{"title":"Androgen Receptor and Tumor-Associated Neutrophil Expression Across Breast Cancer Subtypes: Associations With Clinicopathological Characteristics.","authors":"Minoosh Moghimi, Shahin Vadoudi, Majid Amirian, Farzane Ahmadi, Mohammad Borna Amirian, Kasra Khodadadi, Reza Mansouri, Mahsa Mahjani, Sepehr Gohari","doi":"10.1155/ijbc/8209394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study is aimed at evaluating androgen receptor (AR) and tumor-associated neutrophil (TAN) expressions in different breast cancer subtypes and their relationship with tumor differentiation, stage, and other clinicopathological markers. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study was conducted on 84 breast cancer patients at Stages I-IV. Tumor tissues were assessed using immunohistochemistry for ER, PR, HER2, AR, and Ki67, along with TAN evaluation using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Associations between AR, TAN, and other clinical variables were analyzed using chi-square, <i>t</i>-tests, and logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> AR was expressed in 70.2% of tumors and was significantly associated with ER positivity (OR = 74.31, <i>p</i> < 0.001), PR positivity (OR = 6.8, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and better differentiation (OR = 0.1 for poorly differentiated tumors, <i>p</i> = 0.035). AR positivity was highest in Luminal A/B subtypes (82%) and lowest in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (20%; OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.3). In contrast, TAN positivity was observed in 45.6% of cases and was most frequent in TNBC (67%; OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 0.9-15.3) and poorly differentiated tumors (71.4%). TANs were inversely associated with PR positivity (OR = 0.21, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and showed a significant association with vascular invasion (<i>p</i> = 0.047). No significant associations were found between AR or TAN expression and metastatic status or neural invasion. <b>Conclusion:</b> AR is a defining marker for HR-positive breast cancers and may serve as an indicator of lower tumor grade and differentiation status. TANs, however, are linked to more aggressive phenotypes, especially in TNBC, suggesting a role in driving tumor progression. This highlights the potential for AR and TAN expression patterns to refine patient stratification across breast cancer subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8209394"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12307075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijbc/8209394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study is aimed at evaluating androgen receptor (AR) and tumor-associated neutrophil (TAN) expressions in different breast cancer subtypes and their relationship with tumor differentiation, stage, and other clinicopathological markers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 84 breast cancer patients at Stages I-IV. Tumor tissues were assessed using immunohistochemistry for ER, PR, HER2, AR, and Ki67, along with TAN evaluation using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Associations between AR, TAN, and other clinical variables were analyzed using chi-square, t-tests, and logistic regression. Results: AR was expressed in 70.2% of tumors and was significantly associated with ER positivity (OR = 74.31, p < 0.001), PR positivity (OR = 6.8, p = 0.01), and better differentiation (OR = 0.1 for poorly differentiated tumors, p = 0.035). AR positivity was highest in Luminal A/B subtypes (82%) and lowest in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (20%; OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.3). In contrast, TAN positivity was observed in 45.6% of cases and was most frequent in TNBC (67%; OR = 3.7, 95% CI: 0.9-15.3) and poorly differentiated tumors (71.4%). TANs were inversely associated with PR positivity (OR = 0.21, p = 0.014) and showed a significant association with vascular invasion (p = 0.047). No significant associations were found between AR or TAN expression and metastatic status or neural invasion. Conclusion: AR is a defining marker for HR-positive breast cancers and may serve as an indicator of lower tumor grade and differentiation status. TANs, however, are linked to more aggressive phenotypes, especially in TNBC, suggesting a role in driving tumor progression. This highlights the potential for AR and TAN expression patterns to refine patient stratification across breast cancer subtypes.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for scientists, clinicians, and health care professionals working in breast cancer research and management. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to molecular pathology, genomics, genetic predisposition, screening and diagnosis, disease markers, drug sensitivity and resistance, as well as novel therapies, with a specific focus on molecular targeted agents and immune therapies.