{"title":"Association between bullous pemphigoid and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies","authors":"XiaoLi Yang, XiaoRan Tao, PanLing Wei, Chen Xu, JinPing Gao, FuSheng Zhou, ZaiXing Wang","doi":"10.1038/s41371-025-01056-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have indicated a relationship between bullous pemphigoid (BP) and hypertension, but the findings remain controversial. To examine this association, we conducted a systematic review using studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, applying a random-effects model while performing subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed by country, data source, and sample size. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024573911). The analysis included 20 studies, primarily consisting of case-control studies from Europe and Asia, encompassing 72,981,822 participants, of whom 29,199 had BP. The mean ages of the BP group and the non-BP group were 74.62 and 74.25 years, respectively. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between BP and hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.20). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in database studies (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.17–1.31) and in studies with over 1000 BP cases (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23–1.37). No significant association was observed in studies conducted in Asia (OR = 1.05) or Europe (OR = 1.07). However, a significant relationship was found in studies from the United States (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12–1.48). This study found a significant correlation between BP and hypertension, particularly in the United States. However, as most included studies were observational in nature, causality cannot be inferred. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and causal relationship between BP and hypertension.","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":"39 9","pages":"666-674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-025-01056-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Studies have indicated a relationship between bullous pemphigoid (BP) and hypertension, but the findings remain controversial. To examine this association, we conducted a systematic review using studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, applying a random-effects model while performing subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed by country, data source, and sample size. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024573911). The analysis included 20 studies, primarily consisting of case-control studies from Europe and Asia, encompassing 72,981,822 participants, of whom 29,199 had BP. The mean ages of the BP group and the non-BP group were 74.62 and 74.25 years, respectively. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a significant association between BP and hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.20). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations in database studies (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.17–1.31) and in studies with over 1000 BP cases (OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23–1.37). No significant association was observed in studies conducted in Asia (OR = 1.05) or Europe (OR = 1.07). However, a significant relationship was found in studies from the United States (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12–1.48). This study found a significant correlation between BP and hypertension, particularly in the United States. However, as most included studies were observational in nature, causality cannot be inferred. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and causal relationship between BP and hypertension.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension.
The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.