Factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with diabetes: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial using machine learning.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Applied Oral Science Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0211
Nidia Castro Dos Santos, Arthur Mangussi, Tiago Ribeiro, Rafael Nascimento de Brito Silva, Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Magda Feres, Thomas VAN Dyke, Ana Carolina Lorena
{"title":"Factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with diabetes: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial using machine learning.","authors":"Nidia Castro Dos Santos, Arthur Mangussi, Tiago Ribeiro, Rafael Nascimento de Brito Silva, Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Magda Feres, Thomas VAN Dyke, Ana Carolina Lorena","doi":"10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using machine learning (ML) techniques, considering periodontal parameters, metabolic status, and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We applied machine learning techniques to perform a post hoc analysis of data collected at baseline and a 6-month follow-up from a randomized clinical trial (RCT). A leave-one-out cross-validation strategy was used for model training and evaluation. We tested seven different algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Logistic Regression. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, specificity, recall, and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 75 patients were included. Using the first exploratory data analysis, we observed three clusters of patients who achieved the clinical endpoint related to HbA1c values. HbA1c ≤ 9.4% was correlated with lower PD (r=0.2), CAL (r=0.1), and the number of sites with PD ≥5 mm (r=0.1) at baseline. This study induced AI classification models with different biases. The model with the best fit was Random Forest with a 0.83 AUC. The Random Forest AI model has an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 64%, and a specificity of 87%. Our findings demonstrate that PD and CAL were the most important variables contributing to the predictive performance of the Random Forest model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of nine baseline periodontal, metabolic, and demographic factors from patients with periodontitis and type 2 DM may indicate the response to periodontal therapy. Lower levels of full mouth PD, CAL, plaque index, and HbA1c at baseline increased the chances of achieving the endpoint for treatment at 6-month follow-up. However, all nine features included in the model should be considered for treatment outcome predictability. Clinicians may consider the characterization of periodontal therapy response to implement personalized care and treatment decision-making. Clinical trial registration ID: NCT02800252.</p>","PeriodicalId":15133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","volume":"33 ","pages":"e20250211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate factors influencing the response to periodontal therapy in patients with periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) using machine learning (ML) techniques, considering periodontal parameters, metabolic status, and demographic characteristics.

Methodology: We applied machine learning techniques to perform a post hoc analysis of data collected at baseline and a 6-month follow-up from a randomized clinical trial (RCT). A leave-one-out cross-validation strategy was used for model training and evaluation. We tested seven different algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Logistic Regression. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, specificity, recall, and the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).

Results: a total of 75 patients were included. Using the first exploratory data analysis, we observed three clusters of patients who achieved the clinical endpoint related to HbA1c values. HbA1c ≤ 9.4% was correlated with lower PD (r=0.2), CAL (r=0.1), and the number of sites with PD ≥5 mm (r=0.1) at baseline. This study induced AI classification models with different biases. The model with the best fit was Random Forest with a 0.83 AUC. The Random Forest AI model has an accuracy of 80%, a sensitivity of 64%, and a specificity of 87%. Our findings demonstrate that PD and CAL were the most important variables contributing to the predictive performance of the Random Forest model.

Conclusion: The combination of nine baseline periodontal, metabolic, and demographic factors from patients with periodontitis and type 2 DM may indicate the response to periodontal therapy. Lower levels of full mouth PD, CAL, plaque index, and HbA1c at baseline increased the chances of achieving the endpoint for treatment at 6-month follow-up. However, all nine features included in the model should be considered for treatment outcome predictability. Clinicians may consider the characterization of periodontal therapy response to implement personalized care and treatment decision-making. Clinical trial registration ID: NCT02800252.

影响糖尿病患者牙周治疗反应的因素:一项使用机器学习的随机临床试验的事后分析
目的:利用机器学习(ML)技术,结合牙周参数、代谢状态和人口统计学特征,评估影响牙周炎合并2型糖尿病(DM)患者牙周治疗反应的因素。方法:我们应用机器学习技术对一项随机临床试验(RCT)在基线和6个月随访时收集的数据进行事后分析。模型训练和评估采用留一交叉验证策略。我们测试了七种不同的算法:k近邻、决策树、支持向量机、随机森林、极端梯度增强和逻辑回归。通过准确性、特异性、召回率和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估模型的性能。结果:共纳入75例患者。通过首次探索性数据分析,我们观察到三组患者达到了与HbA1c值相关的临床终点。HbA1c≤9.4%与较低PD (r=0.2)、CAL (r=0.1)、PD≥5mm位点数量(r=0.1)相关。本研究诱导了具有不同偏差的人工智能分类模型。拟合最佳的模型为Random Forest, AUC为0.83。随机森林人工智能模型的准确率为80%,灵敏度为64%,特异性为87%。我们的研究结果表明,PD和CAL是影响随机森林模型预测性能的最重要变量。结论:结合牙周炎和2型糖尿病患者的9个基线牙周、代谢和人口统计学因素,可能表明对牙周治疗的反应。在6个月的随访中,较低的全口PD、CAL、斑块指数和HbA1c水平增加了达到治疗终点的机会。然而,模型中包含的所有九个特征都应该考虑到治疗结果的可预测性。临床医生可以考虑牙周治疗反应的特征,以实施个性化护理和治疗决策。临床试验注册编号:NCT02800252。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Journal of Applied Oral Science 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Oral Science is committed in publishing the scientific and technologic advances achieved by the dental community, according to the quality indicators and peer reviewed material, with the objective of assuring its acceptability at the local, regional, national and international levels. The primary goal of The Journal of Applied Oral Science is to publish the outcomes of original investigations as well as invited case reports and invited reviews in the field of Dentistry and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信