Terror-bereaved parents experiences of professional help and support: a qualitative analysis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Anita Fjærestad, Signe Hjelen Stige, Atle Dyregrov, Pål Kristensen
{"title":"Terror-bereaved parents experiences of professional help and support: a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Anita Fjærestad, Signe Hjelen Stige, Atle Dyregrov, Pål Kristensen","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2529743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b><b>Background:</b> After the loss of a child, bereaved parents typically experience profound grief and face an increased risk of both physical and mental health challenges. Research shows that bereaved parents need support, but there is limited knowledge on their experiences with receiving help.<b>Objective:</b> To explore how bereaved parents following the 2011 Utøya terror attack have experienced the help they have received.<b>Method:</b> Bereaved parents (<i>n</i> = 22) were interviewed nine years post loss. The interview guide had questions about their experiences with grief and trauma, the impact of other life events and their experience of professional help. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.<b>Results:</b> Participants' experiences were found to represent three different pathways: (1) Receiving help, but not feeling helped, (2) Securing the help they needed and (3) Feeling left alone - mismatch between the help received and the help needed. Across all pathways, participants described helpful meetings with professionals, constructed as the cross-cutting theme: 'Seen but gently challenged'.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings demonstrate that bereaved parents are not a homogenous group, which emphasises the need for individualised interventions. Although most parents appear to have received some form of professional support, it was not always proactive or continuous. As a result, some parents struggled to access the right help when they needed it. Those who did manage to secure appropriate support were often those with the resources to seek it out. Although our data do not fully clarify which factors influence this disparity, it is evident that across all pathways, parents reported positive interactions with professionals. The issue, therefore, seems less about the competence of helpers and more about ensuring access to this expertise. However, the current study also reveals that some bereaved individuals lacked access to the right type of help, while others were unable to utilise the help.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2529743"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2529743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: After the loss of a child, bereaved parents typically experience profound grief and face an increased risk of both physical and mental health challenges. Research shows that bereaved parents need support, but there is limited knowledge on their experiences with receiving help.Objective: To explore how bereaved parents following the 2011 Utøya terror attack have experienced the help they have received.Method: Bereaved parents (n = 22) were interviewed nine years post loss. The interview guide had questions about their experiences with grief and trauma, the impact of other life events and their experience of professional help. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.Results: Participants' experiences were found to represent three different pathways: (1) Receiving help, but not feeling helped, (2) Securing the help they needed and (3) Feeling left alone - mismatch between the help received and the help needed. Across all pathways, participants described helpful meetings with professionals, constructed as the cross-cutting theme: 'Seen but gently challenged'.Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that bereaved parents are not a homogenous group, which emphasises the need for individualised interventions. Although most parents appear to have received some form of professional support, it was not always proactive or continuous. As a result, some parents struggled to access the right help when they needed it. Those who did manage to secure appropriate support were often those with the resources to seek it out. Although our data do not fully clarify which factors influence this disparity, it is evident that across all pathways, parents reported positive interactions with professionals. The issue, therefore, seems less about the competence of helpers and more about ensuring access to this expertise. However, the current study also reveals that some bereaved individuals lacked access to the right type of help, while others were unable to utilise the help.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

遭受恐怖袭击的父母获得专业帮助和支持的经历:一项定性分析。
摘要背景:在失去孩子后,失去孩子的父母通常会经历深刻的悲伤,并面临更大的身心健康挑战。研究表明,失去亲人的父母需要支持,但对他们接受帮助的经历了解有限。目的:探讨2011年Utøya恐怖袭击后失去亲人的父母如何体验他们所获得的帮助。方法:对22名丧亲父母在丧亲9年后进行访谈。面试指南的问题包括他们的悲伤和创伤经历、其他生活事件的影响以及他们获得专业帮助的经历。访谈采用反身性专题分析进行分析。结果:参与者的经历被发现代表了三种不同的途径:(1)接受帮助,但没有感觉被帮助;(2)获得他们需要的帮助;(3)感觉孤独——收到的帮助和需要的帮助不匹配。在所有的途径中,参与者描述了与专业人士的有益会议,构建了一个跨领域的主题:“看到但温和的挑战”。结论:我们的研究结果表明,失去亲人的父母不是一个同质群体,这强调了个性化干预的必要性。尽管大多数父母似乎都得到了某种形式的专业支持,但这种支持并不总是主动的或持续的。因此,当一些家长需要帮助时,他们很难获得正确的帮助。那些设法获得适当支持的人往往是那些有资源去寻求支持的人。虽然我们的数据并没有完全阐明是哪些因素影响了这种差异,但很明显,在所有途径中,父母都报告了与专业人士的积极互动。因此,问题似乎不在于帮助者的能力,而在于确保获得这种专业知识。然而,目前的研究也表明,一些失去亲人的人无法获得正确的帮助,而另一些人则无法利用这些帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信