Weight bias in mental health settings: a scoping review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1596625
Samantha R Philip, Erin C Standen, Jordan Schueler, Sherecce A Fields, Sean M Phelan
{"title":"Weight bias in mental health settings: a scoping review.","authors":"Samantha R Philip, Erin C Standen, Jordan Schueler, Sherecce A Fields, Sean M Phelan","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1596625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Weight bias is a pervasive form of prejudice, most deeply and directly harming individuals in larger bodies. Although the mental health field strives to promote the delivery of equitable, culturally sensitive care, the prevalence and nature of weight bias in therapeutic contexts are not well understood. This scoping review examines how weight bias manifests within mental health settings and its impacts on client care and outcomes, exploring the issue from both client and provider lenses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 43 studies meeting search criteria were identified from a systematic search process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that mental health professionals (MHPs) hold negative stereotypes toward larger-bodied individuals. Although MHPs were less likely to report having negative attitudes, they reported a high prevalence of weight bias in their colleagues. Studies using experimental designs demonstrated that providers' clinical judgment and decision-making were impacted by client body size, generally showing that higher-weight clients were perceived to have lower global functioning, greater pathology, and more negative attributes than lower-weight clients. When the client was described with restrictive eating disorder symptomatology, however, MHPs rated higher-weight clients as less severe and recommended less intensive treatment compared to lower-weight clients. Qualitative studies from client samples revealed experiences of weight stigma during treatment, including MHPs' expressions of implicit and explicit weight bias, assumptions and misattributions based on the clients' weight, unsolicited (direct or subtle) weight loss advice, and differential treatment based on size. Experiences of weight bias were harmful to the client's therapeutic progress and undermined their trust in their provider and the mental health system at large.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The body of evidence suggests that weight bias is a serious and significant barrier to the provision of equitable mental health treatment and mental health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1596625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1596625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Weight bias is a pervasive form of prejudice, most deeply and directly harming individuals in larger bodies. Although the mental health field strives to promote the delivery of equitable, culturally sensitive care, the prevalence and nature of weight bias in therapeutic contexts are not well understood. This scoping review examines how weight bias manifests within mental health settings and its impacts on client care and outcomes, exploring the issue from both client and provider lenses.

Methods: A total of 43 studies meeting search criteria were identified from a systematic search process.

Results: Findings indicate that mental health professionals (MHPs) hold negative stereotypes toward larger-bodied individuals. Although MHPs were less likely to report having negative attitudes, they reported a high prevalence of weight bias in their colleagues. Studies using experimental designs demonstrated that providers' clinical judgment and decision-making were impacted by client body size, generally showing that higher-weight clients were perceived to have lower global functioning, greater pathology, and more negative attributes than lower-weight clients. When the client was described with restrictive eating disorder symptomatology, however, MHPs rated higher-weight clients as less severe and recommended less intensive treatment compared to lower-weight clients. Qualitative studies from client samples revealed experiences of weight stigma during treatment, including MHPs' expressions of implicit and explicit weight bias, assumptions and misattributions based on the clients' weight, unsolicited (direct or subtle) weight loss advice, and differential treatment based on size. Experiences of weight bias were harmful to the client's therapeutic progress and undermined their trust in their provider and the mental health system at large.

Discussion: The body of evidence suggests that weight bias is a serious and significant barrier to the provision of equitable mental health treatment and mental health equity.

心理健康环境中的体重偏倚:一项范围审查
体重偏见是一种普遍存在的偏见,对体型较大的人的伤害最为深刻和直接。虽然精神卫生领域努力促进提供公平、文化敏感的护理,但在治疗环境中体重偏见的普遍性和性质尚未得到很好的了解。本综述研究了体重偏差如何在心理健康环境中表现出来,及其对客户护理和结果的影响,从客户和提供者的角度探讨了这个问题。方法:通过系统的检索过程,共筛选出43项符合检索标准的研究。结果:心理健康专业人员(MHPs)对体型较大的个体持有负面刻板印象。虽然mhp不太可能报告自己有消极态度,但他们报告说,同事中普遍存在体重偏见。使用实验设计的研究表明,服务提供者的临床判断和决策受到客户体型的影响,通常表明,与体重较轻的客户相比,体重较高的客户被认为具有较低的整体功能,更大的病理和更多的负面属性。然而,当患者被描述为限制性饮食失调症状时,MHPs将体重较高的患者评为较轻的患者,并建议与体重较低的患者相比,进行较少的强化治疗。来自客户样本的定性研究揭示了治疗期间体重耻辱的经历,包括MHPs对隐性和显性体重偏见的表达,基于客户体重的假设和错误归因,主动(直接或微妙)的减肥建议,以及基于体型的差别待遇。体重偏见的经历对病人的治疗进展有害,并破坏了他们对提供者和整个精神卫生系统的信任。讨论:大量证据表明,体重偏见是提供公平精神卫生治疗和精神卫生公平的严重和重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信