Restless Legs Syndrome Patients with Early Onset Disease or a Relevant Family History Associated with Pramipexole Ineffectiveness but Not Pregabalin.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nature and Science of Sleep Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NSS.S532626
Miaofa Ying, Tiantian Wang, Ting Zhang, Ziyang Zhai, Lisan Zhang
{"title":"Restless Legs Syndrome Patients with Early Onset Disease or a Relevant Family History Associated with Pramipexole Ineffectiveness but Not Pregabalin.","authors":"Miaofa Ying, Tiantian Wang, Ting Zhang, Ziyang Zhai, Lisan Zhang","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S532626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a complex condition characterized by significant heterogeneity. Factors that affect medication efficacy remain unclear; different RLS subtypes may respond differently to various drugs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with the ineffectiveness of pramipexole and pregabalin in patients with various subtypes of RLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective nested case-control study enrolled 257 RLS patients prescribed pramipexole or pregabalin between March 2019 and April 2024 at the sleep center of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. All patients completed a semi-structured questionnaire, underwent polysomnography and laboratory evaluations, and participated in a telephone survey. To represent iron-storage status, one principal component score that included five indicators of peripheral iron metabolism was extracted by principal component analysis. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, with scores of 1-3 indicating effective treatment and higher scores reflecting ineffective treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the risk factors (or RLS subtypes) of medication ineffectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of patients treated with pramipexole, 42.7% (70/164) reported poor outcomes. Early onset RLS (OR = 5.076; 95% CI, 1.836-14.033) and relevant family history (OR = 4.537; 95% CI, 1.556-13.437) increased pramipexole ineffectiveness risk. Among pregabalin users, 34.4% (32/93) reported ineffectiveness, which was associated with hemoglobin levels (OR = 1.039; 95% CI, 1.001-1.079).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that RLS patients with familial or early-onset characteristics may represent a distinct subtype that responds preferentially to α2δ ligands over dopamine agonists, supporting personalized treatment approaches based on clinical phenotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"17 ","pages":"1695-1708"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S532626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a complex condition characterized by significant heterogeneity. Factors that affect medication efficacy remain unclear; different RLS subtypes may respond differently to various drugs.

Objective: To identify factors associated with the ineffectiveness of pramipexole and pregabalin in patients with various subtypes of RLS.

Methods: This retrospective nested case-control study enrolled 257 RLS patients prescribed pramipexole or pregabalin between March 2019 and April 2024 at the sleep center of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. All patients completed a semi-structured questionnaire, underwent polysomnography and laboratory evaluations, and participated in a telephone survey. To represent iron-storage status, one principal component score that included five indicators of peripheral iron metabolism was extracted by principal component analysis. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, with scores of 1-3 indicating effective treatment and higher scores reflecting ineffective treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the risk factors (or RLS subtypes) of medication ineffectiveness.

Results: Of patients treated with pramipexole, 42.7% (70/164) reported poor outcomes. Early onset RLS (OR = 5.076; 95% CI, 1.836-14.033) and relevant family history (OR = 4.537; 95% CI, 1.556-13.437) increased pramipexole ineffectiveness risk. Among pregabalin users, 34.4% (32/93) reported ineffectiveness, which was associated with hemoglobin levels (OR = 1.039; 95% CI, 1.001-1.079).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that RLS patients with familial or early-onset characteristics may represent a distinct subtype that responds preferentially to α2δ ligands over dopamine agonists, supporting personalized treatment approaches based on clinical phenotyping.

不宁腿综合征患者早发性疾病或相关家族史与普拉克索无效而非普瑞巴林相关
背景:不宁腿综合征(RLS)是一种复杂的疾病,具有显著的异质性。影响药物疗效的因素尚不清楚;不同的RLS亚型对不同药物的反应可能不同。目的:探讨普拉克索与普瑞巴林治疗不同亚型RLS无效的相关因素。方法:采用回顾性巢式病例对照研究,于2019年3月至2024年4月在邵逸夫医院睡眠中心接受普拉克索或普瑞巴林治疗的257例RLS患者。所有患者都完成了一份半结构化问卷,接受了多导睡眠描记仪和实验室评估,并参加了电话调查。通过主成分分析,提取一个主成分评分,包括5个外周铁代谢指标,以表征铁储存状态。采用临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)量表评估治疗效果,得分1-3表示治疗有效,得分越高表示治疗无效。采用多因素logistic回归评估药物无效的危险因素(或RLS亚型)。结果:在接受普拉克索治疗的患者中,42.7%(70/164)报告了不良预后。早发性RLS (OR = 5.076;95% CI, 1.836-14.033)和相关家族史(OR = 4.537;95% CI, 1.556-13.437)增加了普拉克索无效的风险。在普瑞巴林使用者中,34.4%(32/93)报告无效,这与血红蛋白水平有关(OR = 1.039;95% ci, 1.001-1.079)。结论:这些研究结果表明,具有家族性或早发特征的RLS患者可能代表着一种独特的亚型,其对α2δ配体的反应优于多巴胺激动剂,支持基于临床表型的个性化治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature and Science of Sleep
Nature and Science of Sleep Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
245
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep. Specific topics covered in the journal include: The functions of sleep in humans and other animals Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep The genetics of sleep and sleep differences The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness Sleep changes with development and with age Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause) The science and nature of dreams Sleep disorders Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health) The microbiome and sleep Chronotherapy Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信