Semih Kalkan, Serçin Özkök, İhsan Demirtaş, Ömer Fakih Türkmen, Ali Fuat Tekin, Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy, Ahmet Karaduman, Volkan Gürler
{"title":"Pan-immune-inflammation value: a new predictor of cardiac scar in hospitalized myocarditis patients.","authors":"Semih Kalkan, Serçin Özkök, İhsan Demirtaş, Ömer Fakih Türkmen, Ali Fuat Tekin, Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy, Ahmet Karaduman, Volkan Gürler","doi":"10.1080/17520363.2025.2540771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging indicates myocardial scarring and has prognostic value in myocarditis. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a novel biomarker reflecting systemic inflammation; however, its association with LGE in myocarditis remains uninvestigated. This study aims to evaluate whether PIV levels can predict the presence of LGE in patients with myocarditis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 141 patients with myocarditis between 2021 and 2024. PIV, troponin levels, and other inflammatory markers were analyzed for their association with LGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LGE was observed in 68.8% of the patients, with a higher proportion of males in the LGE+ group. The LGE+ group showed significantly elevated levels of PIV (1.661.2 ± 22.269) and troponin (786.2 ± 10.711 ng/L) compared to the LGE- group. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed PIV (OR: 1.002, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and troponin (OR: 1.003, <i>p</i> = 0.001) as predictors of LGE. ROC analysis identified a PIV threshold of >1153.2, achieving 95% specificity with a positive predictive value of 92.9% for LGE presence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that elevated PIV levels are significant predictors of LGE, suggesting that PIV may serve as a valuable tool in assessing risk and guiding follow-up strategies for patients with myocarditis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"647-656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2540771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging indicates myocardial scarring and has prognostic value in myocarditis. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a novel biomarker reflecting systemic inflammation; however, its association with LGE in myocarditis remains uninvestigated. This study aims to evaluate whether PIV levels can predict the presence of LGE in patients with myocarditis.
Aims: We retrospectively analyzed 141 patients with myocarditis between 2021 and 2024. PIV, troponin levels, and other inflammatory markers were analyzed for their association with LGE.
Results: LGE was observed in 68.8% of the patients, with a higher proportion of males in the LGE+ group. The LGE+ group showed significantly elevated levels of PIV (1.661.2 ± 22.269) and troponin (786.2 ± 10.711 ng/L) compared to the LGE- group. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed PIV (OR: 1.002, p = 0.005) and troponin (OR: 1.003, p = 0.001) as predictors of LGE. ROC analysis identified a PIV threshold of >1153.2, achieving 95% specificity with a positive predictive value of 92.9% for LGE presence.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that elevated PIV levels are significant predictors of LGE, suggesting that PIV may serve as a valuable tool in assessing risk and guiding follow-up strategies for patients with myocarditis.
期刊介绍:
Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory.
Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice.
As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications.
Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest.
Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.