Multiple tests for restricted mean time lost with competing risks data.

IF 1.7 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY
Biometrics Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujaf086
Merle Munko, Dennis Dobler, Marc Ditzhaus
{"title":"Multiple tests for restricted mean time lost with competing risks data.","authors":"Merle Munko, Dennis Dobler, Marc Ditzhaus","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujaf086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Easy-to-interpret effect estimands are highly desirable in survival analysis. In the competing risks framework, one good candidate is the restricted mean time lost (RMTL). It is defined as the area under the cumulative incidence function up to a prespecified time point and, thus, it summarizes the cumulative incidence function into a meaningful estimand. While existing RMTL-based tests are limited to 2-sample comparisons and mostly to 2 event types, we aim to develop general contrast tests for factorial designs and an arbitrary number of event types based on a Wald-type test statistic. Furthermore, we avoid the often-made, rather restrictive continuity assumption on the event time distribution. This allows for ties in the data, which often occur in practical applications, for example, when event times are measured in whole days. In addition, we develop more reliable tests for RMTL comparisons that are based on a permutation approach to improve the small sample performance. In a second step, multiple tests for RMTL comparisons are developed to test several null hypotheses simultaneously. Here, we incorporate the asymptotically exact dependence structure between the local test statistics to gain more power. The small sample performance of the proposed testing procedures is analyzed in simulations and finally illustrated by analyzing a real-data example about leukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":"81 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujaf086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Easy-to-interpret effect estimands are highly desirable in survival analysis. In the competing risks framework, one good candidate is the restricted mean time lost (RMTL). It is defined as the area under the cumulative incidence function up to a prespecified time point and, thus, it summarizes the cumulative incidence function into a meaningful estimand. While existing RMTL-based tests are limited to 2-sample comparisons and mostly to 2 event types, we aim to develop general contrast tests for factorial designs and an arbitrary number of event types based on a Wald-type test statistic. Furthermore, we avoid the often-made, rather restrictive continuity assumption on the event time distribution. This allows for ties in the data, which often occur in practical applications, for example, when event times are measured in whole days. In addition, we develop more reliable tests for RMTL comparisons that are based on a permutation approach to improve the small sample performance. In a second step, multiple tests for RMTL comparisons are developed to test several null hypotheses simultaneously. Here, we incorporate the asymptotically exact dependence structure between the local test statistics to gain more power. The small sample performance of the proposed testing procedures is analyzed in simulations and finally illustrated by analyzing a real-data example about leukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation.

具有竞争风险数据的有限平均损失时间的多个测试。
在生存分析中,易于解释的效果估计是非常可取的。在竞争风险框架中,一个很好的候选是受限平均损失时间(RMTL)。它被定义为截止到预定时间点的累积关联函数下的面积,从而将累积关联函数总结为一个有意义的估计。虽然现有的基于rmtl的测试仅限于2个样本比较,而且主要是2个事件类型,但我们的目标是开发基于wald型检验统计量的析因设计和任意数量的事件类型的通用对比测试。此外,我们避免了对事件时间分布经常作出的相当严格的连续性假设。这允许在数据中出现关联,这在实际应用中经常出现,例如,当以全天为单位测量事件时间时。此外,我们开发了基于排列方法的RMTL比较更可靠的测试,以提高小样本性能。在第二步中,开发RMTL比较的多个检验来同时检验几个零假设。在这里,我们结合了局部检验统计量之间的渐近精确依赖结构来获得更大的功率。通过模拟分析了所提出的测试方法的小样本性能,最后通过对白血病患者进行骨髓移植的实际数据示例进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信