Comparing Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam When Administered With a Needle-Free Injection Device Versus Needle-And-Syringe in Piglets.

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Minh Man Pham, Terri L O'Sullivan, Maria Del Rocio Amezcua, Saad Enouri, Yu Gu, Zvonimir Poljak, Jennifer M Reinhart, Ron Johnson
{"title":"Comparing Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam When Administered With a Needle-Free Injection Device Versus Needle-And-Syringe in Piglets.","authors":"Minh Man Pham, Terri L O'Sullivan, Maria Del Rocio Amezcua, Saad Enouri, Yu Gu, Zvonimir Poljak, Jennifer M Reinhart, Ron Johnson","doi":"10.1111/jvp.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meloxicam is a common analgesic for castration in pigs. While needle-free technology is effective for swine vaccination, its implementation for administering meloxicam has not been fully explored. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meloxicam administered via a commercial needle-free injection device (NFID) and intramuscularly via needle-and-syringe (NS) in nursing piglets. Twenty-six nursing piglets were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups receiving the same approved label dosage of 0.4 mg/kg of meloxicam. Plasma meloxicam concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and PK profiles were measured using non-compartmental analysis. The results indicated C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-last</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>, AUMC<sub>0-last</sub>, AUMC<sub>0-∞</sub>, and MRT in the NFID group were all significantly lower compared with those of the NS group (p < 0.05). No differences in T<sub>max</sub>, T<sub>1/2</sub>, and λ<sub>z</sub> were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The study concluded that further research is needed to determine the optimal NFID setting and the clinical efficacy when using NFID for injecting meloxicam in piglets.</p>","PeriodicalId":17596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meloxicam is a common analgesic for castration in pigs. While needle-free technology is effective for swine vaccination, its implementation for administering meloxicam has not been fully explored. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meloxicam administered via a commercial needle-free injection device (NFID) and intramuscularly via needle-and-syringe (NS) in nursing piglets. Twenty-six nursing piglets were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups receiving the same approved label dosage of 0.4 mg/kg of meloxicam. Plasma meloxicam concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and PK profiles were measured using non-compartmental analysis. The results indicated Cmax, AUC0-last, AUC0-∞, AUMC0-last, AUMC0-∞, and MRT in the NFID group were all significantly lower compared with those of the NS group (p < 0.05). No differences in Tmax, T1/2, and λz were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The study concluded that further research is needed to determine the optimal NFID setting and the clinical efficacy when using NFID for injecting meloxicam in piglets.

美洛昔康在仔猪体内无针注射装置与针筒注射装置的药代动力学比较。
美洛昔康是猪去势常用的镇痛药。虽然无针技术对猪疫苗接种是有效的,但其在施用美洛昔康方面的实施尚未得到充分探索。本研究的目的是比较美洛昔康通过商业无针注射装置(NFID)和通过针注射器(NS)给药在哺乳仔猪体内的药代动力学(PK)。将26头哺乳仔猪随机分为两组,每组给予相同的批准标签剂量0.4 mg/kg的美洛昔康。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定血浆美洛昔康浓度,采用非区室分析测定PK谱。结果显示,NFID组的Cmax、AUC0-last、AUC0-∞、AUMC0-last、AUMC0-∞、MRT均显著低于NS组(两组间p max、T1/2、λz差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。本研究认为,在仔猪中使用NFID注射美洛昔康时,NFID的最佳设置和临床疗效有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JVPT) is an international journal devoted to the publication of scientific papers in the basic and clinical aspects of veterinary pharmacology and toxicology, whether the study is in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo or in silico. The Journal is a forum for recent scientific information and developments in the discipline of veterinary pharmacology, including toxicology and therapeutics. Studies that are entirely in vitro will not be considered within the scope of JVPT unless the study has direct relevance to the use of the drug (including toxicants and feed additives) in veterinary species, or that it can be clearly demonstrated that a similar outcome would be expected in vivo. These studies should consider approved or widely used veterinary drugs and/or drugs with broad applicability to veterinary species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信