Predicting poor early voiding pattern after holep using maximum flow rate (Q-max) as an objective outcome.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Abdulmalik Addar, Adel Arezki, Tarek Benzouak, Abdullah Al Zahrani, Hend Alshamsi, Abdullah Alahmari, Ahmed Ibrahim, Abdulghani Khogeer, Mélanie Aubé-Peterkin, Serge Carrier, Fadl Hamouche
{"title":"Predicting poor early voiding pattern after holep using maximum flow rate (Q-max) as an objective outcome.","authors":"Abdulmalik Addar, Adel Arezki, Tarek Benzouak, Abdullah Al Zahrani, Hend Alshamsi, Abdullah Alahmari, Ahmed Ibrahim, Abdulghani Khogeer, Mélanie Aubé-Peterkin, Serge Carrier, Fadl Hamouche","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05817-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is recognized as a gold standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), providing durable improvements in quality of life and symptomatology. However, a subset of patients continues to experience suboptimal voiding outcomes postoperatively. This study aims to identify preoperative predictors of poor voiding patterns, as objectively measured by maximum urinary flow rate (Q-max), following HoLEP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 1121 patients who underwent HoLEP at McGill University Health Centre from January 2006 to December 2022. Inclusion required a minimum one-month follow-up with documented Q-max. Data collected included demographics, preoperative parameters (IPSS, PSA, prostate volume), operative details, and postoperative outcomes. Poor voiding was defined as a Q-max < 15 ml/sec at one month postoperatively. Bilateral stepwise regression identified candidate predictors, which were further evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had a mean age of 70.7 years (SD 8.3), mean prostate volume of 98.3 mL, and mean PSA of 6.7 ng/dL (SD 9.1). Preoperative medical therapy included alpha blockers (63.6%) and combination therapy (33%). Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age (OR = 1.01 per year; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; p = 0.017), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62; p = 0.028), and preoperative combination BPH therapy (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34; p = 0.023) were independently associated with poor postoperative Q-max, whereas increased enucleated tissue weight was protective (OR = 0.998; 95% CI, 0.996-0.999; p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and combination BPH therapy independently predict suboptimal voiding after HoLEP, highlighting the need for tailored preoperative evaluation and management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05817-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is recognized as a gold standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), providing durable improvements in quality of life and symptomatology. However, a subset of patients continues to experience suboptimal voiding outcomes postoperatively. This study aims to identify preoperative predictors of poor voiding patterns, as objectively measured by maximum urinary flow rate (Q-max), following HoLEP.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1121 patients who underwent HoLEP at McGill University Health Centre from January 2006 to December 2022. Inclusion required a minimum one-month follow-up with documented Q-max. Data collected included demographics, preoperative parameters (IPSS, PSA, prostate volume), operative details, and postoperative outcomes. Poor voiding was defined as a Q-max < 15 ml/sec at one month postoperatively. Bilateral stepwise regression identified candidate predictors, which were further evaluated using logistic regression.

Results: The cohort had a mean age of 70.7 years (SD 8.3), mean prostate volume of 98.3 mL, and mean PSA of 6.7 ng/dL (SD 9.1). Preoperative medical therapy included alpha blockers (63.6%) and combination therapy (33%). Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced age (OR = 1.01 per year; 95% CI, 1.00-1.01; p = 0.017), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62; p = 0.028), and preoperative combination BPH therapy (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34; p = 0.023) were independently associated with poor postoperative Q-max, whereas increased enucleated tissue weight was protective (OR = 0.998; 95% CI, 0.996-0.999; p = 0.005).

Conclusions: Advanced age, diabetes mellitus, and combination BPH therapy independently predict suboptimal voiding after HoLEP, highlighting the need for tailored preoperative evaluation and management strategies.

以最大排尿率(Q-max)作为客观指标预测术后早期排尿不良。
目的:钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)被认为是治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的金标准,可持久改善患者的生活质量和症状。然而,一小部分患者术后排尿效果仍不理想。本研究旨在确定HoLEP后最大尿流率(Q-max)客观测量的排尿模式不佳的术前预测因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了2006年1月至2022年12月在麦吉尔大学健康中心接受HoLEP治疗的1121例患者。纳入需要至少一个月的随访,并记录Q-max。收集的数据包括人口统计学、术前参数(IPSS、PSA、前列腺体积)、手术细节和术后结果。结果:该队列的平均年龄为70.7岁(SD 8.3),平均前列腺体积为98.3 mL,平均PSA为6.7 ng/dL (SD 9.1)。术前药物治疗包括受体阻滞剂(63.6%)和联合治疗(33%)。多因素分析显示高龄患者(OR = 1.01 /年;95% ci, 1.00-1.01;p = 0.017),糖尿病(OR = 1.29;95% ci, 1.03-1.62;p = 0.028),术前联合BPH治疗(OR = 1.17;95% ci, 1.02-1.34;p = 0.023)与术后Q-max不良独立相关,而去核组织重量增加具有保护作用(OR = 0.998;95% ci, 0.996-0.999;p = 0.005)。结论:高龄、糖尿病和BPH联合治疗独立预测HoLEP术后排尿不佳,强调术前评估和管理策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信