Conflicting Motor Plans and Sensory Attenuation: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials for Sounds Generated by Pro- and Antisaccades.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Alexander Seidel, Christian Bellebaum
{"title":"Conflicting Motor Plans and Sensory Attenuation: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials for Sounds Generated by Pro- and Antisaccades.","authors":"Alexander Seidel, Christian Bellebaum","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reduction of neural responses to self- versus externally generated stimuli has been ascribed to predictions based on an efference copy of motor commands. However, general predictive mechanisms not specific to movements may also play a role. For antisaccades, that is, eye movements in the opposite direction of a target stimulus, an automated prosaccade has to be suppressed, which may lead to conflicting efference copy signals, as an efference copy is likely created also for the prosaccade. If efference copies for the suppressed and executed saccade are in conflict with each other, prediction mechanisms based on their information are potentially disturbed, which may affect the processing of saccade-generated stimuli. We compared the N1 and P2 components for pro- and antisaccade-generated sounds with those for visually cued external sounds and found differing temporal dynamics of both components during the course of the experiment, depending on the saccade type. The N1 amplitude for pro- but not antisaccade-generated sounds changed over the course of the experiment, with evidence of an attenuation relative to visually cued sounds at the end. The P2 for prosaccade-generated sounds decreased already earlier than that for antisaccade-generated sounds, which only decreased toward the end of the experiment. These findings suggest that both early (N1) and late (P2) processing of saccade-generated sounds is affected by conflicting efference copies, with the early effect probably reflecting forward model predictions and the later effect indicating agency perception based on these predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 8","pages":"e70114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reduction of neural responses to self- versus externally generated stimuli has been ascribed to predictions based on an efference copy of motor commands. However, general predictive mechanisms not specific to movements may also play a role. For antisaccades, that is, eye movements in the opposite direction of a target stimulus, an automated prosaccade has to be suppressed, which may lead to conflicting efference copy signals, as an efference copy is likely created also for the prosaccade. If efference copies for the suppressed and executed saccade are in conflict with each other, prediction mechanisms based on their information are potentially disturbed, which may affect the processing of saccade-generated stimuli. We compared the N1 and P2 components for pro- and antisaccade-generated sounds with those for visually cued external sounds and found differing temporal dynamics of both components during the course of the experiment, depending on the saccade type. The N1 amplitude for pro- but not antisaccade-generated sounds changed over the course of the experiment, with evidence of an attenuation relative to visually cued sounds at the end. The P2 for prosaccade-generated sounds decreased already earlier than that for antisaccade-generated sounds, which only decreased toward the end of the experiment. These findings suggest that both early (N1) and late (P2) processing of saccade-generated sounds is affected by conflicting efference copies, with the early effect probably reflecting forward model predictions and the later effect indicating agency perception based on these predictions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

冲突的运动计划和感觉衰减:来自前扫视和反扫视产生的声音的事件相关电位的证据。
相对于外部刺激,神经反应的减少被认为是基于运动命令的感知拷贝的预测。然而,非特定于运动的一般预测机制也可能起作用。对于反扫视,即眼球运动方向与目标刺激方向相反的情况,必须抑制自动的前驱活动,这可能导致相互冲突的参考复制信号,因为前驱活动也可能产生参考复制。如果被抑制的和被执行的眼跳的拷贝相互冲突,基于它们的信息的预测机制可能会受到干扰,这可能会影响对眼跳产生的刺激的处理。我们比较了前扫视和反扫视产生的声音的N1和P2分量与视觉提示的外部声音的N1和P2分量,发现在实验过程中,根据扫视类型,这两个分量的时间动态是不同的。在实验过程中,由眼跳产生的声音的N1振幅发生了变化,有证据表明,在实验结束时,相对于视觉提示的声音,N1振幅有所衰减。亲眼压产生的声音的P2下降早于反眼压产生的声音,只是在实验结束时才下降。这些发现表明,眼压产生的声音的早期(N1)和后期(P2)加工都受到相互冲突的参考拷贝的影响,早期影响可能反映了前向模型预测,而后期影响表明基于这些预测的代理感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信