[Effect of cone beam CT registration versus intraoral scanning registration on implant accuracy in robot-assisted surgery: a study using simulated skull models].

Q4 Medicine
Y X Wang, Y L Wang, S M Yu, Y Y Zhao, Y F Zhang, Q Yan
{"title":"[Effect of cone beam CT registration versus intraoral scanning registration on implant accuracy in robot-assisted surgery: a study using simulated skull models].","authors":"Y X Wang, Y L Wang, S M Yu, Y Y Zhao, Y F Zhang, Q Yan","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20241025-00401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the effects of using cone beam CT (CBCT) and oral scanning registration on implant positional accuracy during robot-assisted implant surgery, and to provide a basis for selecting the appropriate registration for robot-assisted implant surgical options. <b>Methods:</b> One patient with dentition defect, specifically missing teeth at positions 21 and 26 and having natural teeth adjacent mesially and distally to the edentulous area, who visited the Department of Oral Implantology, School of Hospital of Stomatology Wuhan University in 2024 were selected. Based on reconstructed imaging data, 30 identical jaw models were printed. These models were divided into a CBCT registration group and an intra-oral scanning registration group (15 models per group). An associate chief physician with extensive experience in implant surgery performed preoperative registration using the implant robot and completed the implant surgeries. Postoperative CBCT scans were used to determine the three-dimensional position of the implants. The deviations between the planned implant position and the actual position were evaluated, including deviations at the implantation point, apical point, and angular deviation. The differences between the two groups were compared. <b>Results:</b> The implantation deviation was 0.675 (0.490) mm, apical deviation was (0.680±0.272) mm, and the angular deviation was 0.566°±0.147° in the CBCT registration group, and in the intra-oral scanning registration group, implantation deviation was 0.695 (0.313) mm, apical deviation was (0.667±0.217) mm, and the angular deviation was 0.523°±0.168°. There was no statistically significant error in implant precision between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> This <i>in vitro</i> experiment found that the use of intra-oral scanning registration in robot-assisted implant surgery can achieve similar implant placement accuracy as CBCT registration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"60 8","pages":"857-862"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20241025-00401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of using cone beam CT (CBCT) and oral scanning registration on implant positional accuracy during robot-assisted implant surgery, and to provide a basis for selecting the appropriate registration for robot-assisted implant surgical options. Methods: One patient with dentition defect, specifically missing teeth at positions 21 and 26 and having natural teeth adjacent mesially and distally to the edentulous area, who visited the Department of Oral Implantology, School of Hospital of Stomatology Wuhan University in 2024 were selected. Based on reconstructed imaging data, 30 identical jaw models were printed. These models were divided into a CBCT registration group and an intra-oral scanning registration group (15 models per group). An associate chief physician with extensive experience in implant surgery performed preoperative registration using the implant robot and completed the implant surgeries. Postoperative CBCT scans were used to determine the three-dimensional position of the implants. The deviations between the planned implant position and the actual position were evaluated, including deviations at the implantation point, apical point, and angular deviation. The differences between the two groups were compared. Results: The implantation deviation was 0.675 (0.490) mm, apical deviation was (0.680±0.272) mm, and the angular deviation was 0.566°±0.147° in the CBCT registration group, and in the intra-oral scanning registration group, implantation deviation was 0.695 (0.313) mm, apical deviation was (0.667±0.217) mm, and the angular deviation was 0.523°±0.168°. There was no statistically significant error in implant precision between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: This in vitro experiment found that the use of intra-oral scanning registration in robot-assisted implant surgery can achieve similar implant placement accuracy as CBCT registration.

[锥形束CT配准与口内扫描配准对机器人辅助手术种植体准确性的影响:一项使用模拟颅骨模型的研究]。
目的:比较锥形束CT (cone beam CT, CBCT)与口腔扫描配准对机器人辅助种植手术中种植体定位精度的影响,为机器人辅助种植手术选择合适的配准方式提供依据。方法:选择2024年武汉大学口腔医院附属口腔种植科就诊的21、26位缺牙,近、远端相邻天然牙的牙列缺损患者1例。基于重建的图像数据,打印了30个相同的颌骨模型。这些模型分为CBCT注册组和口腔内扫描注册组(每组15个模型)。一位在植入手术方面经验丰富的副主任医师使用植入机器人进行了术前登记并完成了植入手术。术后CBCT扫描用于确定种植体的三维位置。评估种植体计划位置与实际位置的偏差,包括种植点偏差、根尖偏差和角度偏差。比较两组患者的差异。结果:CBCT配准组种植偏差为0.675 (0.490)mm,根尖偏差为(0.680±0.272)mm,角偏差为0.566°±0.147°;口内扫描配准组种植偏差为0.695 (0.313)mm,根尖偏差为(0.667±0.217)mm,角偏差为0.523°±0.168°。两组种植体精度比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:本体外实验发现,在机器人辅助种植手术中使用口腔内扫描配准可以达到与CBCT配准相似的种植体放置精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信