Influencing factors and dynamic changes of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China: From the perspective of machine learning analysis.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1080/21645515.2025.2536898
Lei Li, Hui Jing, Yuqi Zhao, Shenghua Wu, Boyu Zhu
{"title":"Influencing factors and dynamic changes of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China: From the perspective of machine learning analysis.","authors":"Lei Li, Hui Jing, Yuqi Zhao, Shenghua Wu, Boyu Zhu","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2025.2536898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exploring the influencing factors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and summarizing countermeasures is of great significance for effectively addressing potential public health crises. Based on survey data from China, we employed a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model and conducted SHAP interpretability analysis. The results show that in the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines, the important factors include social norms, vaccine knowledge, anticipated regret, age, vaccine safety, social responsibility, education level, religious belief, vaccine effectiveness, and perceived severity. While for booster shots, the important variables include age, vaccination experience, vaccine knowledge, vaccine effectiveness, gender, perceived severity, concerns about the epidemic, social norms, anticipated regret, and sense of social responsibility. The differences in the composition and significance of these core predictive factors suggest that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is dynamically evolving. This pattern of evolution is manifested as a shift in the decision - making basis from social norms to subjective experiences, in the focus of vaccines from safety - first to effectiveness - priority, and in the decision - making mechanism from emotion - dominated to cognition - driven. The research findings inspire us that when formulating vaccination strategies, multiple factors need to be comprehensively considered. Moreover, strategies should be adjusted in a timely manner according to changes in the vaccination stages to align with the shift in public concerns and decision - making mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"21 1","pages":"2536898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12320845/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2536898","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploring the influencing factors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and summarizing countermeasures is of great significance for effectively addressing potential public health crises. Based on survey data from China, we employed a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model and conducted SHAP interpretability analysis. The results show that in the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines, the important factors include social norms, vaccine knowledge, anticipated regret, age, vaccine safety, social responsibility, education level, religious belief, vaccine effectiveness, and perceived severity. While for booster shots, the important variables include age, vaccination experience, vaccine knowledge, vaccine effectiveness, gender, perceived severity, concerns about the epidemic, social norms, anticipated regret, and sense of social responsibility. The differences in the composition and significance of these core predictive factors suggest that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is dynamically evolving. This pattern of evolution is manifested as a shift in the decision - making basis from social norms to subjective experiences, in the focus of vaccines from safety - first to effectiveness - priority, and in the decision - making mechanism from emotion - dominated to cognition - driven. The research findings inspire us that when formulating vaccination strategies, multiple factors need to be comprehensively considered. Moreover, strategies should be adjusted in a timely manner according to changes in the vaccination stages to align with the shift in public concerns and decision - making mechanisms.

中国COVID-19疫苗犹豫的影响因素及动态变化——基于机器学习分析的视角
探讨新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫的影响因素并总结对策,对有效应对潜在的公共卫生危机具有重要意义。基于中国的调查数据,我们采用梯度提升决策树(GBDT)模型进行了SHAP可解释性分析。结果表明,在COVID-19疫苗一级系列中,重要因素包括社会规范、疫苗知识、预期后悔、年龄、疫苗安全性、社会责任、文化程度、宗教信仰、疫苗有效性和感知严重程度。而对于加强注射,重要变量包括年龄、疫苗接种经验、疫苗知识、疫苗有效性、性别、感知严重程度、对流行病的担忧、社会规范、预期后悔和社会责任感。这些核心预测因素的组成和显著性差异表明,COVID-19疫苗犹豫是动态演变的。这种演变模式表现为决策依据由社会规范向主观经验转变,疫苗的重点由安全第一向有效性优先转变,决策机制由情绪主导向认知驱动转变。研究结果启发我们,在制定疫苗接种策略时,需要综合考虑多种因素。此外,应根据疫苗接种阶段的变化及时调整战略,以配合公众关注和决策机制的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
489
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信