Women's Representation in Interventional Cardiology and Other Interventional Fields: Opportunities and Challenges.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Özge Çetinarslan, Şencan Acar, Işıl Yıldız Sönmez, Mehdi Zoghi
{"title":"Women's Representation in Interventional Cardiology and Other Interventional Fields: Opportunities and Challenges.","authors":"Özge Çetinarslan, Şencan Acar, Işıl Yıldız Sönmez, Mehdi Zoghi","doi":"10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender disparities persist in procedure-intensive fields (interventional cardiology (IC), interventional radiology (IR), and interventional gastroenterology (IG)). Despite increasing gender balance in some medical specialties, interventional branches remain male-dominated, potentially limiting women's advancement. This study aimed to identify barriers, opportunities, and the impact of gender-based differences on practicing physicians in IC, IR, and IG in Türkiye, with the goal of informing policy and work-place reforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of 338 physicians (50% female) across 3 procedural specialties. Participants answered a 55-item electronic questionnaire that covering demographics, career satisfaction, professional conditions, and experienced challenges. The complete raw dataset is provided via an online link.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 338 physicians from three procedural specialties responded (50% female overall). Women reported lower incomes, fewer mentorship opportunities, and more frequent workplace discrimination. Whereas men frequently cited \"wage suppression\" and \"long hours\" as deterrents, women underscored concerns about radiation exposure, emergency workloads, and gender bias. Although scientific productivity measures (e.g., publications) did not differ by gender, female respondents reported higher rates of emotional harassment and scheduling barriers (taking fewer annual leave days or attending fewer scientific events).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women's underrepresentation in interventional fields reflects systemic barriers, including perceived or real discrimination, physical demands, and limited structural support. Addressing these barriers, long or unpredictable work hours, radiation concerns, and workplace bias may foster a more inclusive environment. Institutional-level reforms and policy changes are essential to bridging gender gaps and improving retention in these critical specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":7835,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gender disparities persist in procedure-intensive fields (interventional cardiology (IC), interventional radiology (IR), and interventional gastroenterology (IG)). Despite increasing gender balance in some medical specialties, interventional branches remain male-dominated, potentially limiting women's advancement. This study aimed to identify barriers, opportunities, and the impact of gender-based differences on practicing physicians in IC, IR, and IG in Türkiye, with the goal of informing policy and work-place reforms.

Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of 338 physicians (50% female) across 3 procedural specialties. Participants answered a 55-item electronic questionnaire that covering demographics, career satisfaction, professional conditions, and experienced challenges. The complete raw dataset is provided via an online link.

Results: A total of 338 physicians from three procedural specialties responded (50% female overall). Women reported lower incomes, fewer mentorship opportunities, and more frequent workplace discrimination. Whereas men frequently cited "wage suppression" and "long hours" as deterrents, women underscored concerns about radiation exposure, emergency workloads, and gender bias. Although scientific productivity measures (e.g., publications) did not differ by gender, female respondents reported higher rates of emotional harassment and scheduling barriers (taking fewer annual leave days or attending fewer scientific events).

Conclusion: Women's underrepresentation in interventional fields reflects systemic barriers, including perceived or real discrimination, physical demands, and limited structural support. Addressing these barriers, long or unpredictable work hours, radiation concerns, and workplace bias may foster a more inclusive environment. Institutional-level reforms and policy changes are essential to bridging gender gaps and improving retention in these critical specialties.

女性在介入心脏病学和其他介入领域的代表性:机遇与挑战。
背景:在手术密集型领域(介入心脏病学(IC)、介入放射学(IR)和介入胃肠病学(IG)),性别差异依然存在。尽管一些医学专业的性别平衡有所增加,但介入科仍然以男性为主,可能限制了妇女的发展。本研究旨在确定障碍、机会和性别差异对基基ye IC、IR和IG执业医师的影响,目的是为政策和工作场所改革提供信息。方法:作者对3个手术专科的338名医生(50%为女性)进行了横断面调查。参与者回答了一份55个项目的电子问卷,涵盖人口统计、职业满意度、专业条件和经历的挑战。完整的原始数据集通过在线链接提供。结果:共有338名来自3个手术专科的医生回应(50%为女性)。女性收入较低,指导机会较少,工作场所歧视更频繁。男性经常以“工资抑制”和“长时间工作”作为威慑,而女性则强调对辐射暴露、紧急工作量和性别偏见的担忧。尽管科学生产力指标(如出版物)没有因性别而异,但女性受访者报告的情绪骚扰和安排障碍(年假天数减少或参加科学活动减少)的比例更高。结论:女性在干预领域的代表性不足反映了系统性障碍,包括感知或实际的歧视、身体需求和有限的结构性支持。解决这些障碍、长时间或不可预测的工作时间、辐射问题和工作场所偏见,可能会营造一个更具包容性的环境。机构一级的改革和政策变化对于弥合性别差距和提高这些关键专业的留任率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology is an international monthly periodical on cardiology published on independent, unbiased, double-blinded and peer-review principles. The journal’s publication language is English. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology aims to publish qualified and original clinical, experimental and basic research on cardiology at the international level. The journal’s scope also covers editorial comments, reviews of innovations in medical education and practice, case reports, original images, scientific letters, educational articles, letters to the editor, articles on publication ethics, diagnostic puzzles, and issues in social cardiology. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents, and general practitioners working in the fields of adult cardiology, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信