Deep learning neural network of adenocarcinoma detection in effusion cytology.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Katsuhide Ikeda, Nanako Sakabe, Kenta Fukuda, Shouichi Sato, Toshiaki Hara, Harumi Kobayashi, Masato Nakaguro, Kennosuke Karube, Kohzo Nagata
{"title":"Deep learning neural network of adenocarcinoma detection in effusion cytology.","authors":"Katsuhide Ikeda, Nanako Sakabe, Kenta Fukuda, Shouichi Sato, Toshiaki Hara, Harumi Kobayashi, Masato Nakaguro, Kennosuke Karube, Kohzo Nagata","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqaf067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cytologic examination, which confirms the presence or absence of malignant cells, detects malignant cells from various organs, with adenocarcinoma as the most common histologic type. We developed a deep learning model to detect malignant cells in images obtained following effusion cytology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The deep learning model was created using the YOLOv8 object detection algorithm (Roboflow, Inc) and 275 cases of adenocarcinoma comprising 12 182 images and 29 245 labels as well as 188 cases negative for malignancy comprising 1980 images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adenocarcinoma test dataset exhibited Precision, Recall, F1, and mean average Precision scores of 0.909, 0.911, 0.910, and 0.955, respectively. The number of adenocarcinoma test images in which 1 or more malignant cells were detected was 2710 of 2731. The sensitivity in the nonadenocarcinoma dataset was 97.1%, and the false-positive rate in the negative-for-malignancy dataset was 7.3%. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model using all the test datasets were 96.3%, 98.5%, and 92.7%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although some issues regarding cell annotation when creating an object detection model remain, the accuracy is sufficient to assist cancer screening in effusion cytology. It is vital to reliably detect malignant cells in effusion cytology, and the further development of automated systems to reduce false-negative results is expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":" ","pages":"415-423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaf067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cytologic examination, which confirms the presence or absence of malignant cells, detects malignant cells from various organs, with adenocarcinoma as the most common histologic type. We developed a deep learning model to detect malignant cells in images obtained following effusion cytology.

Methods: The deep learning model was created using the YOLOv8 object detection algorithm (Roboflow, Inc) and 275 cases of adenocarcinoma comprising 12 182 images and 29 245 labels as well as 188 cases negative for malignancy comprising 1980 images.

Results: The adenocarcinoma test dataset exhibited Precision, Recall, F1, and mean average Precision scores of 0.909, 0.911, 0.910, and 0.955, respectively. The number of adenocarcinoma test images in which 1 or more malignant cells were detected was 2710 of 2731. The sensitivity in the nonadenocarcinoma dataset was 97.1%, and the false-positive rate in the negative-for-malignancy dataset was 7.3%. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model using all the test datasets were 96.3%, 98.5%, and 92.7%, respectively.

Conclusions: Although some issues regarding cell annotation when creating an object detection model remain, the accuracy is sufficient to assist cancer screening in effusion cytology. It is vital to reliably detect malignant cells in effusion cytology, and the further development of automated systems to reduce false-negative results is expected.

深度学习神经网络在腺癌渗出细胞学检测中的应用。
目的:细胞学检查是一种确认恶性细胞存在与否的检查方法,可以发现来自各个器官的恶性细胞,腺癌是最常见的组织学类型。我们开发了一种深度学习模型来检测积液细胞学后获得的图像中的恶性细胞。方法:采用YOLOv8目标检测算法(Roboflow, Inc)建立深度学习模型,选取275例腺癌患者(包括12 182张图像和29 245张标签)和188例恶性肿瘤阴性患者(包括1980张图像)。结果:腺癌检测数据集的Precision、Recall、F1和平均Precision得分分别为0.909、0.911、0.910和0.955。在2731张腺癌检查图像中检出1个或多个恶性细胞的数量为2710张。非腺癌数据集的敏感性为97.1%,恶性肿瘤阴性数据集的假阳性率为7.3%。使用所有测试数据集的模型的准确性、灵敏度和特异性分别为96.3%、98.5%和92.7%。结论:尽管在创建目标检测模型时仍存在一些关于细胞注释的问题,但其准确性足以协助积液细胞学中的癌症筛查。在积液细胞学中可靠地检测恶性细胞是至关重要的,并且期望进一步发展自动化系统以减少假阴性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信