Scheduled, cancelled, rescheduled: navigating educational supervision in residency training.

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Cecilie Normann Birkeli, Karin Isaksson Rø, Monika Kvernenes
{"title":"Scheduled, cancelled, rescheduled: navigating educational supervision in residency training.","authors":"Cecilie Normann Birkeli, Karin Isaksson Rø, Monika Kvernenes","doi":"10.5116/ijme.687b.7d22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to enhance our understanding of how educational supervision operates from the perspective of medical residents, and how they engage with it within the context of implementing competency-based medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative research study following the principles of grounded theory methodology. Participants were recruited from national residency training courses. Data was collected using an electronically distributed questionnaire with open-ended questions, which invited respondents to share their experiences with educational supervision. 96 written narrative responses were applicable for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three categories indicative of residents' experiences with educational supervision: I) Access to educational supervision, II) Links between quality of educational supervision and organisational facilitation, and III) Pushbacks to educational supervision and how residents cope with pushbacks. Residents' experiences varied significantly. When educational supervision was well-organised and available, residents managed to express how educational supervision enhanced their education. However, many residents struggled to access educational supervision (ES). Conclusion: When educational supervision is integrated into clinical practice, residents perceive its benefit to their education. Conversely, inadequate organisation of educational supervision forces residents to expend significant effort to ensure meetings occur. Amidst the implementation of competency-based medical education, residents risk being left with the individual responsibility to initiate and sustain educational supervision, which in turn places an undue burden on trainees to navigate repeated pushbacks, and workplace cultures that devalues educational support. Further research is needed to explore the affordances relevant for different medical specialties, and observational studies are much needed as a complement to self-reported data.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"16 ","pages":"128-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.687b.7d22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to enhance our understanding of how educational supervision operates from the perspective of medical residents, and how they engage with it within the context of implementing competency-based medical education.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative research study following the principles of grounded theory methodology. Participants were recruited from national residency training courses. Data was collected using an electronically distributed questionnaire with open-ended questions, which invited respondents to share their experiences with educational supervision. 96 written narrative responses were applicable for analysis.

Results: We identified three categories indicative of residents' experiences with educational supervision: I) Access to educational supervision, II) Links between quality of educational supervision and organisational facilitation, and III) Pushbacks to educational supervision and how residents cope with pushbacks. Residents' experiences varied significantly. When educational supervision was well-organised and available, residents managed to express how educational supervision enhanced their education. However, many residents struggled to access educational supervision (ES). Conclusion: When educational supervision is integrated into clinical practice, residents perceive its benefit to their education. Conversely, inadequate organisation of educational supervision forces residents to expend significant effort to ensure meetings occur. Amidst the implementation of competency-based medical education, residents risk being left with the individual responsibility to initiate and sustain educational supervision, which in turn places an undue burden on trainees to navigate repeated pushbacks, and workplace cultures that devalues educational support. Further research is needed to explore the affordances relevant for different medical specialties, and observational studies are much needed as a complement to self-reported data.

安排,取消,重新安排:指导住院医师培训的教育监督。
目的:本研究旨在增进我们对住院医师教育督导如何运作的了解,以及他们如何在实施能力本位医学教育的背景下参与教育督导。方法:采用扎根理论方法进行定性研究。参与者是从国家住院医师培训课程中招募的。数据是通过电子分发的开放式问题问卷收集的,问卷邀请受访者分享他们在教育监督方面的经验。96份书面叙述答复适用于分析。结果:我们确定了居民对教育监督经历的三个类别:I)获得教育监督的机会,II)教育监督质量与组织便利之间的联系,以及III)教育监督的阻力以及居民如何应对阻力。居民的经历差异很大。当教育监督组织良好且可用时,居民设法表达教育监督如何改善他们的教育。然而,许多居民难以获得教育监督(ES)。结论:将教育督导融入到临床实践中,住院医师能感受到教育督导对其教育的益处。相反,教育监督组织的不足迫使居民花费大量精力来确保会议的举行。在实施以能力为基础的医学教育的过程中,住院医生有可能独自承担发起和维持教育监督的责任,这反过来又给受训者带来了不必要的负担,使他们不得不应对反复的阻力,以及贬低教育支持的工作场所文化。需要进一步的研究来探索与不同医学专业相关的启示,并且非常需要观察性研究作为自我报告数据的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信