Shared Decision-Making in Medications for Elderly Patients with Multi-Morbidities: A Phenomenological Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S508770
Yu-Dan Liu, Hua Zhao, Cai-Yun Zhang, Yu-Juan Zheng, Jia-Ning Hou, Jia-Le Yang, Xing-Yu Liu
{"title":"Shared Decision-Making in Medications for Elderly Patients with Multi-Morbidities: A Phenomenological Study.","authors":"Yu-Dan Liu, Hua Zhao, Cai-Yun Zhang, Yu-Juan Zheng, Jia-Ning Hou, Jia-Le Yang, Xing-Yu Liu","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S508770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the willingness, needs, and factors influencing participation in medication decision-making among elderly patients with multi-morbidities, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phenomenological research method was used to conduct semi-structured interviews with elderly patients with multi-morbidities, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The purposive sampling method was used to select geriatric patients with multi-morbidities, their caregivers, and healthcare workers from March to July 2024 in the Geriatrics, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Respiratory, and Nephrology Departments of a tertiary hospital in Shanxi Province as the study subjects. The Colaizzi 7-step analysis method was used to analyze, summarize, and refine themes from the interview data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve elderly patients with multi-morbidities, nine caregivers, and seven healthcare professionals were interviewed. Three themes and nine sub-themes were identified, as follows: (1) willingness to participate in decision-making (large differences in willingness and discrepancies between willingness and reality); (2) the current status of multi-morbidity management (lack of guidelines, healthcare systems and decision-making support systems); and (3) factors influencing participation in decision-making (bias in the power structure, lack of information exchange, insufficient knowledge and awareness of shared decision-making by healthcare workers, differences in patients' self-management initiative and medication-focused motivations).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elderly patients with multi-morbidities were affected by multiple impediments to participation in medication decision-making. Healthcare professionals should continue to improve their shared decision-making awareness and ability, provide patients with targeted decision-making needs, solve decision-making problems, and promote the implementation of shared decision-making in elderly patients with multi-morbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2201-2212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S508770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the willingness, needs, and factors influencing participation in medication decision-making among elderly patients with multi-morbidities, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.

Methods: A phenomenological research method was used to conduct semi-structured interviews with elderly patients with multi-morbidities, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The purposive sampling method was used to select geriatric patients with multi-morbidities, their caregivers, and healthcare workers from March to July 2024 in the Geriatrics, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Respiratory, and Nephrology Departments of a tertiary hospital in Shanxi Province as the study subjects. The Colaizzi 7-step analysis method was used to analyze, summarize, and refine themes from the interview data.

Results: Twelve elderly patients with multi-morbidities, nine caregivers, and seven healthcare professionals were interviewed. Three themes and nine sub-themes were identified, as follows: (1) willingness to participate in decision-making (large differences in willingness and discrepancies between willingness and reality); (2) the current status of multi-morbidity management (lack of guidelines, healthcare systems and decision-making support systems); and (3) factors influencing participation in decision-making (bias in the power structure, lack of information exchange, insufficient knowledge and awareness of shared decision-making by healthcare workers, differences in patients' self-management initiative and medication-focused motivations).

Conclusion: Elderly patients with multi-morbidities were affected by multiple impediments to participation in medication decision-making. Healthcare professionals should continue to improve their shared decision-making awareness and ability, provide patients with targeted decision-making needs, solve decision-making problems, and promote the implementation of shared decision-making in elderly patients with multi-morbidities.

多病老年患者共同用药决策:现象学研究
目的:探讨老年多病患者、护理人员和医护人员参与用药决策的意愿、需求及影响因素。方法:采用现象学研究方法,对多种疾病的老年患者、护理人员和医护人员进行半结构化访谈。采用目的抽样方法,选取山西省某三级医院老年科、心脏科、内分泌科、呼吸科、肾科2024年3月至7月的多病老年患者及其护理人员和医护人员作为研究对象。采用Colaizzi七步分析法对访谈数据进行分析、总结、提炼主题。结果:对12例多病老年患者、9名护理人员和7名医护人员进行了访谈。结果表明:(1)参与决策的意愿(意愿差异大,意愿与现实存在差异);(2)多发病管理现状(缺乏指南、医疗体系和决策支持系统);(3)影响决策参与的因素(权力结构偏见、信息交流不足、医护人员对共同决策的认识和意识不足、患者自我管理主动性和以药物为中心的动机差异)。结论:多种疾病的老年患者参与用药决策存在多种障碍。医护人员应不断提高共享决策的意识和能力,为患者提供有针对性的决策需求,解决决策问题,推动共享决策在老年多病患者中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信