Differentiating Emphysema From Emphysema-Dominated COPD Patients with CT Imaging Feature and Machine Learning.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Wanjin Guo, Mengqi Li, Ying Li, Xiaole Fan, Lei Wu
{"title":"Differentiating Emphysema From Emphysema-Dominated COPD Patients with CT Imaging Feature and Machine Learning.","authors":"Wanjin Guo, Mengqi Li, Ying Li, Xiaole Fan, Lei Wu","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S527914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differentiating between emphysema and emphysema-dominant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains challenging but crucial for appropriate management. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) offers potential for improved characterization, yet its optimal application in conjunction with machine learning for this differentiation is not fully established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 476 participants (99 with emphysema, 377 with emphysema-dominant COPD) aged 34-88 years. All participants underwent spirometry and chest CT scans. QCT features including emphysema index, mean lung density, airway measurements, and vessel measurements were extracted. A random forest model was developed using these QCT features to differentiate between the two groups. The model's performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Correlations between QCT parameters and pulmonary function tests were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99) in differentiating emphysema from emphysema-dominant COPD. Emphysema index and airway wall thickness were the most important features for classification. QCT-derived emphysema index showed strong negative correlation with FEV1/FVC (<i>ρ</i> = -0.54, p<0.001) in the emphysema-dominant COPD group, but no significant correlation in the emphysema group (<i>ρ</i> = 0.001, p=0.993). Mean lung density was significantly lower in the emphysema-dominant COPD group compared to the isolated emphysema group (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning analysis of QCT features can accurately differentiate emphysema from emphysema-dominant COPD. The differing relationships between QCT parameters and lung function in these two groups suggest distinct pathophysiological processes. These findings may contribute to improved diagnosis, phenotyping, and management strategies in emphysema and COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"2615-2628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S527914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differentiating between emphysema and emphysema-dominant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains challenging but crucial for appropriate management. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) offers potential for improved characterization, yet its optimal application in conjunction with machine learning for this differentiation is not fully established.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled 476 participants (99 with emphysema, 377 with emphysema-dominant COPD) aged 34-88 years. All participants underwent spirometry and chest CT scans. QCT features including emphysema index, mean lung density, airway measurements, and vessel measurements were extracted. A random forest model was developed using these QCT features to differentiate between the two groups. The model's performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Correlations between QCT parameters and pulmonary function tests were analyzed.

Results: The model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99) in differentiating emphysema from emphysema-dominant COPD. Emphysema index and airway wall thickness were the most important features for classification. QCT-derived emphysema index showed strong negative correlation with FEV1/FVC (ρ = -0.54, p<0.001) in the emphysema-dominant COPD group, but no significant correlation in the emphysema group (ρ = 0.001, p=0.993). Mean lung density was significantly lower in the emphysema-dominant COPD group compared to the isolated emphysema group (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Machine learning analysis of QCT features can accurately differentiate emphysema from emphysema-dominant COPD. The differing relationships between QCT parameters and lung function in these two groups suggest distinct pathophysiological processes. These findings may contribute to improved diagnosis, phenotyping, and management strategies in emphysema and COPD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CT影像特征与机器学习鉴别肺气肿与肺气肿为主的COPD患者。
背景:区分肺气肿和以肺气肿为主的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)仍然具有挑战性,但对适当的治疗至关重要。定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)提供了改进表征的潜力,但其与机器学习相结合的最佳应用尚未完全建立。方法:这项前瞻性研究招募了476名参与者(99名肺气肿患者,377名肺气肿为主的COPD患者),年龄34-88岁。所有参与者都进行了肺活量测定和胸部CT扫描。提取QCT特征,包括肺气肿指数、平均肺密度、气道测量和血管测量。利用这些QCT特征开发了一个随机森林模型来区分两组。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)评价模型的性能。分析QCT参数与肺功能检查的相关性。结果:该模型在肺气肿与以肺气肿为主的COPD的鉴别上,AUC-ROC为0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99)。肺气肿指数和气道壁厚度是分类最重要的特征。qct肺气肿指数与FEV1/FVC呈显著负相关(ρ = -0.54, ρ = 0.001, p=0.993)。结论:QCT特征的机器学习分析可以准确区分肺气肿与肺气肿显性COPD。在这两组中,QCT参数与肺功能之间的不同关系提示不同的病理生理过程。这些发现可能有助于改善肺气肿和COPD的诊断、表型和管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信