Clinical Use of Lung Ultrasound by Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians: A Swiss National Survey.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Norah Villars, Thomas Berlet, Luca Cioccari
{"title":"Clinical Use of Lung Ultrasound by Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians: A Swiss National Survey.","authors":"Norah Villars, Thomas Berlet, Luca Cioccari","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). However, little is known about its use, training, indications, and implementation barriers. Therefore, we performed a survey to evaluate the current practice of LUS among ED and ICU physicians with varying experience levels across regions in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 27-question online survey was disseminated across 108 EDs and 75 ICUs using snowball sampling via department heads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all 18 participants from 183 invited departments (49.0% ED physicians, 42.3% ICU physicians, 8.7% from other specialties), 190 (95.5%) use ultrasound and 164 (82.8%) use LUS in their clinical practice. Predominantly, LUS is utilized for evaluating dyspnea (95.9%), shock (76.2%), and hypoxemia (73.5%). ICU physicians used LUS more for invasive procedures, while less experienced physicians had lower certification rates. Standardized protocols for LUS examination or documentation were reported by only 22.5% and 38.9% of responders, respectively. The main barriers identified were time constraints, lack of training opportunities, and underestimation of LUSs diagnostic value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LUS is widely adopted and considered highly relevant by ED and ICU physicians. However, disparities in usage and proficiency were observed between ICU and non-ICU physicians, as well as between more and less experienced practitioners. Addressing the identified training gaps and promoting standardized protocol adoption are imperative for optimizing LUSs integration into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). However, little is known about its use, training, indications, and implementation barriers. Therefore, we performed a survey to evaluate the current practice of LUS among ED and ICU physicians with varying experience levels across regions in Switzerland.

Methods: A 27-question online survey was disseminated across 108 EDs and 75 ICUs using snowball sampling via department heads.

Results: Of all 18 participants from 183 invited departments (49.0% ED physicians, 42.3% ICU physicians, 8.7% from other specialties), 190 (95.5%) use ultrasound and 164 (82.8%) use LUS in their clinical practice. Predominantly, LUS is utilized for evaluating dyspnea (95.9%), shock (76.2%), and hypoxemia (73.5%). ICU physicians used LUS more for invasive procedures, while less experienced physicians had lower certification rates. Standardized protocols for LUS examination or documentation were reported by only 22.5% and 38.9% of responders, respectively. The main barriers identified were time constraints, lack of training opportunities, and underestimation of LUSs diagnostic value.

Conclusions: LUS is widely adopted and considered highly relevant by ED and ICU physicians. However, disparities in usage and proficiency were observed between ICU and non-ICU physicians, as well as between more and less experienced practitioners. Addressing the identified training gaps and promoting standardized protocol adoption are imperative for optimizing LUSs integration into patient care.

临床使用肺部超声急诊和重症监护医生:瑞士全国调查。
目的:肺超声(LUS)在急诊科(ED)和重症监护病房(ICU)越来越普及。然而,人们对其使用、培训、适应症和实施障碍知之甚少。因此,我们进行了一项调查,以评估瑞士各地不同经验水平的急诊科和ICU医生目前的LUS实践。方法:通过部门负责人采用滚雪球抽样的方式,对108个急诊科和75个icu进行了27个问题的在线调查。结果:来自183个特约科室的18名受访医师中(急诊科医师占49.0%,ICU医师占42.3%,其他专科医师占8.7%),190名(95.5%)使用超声,164名(82.8%)使用超声。LUS主要用于评估呼吸困难(95.9%)、休克(76.2%)和低氧血症(73.5%)。ICU医生更多地使用LUS进行侵入性手术,而经验不足的医生的认证率较低。分别只有22.5%和38.9%的应答者报告了LUS检查或文件的标准化方案。确定的主要障碍是时间限制、缺乏培训机会和低估LUSs的诊断价值。结论:LUS被急诊科和ICU医生广泛采用,并被认为具有高度相关性。然而,在ICU和非ICU医生之间,以及经验丰富和经验不足的医生之间,使用和熟练程度存在差异。解决已确定的培训差距和促进标准化协议的采用是优化lsu整合到患者护理的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography. The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents. JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信