Lue Chen, Qiqi Huo, Qi Wei, Thanh N Nguyen, Mohamad K Abdalkader, Shunfu Jiang, Min Luo, Yu Jing, Lanlan Yang, Shuang Wang, Huiping Jiang, Shiyu Wen, Minyue Sun, Wei Huang, Shaotong Chen, Jian Yi, Guangxiong Yuan, Hongfei Sang, QingWu Yang, Nongyan Wang, Zhongming Qiu, Duolao Wang, Bruce C V Campbell, Yufeng Tang
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis in Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Lue Chen, Qiqi Huo, Qi Wei, Thanh N Nguyen, Mohamad K Abdalkader, Shunfu Jiang, Min Luo, Yu Jing, Lanlan Yang, Shuang Wang, Huiping Jiang, Shiyu Wen, Minyue Sun, Wei Huang, Shaotong Chen, Jian Yi, Guangxiong Yuan, Hongfei Sang, QingWu Yang, Nongyan Wang, Zhongming Qiu, Duolao Wang, Bruce C V Campbell, Yufeng Tang","doi":"10.1159/000547442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may improve microvascular reperfusion and reduce disability in patients with ischemic stroke. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies to investigate the efficacy and safety of MT combined with IAT for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases in all languages published from inception to May 30, 2025, using the search terms \"stroke\", \"thrombectomy\", \"intra-arterial thrombolysis\". The primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-1) at 90 days and the key safety outcomes were death and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Effect sizes were computed as risk ratio (RR) with random-effect or fixed-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs and 9 cohort studies with a total of 6,258 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the RCTs indicated that for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke who were treated with MT and achieved successful recanalization, the subsequent administration of IAT significantly increased the chances of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1, RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37, p < 0.0001) without increasing the risk of sICH or death. While cohort studies lacked excellent functional outcome rates, other endpoints were consistent with RCTs. The results of subgroup analysis suggested that, in patients who did not receive IVT before MT, the combination of MT and IAT significantly improved the likelihood of achieving excellent functional outcomes (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that MT combined with IAT could lead to a higher opportunity of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) than MT alone in acute stroke. Importantly, adding IAT was safe and did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may improve microvascular reperfusion and reduce disability in patients with ischemic stroke. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies to investigate the efficacy and safety of MT combined with IAT for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases in all languages published from inception to May 30, 2025, using the search terms "stroke", "thrombectomy", "intra-arterial thrombolysis". The primary efficacy outcome was excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-1) at 90 days and the key safety outcomes were death and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Effect sizes were computed as risk ratio (RR) with random-effect or fixed-effect models.
Results: Seven RCTs and 9 cohort studies with a total of 6,258 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the RCTs indicated that for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke who were treated with MT and achieved successful recanalization, the subsequent administration of IAT significantly increased the chances of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1, RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37, p < 0.0001) without increasing the risk of sICH or death. While cohort studies lacked excellent functional outcome rates, other endpoints were consistent with RCTs. The results of subgroup analysis suggested that, in patients who did not receive IVT before MT, the combination of MT and IAT significantly improved the likelihood of achieving excellent functional outcomes (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32).
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that MT combined with IAT could lead to a higher opportunity of excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) than MT alone in acute stroke. Importantly, adding IAT was safe and did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death.
期刊介绍:
A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.