Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy Using a Flexible and Navigable Ureteral Access Sheath Are Equally Safe and Effective whether Done in a Sitting or a Standing Position: A Multicenter Study by European Association of Urology-Endourology and the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath Collaborative Group.
Khi Yung Fong, Bhaskar Somani, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Daniele Castellani, Chin Tiong Heng, Jia-Lun Kwok, Chu-Ann Chai, Wissam Kamal, Chinnakhet Ketsuwan, Kremena Petkova, Boyke Soebhali, Marek Zawadzki, Saeed Bin Hamri, Mohamed Elshazly, Yi Quan Tan, Pablo Nicolas Contreras, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos, Steffi Yuen, Olivier Traxer, Vineet Gauhar
{"title":"Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy Using a Flexible and Navigable Ureteral Access Sheath Are Equally Safe and Effective whether Done in a Sitting or a Standing Position: A Multicenter Study by European Association of Urology-Endourology and the Flexible and Navigable Suction Access Sheath Collaborative Group.","authors":"Khi Yung Fong, Bhaskar Somani, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Daniele Castellani, Chin Tiong Heng, Jia-Lun Kwok, Chu-Ann Chai, Wissam Kamal, Chinnakhet Ketsuwan, Kremena Petkova, Boyke Soebhali, Marek Zawadzki, Saeed Bin Hamri, Mohamed Elshazly, Yi Quan Tan, Pablo Nicolas Contreras, Lazaros Tzelves, Andreas Skolarikos, Steffi Yuen, Olivier Traxer, Vineet Gauhar","doi":"10.1177/08927790251364288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) using the flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) is a novel technique for treatment of kidney stones. We aimed to compare outcomes of FURS with FANS in the sitting vs standing position. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We analyzed adult patients from 21 centers who underwent FURS with FANS, divided according to whether the surgeon operated in a sitting or standing position. Baseline demographics, operative parameters, and 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify potential predictive factors for zero residual fragments (ZRF). <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 457 patients in the sitting group and 247 patients in the standing group. In the sitting group, more patients had the surgical procedure under general anesthesia (<i>p</i> = 0.022). Disposable scopes were preferred in the standing group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Median lasing and ureteroscopy time were significantly shorter in the siting group, but there was no difference in total surgical time (median 45 vs 46 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.102). A larger but nonsignificant percentage of grade 1 access sheath insertion injuries were reported in the standing position. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.93, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and operative time (OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.002) but not surgeon position (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75-1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.82) were significant predictors of ZRF. Procedural safety was not compromised significantly. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> FURS with FANS is equally safe and effective in the sitting and standing positions. This study provides the impetus to improve FURS ergonomics, especially with the move toward its use in complex and large stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"841-848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251364288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) using the flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) is a novel technique for treatment of kidney stones. We aimed to compare outcomes of FURS with FANS in the sitting vs standing position. Patients and Methods: We analyzed adult patients from 21 centers who underwent FURS with FANS, divided according to whether the surgeon operated in a sitting or standing position. Baseline demographics, operative parameters, and 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify potential predictive factors for zero residual fragments (ZRF). Results: There were 457 patients in the sitting group and 247 patients in the standing group. In the sitting group, more patients had the surgical procedure under general anesthesia (p = 0.022). Disposable scopes were preferred in the standing group (p < 0.001). Median lasing and ureteroscopy time were significantly shorter in the siting group, but there was no difference in total surgical time (median 45 vs 46 minutes, p = 0.102). A larger but nonsignificant percentage of grade 1 access sheath insertion injuries were reported in the standing position. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that stone volume (odds ratio [OR]: 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.93, p = 0.003) and operative time (OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p = 0.002) but not surgeon position (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75-1.44, p = 0.82) were significant predictors of ZRF. Procedural safety was not compromised significantly. Conclusions: FURS with FANS is equally safe and effective in the sitting and standing positions. This study provides the impetus to improve FURS ergonomics, especially with the move toward its use in complex and large stones.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes.
The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation.
Journal of Endourology coverage includes:
The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions
Pioneering research articles
Controversial cases in endourology
Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos
Reviews and epochs in endourology
Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.