Machine Learning-Based Flap Takeback Prediction Modeling: Theory for a Real-Time, Patient-Specific Postoperative Flap Monitoring and Alert System

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1002/micr.70100
Olachi O. Oleru, Kim-Anh-Nhi Nguyen, Peter Taub, Arash Kia
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Flap Takeback Prediction Modeling: Theory for a Real-Time, Patient-Specific Postoperative Flap Monitoring and Alert System","authors":"Olachi O. Oleru,&nbsp;Kim-Anh-Nhi Nguyen,&nbsp;Peter Taub,&nbsp;Arash Kia","doi":"10.1002/micr.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Postoperative free flap monitoring is crucial yet taxing, requiring frequent and often subjective assessments to detect early signs of compromise. The present study aims to develop a machine learning model to predict the risk of flap take-back reoperation due to arterial and/or venous compromise, as a basis for real-time risk monitoring and alerts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study utilized patient data from a New York City hospital system from 2019 to 2024. Adult patients undergoing free flap reconstruction were included. Data from electronic medical records (EMRs) included demographic and clinical variables. The primary outcome was flap takeback, defined as urgent or emergent microvascular exploration or revision surgery during the same admission. A random forest model was developed and trained on the data with oversampling to balance the training set. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 458 patient encounters, with a flap takeback rate of 6.1%. The final model achieved a train AUROC of 0.99 and a test AUROC of 0.86. Sensitivity and specificity on the test set were 75% and 78%, respectively, with 78% accuracy. Key predictors included skin integrity, pulse, and diastolic blood pressure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The machine learning model accurately predicts free flap takeback, offering a proactive approach to postoperative monitoring. Integrating this model into EMR platforms can provide real-time early warning systems (EWS), enhancing early detection and intervention for flap compromise. Future research should validate the model across diverse settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postoperative free flap monitoring is crucial yet taxing, requiring frequent and often subjective assessments to detect early signs of compromise. The present study aims to develop a machine learning model to predict the risk of flap take-back reoperation due to arterial and/or venous compromise, as a basis for real-time risk monitoring and alerts.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study utilized patient data from a New York City hospital system from 2019 to 2024. Adult patients undergoing free flap reconstruction were included. Data from electronic medical records (EMRs) included demographic and clinical variables. The primary outcome was flap takeback, defined as urgent or emergent microvascular exploration or revision surgery during the same admission. A random forest model was developed and trained on the data with oversampling to balance the training set. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision.

Results

The study included 458 patient encounters, with a flap takeback rate of 6.1%. The final model achieved a train AUROC of 0.99 and a test AUROC of 0.86. Sensitivity and specificity on the test set were 75% and 78%, respectively, with 78% accuracy. Key predictors included skin integrity, pulse, and diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusions

The machine learning model accurately predicts free flap takeback, offering a proactive approach to postoperative monitoring. Integrating this model into EMR platforms can provide real-time early warning systems (EWS), enhancing early detection and intervention for flap compromise. Future research should validate the model across diverse settings.

基于机器学习的皮瓣回收预测模型:一个实时的、患者特异性的术后皮瓣监测和警报系统的理论
术后游离皮瓣监测是至关重要的,但也很费力,需要经常进行主观评估,以发现早期损伤的迹象。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习模型,以预测由于动脉和/或静脉妥协而导致皮瓣收回再手术的风险,作为实时风险监测和警报的基础。方法本回顾性队列研究利用2019年至2024年纽约市医院系统的患者数据。包括接受游离皮瓣重建的成年患者。来自电子病历(emr)的数据包括人口统计学和临床变量。主要结局是皮瓣收回,定义为同一入院期间紧急或紧急微血管探查或翻修手术。建立了一个随机森林模型,并在过采样数据上进行训练,以平衡训练集。采用AUROC、敏感性、特异性、准确性和精密度评估模型性能。结果共纳入458例患者,皮瓣回收率为6.1%。最终模型的训练AUROC为0.99,测试AUROC为0.86。检测集的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和78%,准确率为78%。关键的预测指标包括皮肤完整性、脉搏和舒张压。结论机器学习模型能准确预测游离皮瓣的恢复,为术后监测提供了积极的方法。将该模型集成到EMR平台中,可以提供实时预警系统(EWS),提高襟翼受损的早期发现和干预能力。未来的研究应该在不同的环境下验证这个模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信