Factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with diabetes: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial using machine learning.
Nidia Castro Dos Santos, Arthur Mangussi, Tiago Ribeiro, Rafael Nascimento de Brito Silva, Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Magda Feres, Thomas VAN Dyke, Ana Carolina Lorena
{"title":"Factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with diabetes: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial using machine learning.","authors":"Nidia Castro Dos Santos, Arthur Mangussi, Tiago Ribeiro, Rafael Nascimento de Brito Silva, Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Magda Feres, Thomas VAN Dyke, Ana Carolina Lorena","doi":"10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using machine learning (ML) techniques, considering periodontal parameters, metabolic status, and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We applied machine learning techniques to perform a post hoc analysis of data collected at baseline and a 6-month follow-up from a randomized clinical trial (RCT). A leave-one-out cross-validation strategy was used for model training and evaluation. We tested seven different algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Logistic Regression. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, specificity, recall, and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 75 patients were included. Using the first exploratory data analysis, we observed three clusters of patients who achieved the clinical endpoint related to HbA1c values. HbA1c ≤ 9.4% was correlated with lower PD (r=0.2), CAL (r=0.1), and the number of sites with PD ≥5 mm (r=0.1) at baseline. This study induced AI classification models with different biases. The model with the best fit was Random Forest with a 0.83 AUC. The Random Forest AI model has an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 64%, and a specificity of 87%. Our findings demonstrate that PD and CAL were the most important variables contributing to the predictive performance of the Random Forest model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of nine baseline periodontal, metabolic, and demographic factors from patients with periodontitis and type 2 DM may indicate the response to periodontal therapy. Lower levels of full mouth PD, CAL, plaque index, and HbA1c at baseline increased the chances of achieving the endpoint for treatment at 6-month follow-up. However, all nine features included in the model should be considered for treatment outcome predictability. Clinicians may consider the characterization of periodontal therapy response to implement personalized care and treatment decision-making. Clinical trial registration ID: NCT02800252.</p>","PeriodicalId":15133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"e20250211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using machine learning (ML) techniques, considering periodontal parameters, metabolic status, and demographic characteristics.
Methodology: We applied machine learning techniques to perform a post hoc analysis of data collected at baseline and a 6-month follow-up from a randomized clinical trial (RCT). A leave-one-out cross-validation strategy was used for model training and evaluation. We tested seven different algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Logistic Regression. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, specificity, recall, and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).
Results: a total of 75 patients were included. Using the first exploratory data analysis, we observed three clusters of patients who achieved the clinical endpoint related to HbA1c values. HbA1c ≤ 9.4% was correlated with lower PD (r=0.2), CAL (r=0.1), and the number of sites with PD ≥5 mm (r=0.1) at baseline. This study induced AI classification models with different biases. The model with the best fit was Random Forest with a 0.83 AUC. The Random Forest AI model has an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 64%, and a specificity of 87%. Our findings demonstrate that PD and CAL were the most important variables contributing to the predictive performance of the Random Forest model.
Conclusion: The combination of nine baseline periodontal, metabolic, and demographic factors from patients with periodontitis and type 2 DM may indicate the response to periodontal therapy. Lower levels of full mouth PD, CAL, plaque index, and HbA1c at baseline increased the chances of achieving the endpoint for treatment at 6-month follow-up. However, all nine features included in the model should be considered for treatment outcome predictability. Clinicians may consider the characterization of periodontal therapy response to implement personalized care and treatment decision-making. Clinical trial registration ID: NCT02800252.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Oral Science is committed in publishing the scientific and technologic advances achieved by the dental community, according to the quality indicators and peer reviewed material, with the objective of assuring its acceptability at the local, regional, national and international levels. The primary goal of The Journal of Applied Oral Science is to publish the outcomes of original investigations as well as invited case reports and invited reviews in the field of Dentistry and related areas.