Sustaining Community Engagement: Lessons Learned From Medical Education for Community-Academic Partnerships.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jan Kirk Carney, Thomas V Delaney
{"title":"Sustaining Community Engagement: Lessons Learned From Medical Education for Community-Academic Partnerships.","authors":"Jan Kirk Carney, Thomas V Delaney","doi":"10.1177/23821205251353070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe a novel evaluation of attitudes toward engagement with a required medical school course from the perspective of the participating community organizations. We then consider lessons learned about sustained community engagement from this longstanding community-academic partnership and potential implications for public health and research partnerships. The aim of this observational study is to assess facilitators of community engagement to improve engagement with community organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection consisted of end-of-course evaluations collected from community mentors of the student teams. Surveys were completed at the end of each course and they used a common set of questions across cohorts. Data from the Class of 2019 through the Class of 2026 were analyzed using a qualitative framework and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred mentors completed surveys across 7 years of measurement. The most frequently cited reasons for participating are interest in influencing the training of health professionals, needing additional help, and wanting a relationship with the university. Community organizations agreed or strongly agreed that the community/people served benefitted from projects and that the relationships will continue. Organizations reported a wide variety of benefits, and current and planned uses for project findings, ranging from internal program evaluation and planning to external outreach, education, and advocacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facilitators and drivers of successful partnerships are essential for project success and sustained community engagement. Our data and experience suggest that documented community benefit is essential for long-term engagement, adding to the current literature for community engagement in medical education and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251353070"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251353070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We describe a novel evaluation of attitudes toward engagement with a required medical school course from the perspective of the participating community organizations. We then consider lessons learned about sustained community engagement from this longstanding community-academic partnership and potential implications for public health and research partnerships. The aim of this observational study is to assess facilitators of community engagement to improve engagement with community organizations.

Methods: Data collection consisted of end-of-course evaluations collected from community mentors of the student teams. Surveys were completed at the end of each course and they used a common set of questions across cohorts. Data from the Class of 2019 through the Class of 2026 were analyzed using a qualitative framework and descriptive statistics.

Results: One hundred mentors completed surveys across 7 years of measurement. The most frequently cited reasons for participating are interest in influencing the training of health professionals, needing additional help, and wanting a relationship with the university. Community organizations agreed or strongly agreed that the community/people served benefitted from projects and that the relationships will continue. Organizations reported a wide variety of benefits, and current and planned uses for project findings, ranging from internal program evaluation and planning to external outreach, education, and advocacy.

Conclusions: Facilitators and drivers of successful partnerships are essential for project success and sustained community engagement. Our data and experience suggest that documented community benefit is essential for long-term engagement, adding to the current literature for community engagement in medical education and research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

维持社区参与:从医学教育中获得的社区-学术伙伴关系经验教训。
目的:我们从参与的社区组织的角度描述了一种新的对参与医学院必修课程的态度的评估。然后,我们考虑从这种长期的社区-学术伙伴关系中获得的持续社区参与的经验教训以及对公共卫生和研究伙伴关系的潜在影响。本观察性研究的目的是评估社区参与的促进因素,以改善社区组织的参与。方法:数据收集包括从学生团队的社区导师那里收集的课程结束时的评估。调查在每门课程结束时完成,他们在队列中使用了一套共同的问题。从2019级到2026级的数据使用定性框架和描述性统计进行分析。结果:100位导师在7年的测量中完成了调查。最常见的参与原因是对卫生专业人员的培训有兴趣,需要额外的帮助,以及希望与大学建立关系。社区组织同意或强烈同意所服务的社区/人民从项目中受益,并且这种关系将继续下去。组织报告了各种各样的好处,以及项目发现的当前和计划用途,范围从内部程序评估和计划到外部推广、教育和宣传。结论:成功伙伴关系的推动者和推动者对于项目成功和持续的社区参与至关重要。我们的数据和经验表明,记录在案的社区利益对于长期参与至关重要,这增加了目前关于社区参与医学教育和研究的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信