Exploring a food is medicine pilot program to improve dietary quality among rural perinatal patients.

IF 2.2 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sophia E Allen, Taralyn Bielaski, Chelsey R Canavan
{"title":"Exploring a food is medicine pilot program to improve dietary quality among rural perinatal patients.","authors":"Sophia E Allen, Taralyn Bielaski, Chelsey R Canavan","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01134-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food insecurity and other unmet social needs can contribute to adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns. Food is Medicine (FIM) approaches are promising for improving nutrition and preventing chronic disease but have not been explored fully among rural-dwelling pregnant people. Our objectives were to (1) assess the potential of FIM programs to improve perinatal dietary quality; (2) assess patient satisfaction and self-reported health status with various FIM options; and (3) identify barriers to healthy eating among rural perinatal patients experiencing food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant patients identified via a validated screener as experiencing food insecurity were referred to a community health worker (CHW), offered nutrition education, and connected to one or more FIM supports. A range of FIM programs developed through clinic-community partnerships provided tailored support to meet individual patient needs. We surveyed patients who received FIM support(s) from Dec 2023 - March 2024 regarding their satisfaction with and dietary changes related to FIM support. We collected qualitative data on challenges to healthy eating during pregnancy and opportunities for program improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In survey responses (n = 31), patients indicated high satisfaction with all FIM supports, especially more intensive options, and reported eating more vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and healthy proteins. 71% indicated a small positive change in diet quality, with home-delivered nutritionally tailored meals most likely to influence a larger positive change. The most common barriers to healthy eating included food preferences or aversions, transportation challenges, poor quality of available food, and limited time to cook or eat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified strong potential for FIM interventions during pregnancy to improve diet quality and overall health. More research is needed to evaluate the effects of FIM programs on food security and dietary quality during pregnancy and to tailor the type and duration of food support.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01134-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Food insecurity and other unmet social needs can contribute to adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns. Food is Medicine (FIM) approaches are promising for improving nutrition and preventing chronic disease but have not been explored fully among rural-dwelling pregnant people. Our objectives were to (1) assess the potential of FIM programs to improve perinatal dietary quality; (2) assess patient satisfaction and self-reported health status with various FIM options; and (3) identify barriers to healthy eating among rural perinatal patients experiencing food insecurity.

Methods: Pregnant patients identified via a validated screener as experiencing food insecurity were referred to a community health worker (CHW), offered nutrition education, and connected to one or more FIM supports. A range of FIM programs developed through clinic-community partnerships provided tailored support to meet individual patient needs. We surveyed patients who received FIM support(s) from Dec 2023 - March 2024 regarding their satisfaction with and dietary changes related to FIM support. We collected qualitative data on challenges to healthy eating during pregnancy and opportunities for program improvement.

Results: In survey responses (n = 31), patients indicated high satisfaction with all FIM supports, especially more intensive options, and reported eating more vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and healthy proteins. 71% indicated a small positive change in diet quality, with home-delivered nutritionally tailored meals most likely to influence a larger positive change. The most common barriers to healthy eating included food preferences or aversions, transportation challenges, poor quality of available food, and limited time to cook or eat.

Conclusions: We identified strong potential for FIM interventions during pregnancy to improve diet quality and overall health. More research is needed to evaluate the effects of FIM programs on food security and dietary quality during pregnancy and to tailor the type and duration of food support.

探索开展“食即药”试点,提高农村围产期患者的膳食质量。
背景:粮食不安全和其他未满足的社会需求可能导致母亲和新生儿的不良后果。食物即药物(FIM)方法有望改善营养和预防慢性疾病,但尚未在农村居住的孕妇中进行充分探索。我们的目标是:(1)评估FIM计划改善围产期饮食质量的潜力;(2)通过不同的FIM选项评估患者满意度和自我报告的健康状况;(3)确定粮食不安全的农村围产期患者健康饮食的障碍。方法:通过有效的筛选确定为经历粮食不安全的孕妇被转介给社区卫生工作者(CHW),提供营养教育,并连接到一个或多个FIM支持。通过临床-社区合作伙伴关系开发的一系列FIM项目提供了量身定制的支持,以满足患者的个人需求。我们调查了2023年12月至2024年3月期间接受FIM支持的患者,了解他们对FIM支持的满意度和饮食变化。我们收集了关于怀孕期间健康饮食的挑战和改进计划的机会的定性数据。结果:在调查回复(n = 31)中,患者对所有FIM支持都表示高度满意,特别是更密集的选择,并报告吃更多的蔬菜、水果、全谷物和健康蛋白质。71%的人表示饮食质量发生了微小的积极变化,而家庭提供的营养定制餐最有可能产生更大的积极变化。健康饮食最常见的障碍包括对食物的偏好或厌恶、交通困难、可用食物的质量差以及烹饪或食用的时间有限。结论:我们确定了FIM干预在妊娠期改善饮食质量和整体健康方面的强大潜力。需要更多的研究来评估FIM项目对怀孕期间食物安全和饮食质量的影响,并定制食物支持的类型和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信