL结果的影响。为了评估护士主导的干预措施对脑卒中患者HRQoL的影响,本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南。在多个数据库中进行检索,包括Cochrane Central、Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和PsycINFO,以确定相关的随机对照试验(rct),同时采用严格的纳入和排除标准。数据提取和偏倚风险(ROB)评估由两名研究者独立完成,使用ROB-2工具,使用Stata 17软件进行统计分析。从最初的4834项研究中,有9项研究被纳入最终分析。9项研究纳入1135例脑卒中患者(572例干预,563例对照),评估护士主导的干预对HRQoL的影响。结果显示,护士主导干预的积极效果显著(标准化平均差异(SMD): 5.26 [2.09, 8.42], I2: 99.72)。亚组分析显示,与欧美国家(SMD: 0.08[-0.87, 1.04])相比,亚洲国家具有更高的效果(SMD: 6.75[3.45, 10.04]),超过10周的干预(SMD: 8.55[5.56, 11.55])比较短的干预(SMD: 3.59[-0.35, 7.53])显示更大的影响(SMD: 8.55[5.56, 11.55])。评估工具之间的差异也很显著(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信